Hi @silencexlm @bobbilee and @arc Community , First of all, I filled out the forms you shared. However, since I haven’t received any feedback so far on the forms we filled out through Arc House, I wanted to share my suggestions here. My goal is not to criticize, but to help the Arc community reach a better place. 1. Appointing an active and experienced leader for the Turkish community, regular communication, and content quality I believe the Turkish community needs a leader who comes from the crypto ecosystem, knows the topics well, and stays close to the community. I thank everyone who has led the community so far for their efforts. However, based on the DMs I receive from users and my own experience, I see that a large part of our requests and issues never reach the team. This creates serious disappointment within the community I believe a leader should not just hold a role, but act as an active communication bridge between the community and the team. It is important that the requests and complaints shared are followed up as much as possible, and that feedback is given on the outcome. Not every request can be accepted. But even knowing why it wasn’t accepted, or what stage it is at, would make a big difference for the community. There is a lot of spam on Arc House, along with similar-looking content that gives the impression of being AI-generated. The issue here is not the use of AI, but the originality of the content and the value it brings to the community I believe content in every region should be reviewed by active leaders, and certain quality standards should be set. For example, some regional communities appear to hold a large number of events. These numbers alone do not show that there is a problem. However, the quality of the events, their attendance, and the value they bring to the community should also be considered. My goal is not to question other communities, but to help build a fairer, higher-quality evaluation system.