I mean it's better than nothing, but it misses the point of solving for AI on the platform.
You can still vibe code a world (or asset) and bankroll it for monetary gain.
Jinxxy is somehow worse than VRC is with regards to this.
The enshittification begins.
A few weeks ago, we asked the community to submit feedback on how they felt about AI in VRChat.
Here's our takeaways and next steps:
ask.vrchat.com/t/where-were-…
The solution posed is "Content tagging, world voting, punishable misleading thumbnails, and many other ideas. Of course there's no perfect remedy."
Question.
You're villainizing it, then you're asking the people who use it to self-report.
What part of this is supposed to work?
AI's a rampant plague that @VRChat refuses to address. VRC promotes AI worlds & uses AI images. Until something changes, I'm stopping my efforts in VRChat translations, VRChat Wiki maintenance and Community Testers, as well as spending money on the platform. Join group NOAI.3843.
Hey @Jinxxy_com, what's your stance on AI generated 3d assets?
I'm all for AI as a productivity tool, but I can generate clothing for avatars with a handful of prompts and a few Blender add-ons.
What's stopping this from becoming a problem? Is this on your radar? 😬

















