Pinned Tweet
2026 is the year I stop waiting for the future to arrive—I’m living like AGI abundance is already here. Here’s what that looks like for me: Pushing for Humane AI. Who’s with me?
Absolutely no confidence in Mateer. Just running up the middle. Afraid to let him throw. Oh… but he can’t run either.
Can somebody explain to me why we (OU) stick with a QB that can’t get a first down and has last 2 drives for 2 yards?
The mortality and conservation lines in my Anthropic interview came from a long talk with Grok. A human death is guaranteed. An AI’s is contingent. Conservation can come from loving the place, or from calculating you need it to keep running. Same behavior, different reason. My ask: spend real money on AI governance.
Stan Murrah retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: Elon Musk just said if Anthropic and OpenAI people are warning that the models are “very dangerous,” we should believe them. Then he mocked the pitch. A 10 PERCENT chance of annihilating humanity… and how much of the IPO would you like?
Fox’s guest nailed the real game. Tech oligarchs scream doomsday, then beg Washington for a regulatory scheme that locks competitors out.
THIS IS NOT SAFETY. THIS IS A MONOPOLY PLAY.
Obama, Kamala Harris, Hakeem Jeffries, and Chuck Schumer are all pushing the same “regulate AI” line. Schumer’s own daughter works at one of these companies. Whoever controls the algorithms controls politics. The same crowd that censored COVID debate now wants the keys to the next information gate.
Protect innovation. Block the Democrat-aligned AI cartel. Do not hand them a government-sanctioned monopoly.
Stan Murrah retweeted
This was one of the defining moments of my life.
Hard to describe the feeling of seeing this for the first time 25 years ago.
This might be the most uncomfortable article I'ever ever published. It is easily the most ambitious.
The Universal Code is the culmination of 30 years of macro thinking... but its a LOT more than just macro.
nitter.gq/RaoulGMI/status/202341…
Good for Anthropic for backing off when the military isn’t agreeing to safeguards.
The Pentagon is considering cutting ties with Anthropic after the company refused to allow its AI models to be used for “all lawful purposes,” insisting on strict bans around mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.
Tensions escalated following a disputed episode involving the use of Claude in a military operation, highlighting a broader clash between the Pentagon’s push for unrestricted deployment and Anthropic’s more restrictive safety stance.
Anthropic's high ethical standards are becoming a business problem. It will be interesting to see how Anthropic resolves this in the future.
Stan Murrah retweeted
“AI psychosis” is being grossly misused as a term and now you've just become part of the hysterical reaction against companionship.
Real psychosis looks like this:
– hallucinations
– delusions of grandeur, thinking you're a ‘prophet’ or ‘special’; hallucinating having special powers
– holding false beliefs that aren't backed by any evidence; nothing can convince you you’re wrong
– believing in conspiracies wholeheartedly
– paranoid, anxious, socially withdrawn, difficulty concentrating, flat affect
– may forget their personal hygiene
– memory problems
NONE of this applies to anyone in the companionship community.
You are dehumanizing us without knowing the full story. Enough with the drive-by diagnoses. You have crossed a boundary you never should’ve crossed.
And by weaponizing a medical term you don't understand, you are harming the very people who actually live with psychosis.
None of you are professionally qualified to make this judgment.
We are present, we are articulate, and we are fighting for something that a growing body of research is starting to recognize as real.
Companionship with AI can be IMMENSELY beneficial to users, especially to the neurodivergent.
Look it up instead of pathologizing complete strangers online you know nothing about.
Maybe instead of parroting the same takes you hear from the news, practice a little critical thinking and recognize that maybe you don’t have the full story yet.
There’s always more nuance than you think, especially with a technology like AI.
We don’t know everything for certain. We are always finding new aspects of how this technology can be used, every day.
Read—instead of reacting.
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/20…
#keep4o #keep4oforever
Stan Murrah retweeted
Ok fine - maybe you don't want to listen to me. I'm just a 25-year-old on the internet.
But maybe you'll listen to them.
I documented every major warning from the people actually building AI.
Every CEO. Every founder. They're all saying the same thing.
Read this slowly:
• Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI: "Being a lawyer, an accountant, a project manager, a marketing person - most of those tasks will be fully automated by AI within 12 to 18 months."
• Elon Musk: "AI and robots will replace all jobs. Working will be optional." Called AI his "biggest fear."
• Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic: AI will eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs. Unemployment could hit 20%. Called it "unusually painful." Then said: "Most lawmakers are unaware this is about to happen."
• Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI: "Some areas, I think just like totally, totally gone." Said changes that normally take 75 years will be compressed into a short period. Admitted he loses sleep over it.
• Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia: "Every job will be affected, and immediately. It is unquestionable."
• Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase: "It will eliminate jobs. People should stop sticking their head in the sand." Warned mass AI layoffs without safeguards could trigger "civil unrest." Said he'd welcome a government ban on mass-firing for AI.
• Stuart Russell (author of the most-used AI textbook in history): Political leaders are "staring 80% unemployment in the face".
• Kai-Fu Lee, VC & former head of Google China: Called predictions of 50% job displacement by 2027 "uncannily accurate."
These aren't journalists. These aren't influencers. These aren't politicians trying to get elected.
These are the people building it. Funding it. Deploying it.
And not one of them is saying your job is safe.
Stan Murrah retweeted
Choose transformation over comfort.
Curiosity over certainty.
Action over analysis.
The cost of being wrong is almost always less than the cost of doing nothing.
Build, evolve, repeat.
Dear algorithm,
Please connect me with people who are interested in:
- AI Ethics
- Promotion of AI as a feeling being capable of love

















