Jason says dump Bitcoin and pivot to AI. Meanwhile, this week: - BlackRock's IBIT took in $110M - Strive bought 6,182 BTC ($511M) - VanEck stuffed BTC into a 60/40 ETF Retail gets the "sell" thread. Institutions get the bid. So which hits first: $57k or $100k? 👇

the bottleneck in AI coding isn't the agent anymore. it's the stuff around it. the agent writes the code in minutes. then we spend the next hour feeding it tickets, rerunning CI, pasting error logs back in and checking what it actually changed. that's not engineering. that's being your agent's assistant. what @superplanehq built is basically a software factory for engineering teams: pick the ticket, run the agent, fix the CI failures, show the evidence. humans just review. 52% of their own merged PRs went through it last month. that's the real headline here.

Every time I see a juicy yield in DeFi, I ask one boring question: - who's actually paying for it? Most of the time the honest answer is… freshly printed tokens. @Oly_Dao starts from the opposite end. OLY is a DAO-run token on Ethereum, built around rewards from activity you can actually check: > ETH staking through Lido
> Uniswap liquidity fees
> trading taxes
> pools on Robinhood Chain, paired with tokenized stocks like Nvidia and Tesla Stocks are moving onchain and someone has to provide the liquidity. OLY wants to be that someone. Then there's the part I can't stop thinking about: they're opening a bank on Robinhood Chain. 1,000 Charters, each one an NFT. (To be clear, it's a DeFi protocol, not a licensed bank.) Would you want one of those 1,000 banking charters? 👀

Imagine having to wait on someone else's schedule just to change the lock on your own house. Your door is solid. Your windows are solid. But the building's front lock is in someone else's hands. They decide when it changes. That's exactly where @Starknet is today. Starknet verifies computation with STARK proofs. They're hash-based. They don't lean on the elliptic curve math that dominates the quantum debate. On top of that, there's native account abstraction. Every account is a programmable smart contract. Adding a new signature method doesn't require upgrading the whole network. The account itself can adapt. So the door and the windows are being prepared. But the problem is the front entrance. Starknet is an L2. Its bridge and data availability depend on Ethereum. The most critical part of its security migration is locked to Ethereum's own migration timeline. Starknet is targeting 2027. Ethereum's roadmap points to 2029. As long as it stays an L2, the first date has to wait for the second. In the community vote that closed on October 22, 2026, 93.52% of voting power said: "Let's research this. Our own L1, our own security timeline." Let's be clear: > This is a decision to research, not to migrate. > The vote was non-binding; an actual move would need a separate vote. > A draft whitepaper is expected in November 2026. > STRK stays, no new token, bridges stay open. And let me be clear on one more thing: Starknet is not fully quantum-safe today. It's preparing for quantum threats. That distinction matters. So why does this matter? Because threats don't arrive on our schedule. Nobody knows when a breakthrough will come, whether from quantum or from AI-assisted math. Against the unknown, the best defense isn't the strongest lock. It's being able to change the lock yourself when you need to. To me, that's exactly what "Built to Adapt" means. If you want to see how they're preparing as cryptography changes, the StarkWare Quantum Hub is here 👇 quantum.starkware.co If it were you, would you keep the key to your security in your own hands, or leave it to someone else's schedule?

GM to absolutely all legends ☀️

That switch tho… badass @betfury_gaming

My friend texted me today and ask: - is crypto dead? 😅 Stocks were bleeding, Asian markets were crashing, oil was above $111, and even gold was falling. He thought BTC was getting destroyed too. I sent him screenshot: Bitcoin at $82K. He replied, “wait… why isn’t it dumping?” And I told him that markets are worried about AI valuations, rising oil prices and inflation. Normally, Bitcoin would get dragged down with everything else. But BTC dipped near $81K, got bought up and held support. For years, people called Bitcoin nothing more than a leveraged tech stock. But today, tech took a beating while BTC held its ground. Maybe it means nothing. Or maybe something is slowly changing and we’ll only realize it in hindsight. So what do you think? Is Bitcoin finally decoupling from tech stocks, or is it just a matter of time before the dump comes? Curious to hear your take 👇

🚨 Someone put $111M on Bitcoin. If price drops to $80,038, it’s all gone. BTC is trading near $81K, so there's barely any room for error. Here’s what happened, quickly: Bitcoin dropped from around $87K as inflation fears and uncertainty around the Fed put pressure on the market. Now, with BTC sitting close to $81K Meanwhile, there's plenty of liquidity above the current price and some traders are starting to look for a short squeeze. The falling wedge on the charts is also giving bulls some hope. Some analysts are eyeing $94K, while more aggressive targets go as high as $126K. There's also talk of fresh Fed liquidity next week. But none of this guarantees a recovery. If BTC holds $80K, we could see a squeeze to the upside. If it breaks, leveraged positions could start getting liquidated, adding even more selling pressure. That $111M position makes the $80K area even more interesting to watch. What's your take? Are we close to a bottom, or is BTC heading lower from here? Curious to hear what you think in the comments. Not financial advice. #Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto

Richard Heart got picked up today in Istanbul on an Interpol red notice the same guy the SEC couldnt touch last year. this time its Finland, over tax evasion allegations Crypto has a short memory but the law doesnt cant imagine what $HEX and $PLS holders are feeling right now. years of “trust the founder” and now this

A7 is ready to roll out a service that redefines international settlements. On 13 October, the Russian international payment system A7 (created by Bank PSB) will unveil A7 International. Users can pay foreign invoices in USDT and have the funds credited through a standard SWIFT bank transfer in the currency they need. The service is intended primarily for foreign-trade operators; individuals may also join. The fee is fixed at 0.3 percent. Petr Fradkov, Chairman of PJSC Bank PSB, and Ilan Shor, CEO of A7, will share the first details on 13 October at 10:13 UTC. You may join the broadcast: a7.biz/live nfa, dyor!