Krow

Shit i must be Korean

I might be wrong about this but i recognise some of those voices and if it is them they make some hella funny content. Look up "Waffle And Phatdippa" on YouTube. And check out their if real gamers played videos where they dub over games and trailers.

"letting them die beautifully" Company kills it, shelves it, because it can't milk it anymore. That's not beauty. It's the true loss of dignity. It surviving, being accessible to fans and new audiences, people dedicated to it. That's beautiful.

"to companies any content is like their child" That's just a provably false statement. Even if i granted it, would the company not want the best for it? By releasing it in every region, by not abandoning it, by ensuring it grows rather than dies?

Appalling comparison. A woman peeped on carries that violation around with her. You lose a sale you never had. One is a crime against a person, the other is against a balance sheet. Borrowing real women's trauma to make bootlegs sound evil is just gross and wrong.

Using peeping on women as an insult is so rich coming from a Japanese person, considering phones in Japan need a picture flash and sound to stop you from taking pictures of underskirts of women.

You don't need to hear what i said that picture is of what METI concluded. Throughout this conversation i have been answering any question or arguement you raised properly. Going as far as to translate when you didn't understand. You're the only one who is disrespectful.

I am not the one looking down on anyone. You're making assumptions. Movies, TV Shows, Manga, Anime, Game, Comics etc etc everything gets pirated. I am simply saying that to mitigate that it is essential to have paid legal proper convenient ways for people to access that. -METI

I'll repeat myself a third time. I will always in every case say "selling is wrong" You translating it and providing it for free to people is fine. If there are no other legal alternatives that are reasonable. This is the third time i have said this. Please Read Carefully.

Also i find it quite funny that throughout this conversation i have not once used insults yet you are so eager to say I did. Only to then call me a "piece of shit" right after.

It seems it's not the translation that's rigged it's your ability to understand or comprehend what i said. Selling it is the wrong part, you earning money off it is wrong. People having access to it isn't. As long as it gets the company to do better.

@usagis6k @knkrHanabi @ben_1225

Charging for it is the difference, the reader's money goes to you instead of the creator. Japan draws that same line: the 2018 amendment requires 対価を得る目的 before infringement is prosecutable without a complaint. Profit is condition one, which is why doujinshi allowed.

Do you expect me or anyone outside of Japan to get angry at that? Because no one will. The Japanese twitter getting angry at that and the rest of the world have a fundamental difference. We ask companies to be better. You decide what's acceptable after they've told you.

@usagis6k @knkrHanabi @ben_1225

Nobody has disputed that, three times now. The seller decides. Im asking what follows from it: if they decided a market wasnt worth serving, is piracy in that market a loss to them or not? You keep restating the premise instead of answering the question.

Then follow your own logic. Demand exists, the seller judged it unprofitable and walked away, and the demand gets met elsewhere. By your framing the seller lost nothing they ever intended to collect. So where is the harm? Either the market was worth serving or wasn't.

Different thing entirely, physical goods cost money per sale, digital doesnt. But the bigger question is yours: if theyve written the market off, why take issue with piracy in it? You cant abandon the revenue and mourn it at the same time.

You don't need to ask this question to others. If you just read what you linked yourself you will get your answer.

I'd suggest not engaging this person, He keeps ignoring the data he posted. The 5.7T is already multiplied by the conversion rate, so by his own report it is money people said they would have paid, meaning its what selling there would capture. He sees damage and stops reading.