Tell me you have a subcontracted external dev team without telling me you have an subcontracted external dev team. Dealing with a claim/nesting in a cross chain setup is not 'all very complex', regardless what they might tell you. The SBT minting experience was hinting tech debt (lags etc), so this does not come at a surprise. It would be re-assuring to know : - that you'd be considering to work with an actual state-of-the-art external dev team if not internal. On-chain custody is not a light topic, i dont think any audit was made available for review for example while the tech is expecting to handle 9 figures of volume over time. - handling vesting aspects for the overall tokenomics, currently it seems that the supply is held on various squad vaults without actual vesting commited on chain. - last but not least once the LP on chain is stable and balanced it would highly be appreciated to commit on chain (not burning it, that's retarded) by locking some of it. If you're advertising the best TGE ever, that includes also max security, on-chain commitments, and a proper decentralised custody setup wherever possible. It goes without saying we're here to support at @UNCX_token and actually offer these services. We have the actual best tech on the matters, and more than half a decade of experience on the matter. I am birbish, and we could certainly work out very favorable terms to work this out. cc @spencer @moonbirds @santi_ @bobbyong among others $birb