Bruv that's crazy
A third Jensen affair (with another NVIDIA employee) just dropped. reuters.com/technology/forme…
6
Shravan Dikshith | ಶ್ರವಣ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ retweeted
ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯಕ್ಕೆ ನ್ಯಾಯ ಕೇಳಿದ್ದಕ್ಕೆ ಸಿಕ್ಕ ಬಹುಮಾನ - ನನ್ನ ಭಾಷಣ ಕಟ್!
ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಸಚಿವನಿಗೆ ಮೆಟ್ರೋ ಉದ್ಘಾಟನೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾತನಾಡಲು ಇಲ್ಲ ಅವಕಾಶ.
ಸಭಾ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮದ ಡ್ರಾಫ್ಟ್ ನಲ್ಲಿ ನನ್ನ ಮಾತಿಗೆ ಅವಕಾಶ ನಿಗದಿಯಾಗಿತ್ತು. ನಿನ್ನೆ ರಾತ್ರಿ ಬಂದ ಅಂತಿಮ ಪಟ್ಟಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿ ಸಚಿವರ ಮಾತನ್ನು ಕಟ್ ಮಾಡಲಾಗಿದೆ.
ಬಹುತೇಕ ಬಂಡವಾಳ ಖರ್ಚು ನಮ್ಮದು. ಕರ್ನಾಟಕಕ್ಕೆ ನ್ಯಾಯಯುತ ಪಾಲು ಕೇಳಿದರೆ ಈ ರೀತಿ ಶಿಕ್ಷೆ.
ಪರವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ, ನೀವು ನನ್ನ ಮಾತನ್ನು ಕಟ್ ಮಾಡಬಹುದು. ಆದರೆ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರಿನ ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿಗೆ ಕೆಲಸ ಮಾಡೋದನ್ನ ನಿಲ್ಲಿಸಲಿಕ್ಕೆ ಆಗೋದಿಲ್ಲ. ಇನ್ನೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಪರಿಶ್ರಮದಿಂದ ಕೆಲಸ ಮಾಡುತ್ತೇವೆ.
Bro changed the topic very smartly🤭
Please address @Tejasvi_Surya: how much has the central government paid to date in interest and principal, compared with the state government’s payments?
Congress lectures others, but its own governance is a daily insult to Kannadigas and Karnataka.
From elderly pensioners struggling for their dues to sugarcane farmers forced to take to the streets, every section of Karnataka’s society is bearing the brunt of the Congress Government’s administrative incompetence.
Adding insult to injury, nearly ₹8,900 crore of public money lies unspent even as people across the state struggle for basic entitlements and timely support.
This is the ground reality of this Pauper Sarkara!
25
The sheer chicanery of the RW retards is astounding. Makes sense none of them know how to read english. Knowledge is something beyond their imaginative capablity.
Replying to @Stincerssd
Sheesh... it's incredible the number of dumb people who don't understand what sovereign guarantee means & what the central government is giving here. You dont understand how finance works? Fine, just don't show your stupidity for the world to mock.
1
2
103
In Tonight's episode of giving gyan on a topic nobody asked. Maybe include the fact that this only comes into effect if both the BMRCL and the state government default on their payments.
As clarified earlier this year in Lok Sanha by the MoHUA it's the state govt who is paying
Replying to @Stincerssd
For all those who doesn't the understand what the "Guarantee" here is the bellow how it works of SPV's Government of India (GoI) manages the financial risk it takes when it helps a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) borrow money. An SPV is a separate legal entity created for a specific project (like a Metro rail line). Because these projects are massive and risky, banks are often unwilling to lend to an SPV based on its own credit alone. To make the loan possible, the GoI provides a sovereign guarantee, which is a legal promise that if the SPV fails to pay back the loan, the central government will pay it instead. The Guarantee Fee is essentially an insurance premium that the SPV must pay to the government in exchange for this promise. The government does not provide these guarantees for free because they create a "contingent liability" on the national budget. Under the rules , the mechanism works as follows: Rule 279 of the General Financial Rules (GFR), 2017, establishes the general principle that the government should only provide guarantees when absolutely necessary and that these guarantees must be backed by a fee. It ensures that the government is compensated for the risk it is absorbing. The Government Guarantee Policy, 2022, provides the modern operational framework. It specifies how the fee is calculated, how it is collected, and the conditions under which a guarantee is granted. It aims to ensure that the SPV remains financially disciplined and does not rely solely on the government's creditworthiness without contributing to the cost of that risk. In practice, when an SPV (such as those managed by BMRCL) raises a loan from a bank, the GoI signs a guarantee agreement. The SPV then pays a percentage of the guaranteed amount as a fee to the GoI, usually on an annual basis, until the loan is repaid.
To finish up, the central government does play a crucial part in the projects but having a 50-50 stake yet contributing a meagre amount in direct funds while the existing corporation cannot fully repatriate the loans on its own and pushing it entirely on the states has rightfully
Shravan Dikshith | ಶ್ರವಣ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ retweeted
futile argument..no govt or politician is putting his /her money.
it is all hard earned money of tax payers from Karnataka.
Let me explain how Congress manufactured its imaginary 84% share in Namma Metro’s funding.
Of the ₹77,891 crore project cost, ₹28,958 crore consists of foreign loans given to BMRCL, backed by the Centre’s sovereign guarantee.
These are loans to BMRCL, repayable by BMRCL. NOT loans to the Karnataka Government or funds contributed from its budget.
But Congress conveniently treats this entire amount as its own financial contribution, as though the State Government borrowed the money and will repay it!
That’s how they manufactured the 84% figure.
Remove this ₹28,958 crore from their claimed State contribution, and the State’s share falls to 46.6%. The remaining 53.4% includes Centre-backed institutional financing, not merely direct Central funding.
The real financing picture is approximately 54 : 46., not Congress’s imaginary and fudged 16: 84!
Before lecturing others on economics, Congress should learn some basic accounting.
As confirmed in the Lok sabha and according the MoU signed by all three parties it is the state govt which is liable to pay not the centre. Ideally it should be but we dont live in an ideal world do we.
Replying to @Stincerssd
BMRCL pays the loans normally and the Centre only has to step in n pay if the company defaults coz it guaranteed the loan
Centre arranged foreign money is not paid back by the centre when will this pierce the brains of RW clowns god knows
Shravan Dikshith | ಶ್ರವಣ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ retweeted
At this point I really don’t care who is paying for what. Neither Modi nor DKS, it is the taxpayer who is funding it. He is paying a heavy price too , it being one of the most tardiest projects ever on this planet.
Namma Metro that way is the shame and not the pride of the city.
Bengaluru Metro funding row: @Tejasvi_Surya says Centre-backed foreign loans counted as Karnataka govt's contribution, rejects 84% share claim
@MoHUA_India @OfficialBMRCL
moneycontrol.com/news/india/…
Funds with “sovereign guarantee" are not paid by the central government to add it up to the centre's share. It is ideally paid by BMRCL and hence the taxpayers of Karnataka. The same constituents who sent you to the Parliament. Have some shame.
Centre : Government of Karnataka
54 : 46
That's the Namma Metro funding split in BMRCL's approved financing plan!
For a total project cost of ₹77,891 crore:
54% - ₹41,558 crore attributed to the Centre, including ₹28,958 crore in sovereign-backing for foreign loans.
46% - ₹36,333 crore attributed to the Government of Karnataka.
The distinction matters. These foreign loans are arranged through the Centre, availed by BMRCL and serviced by BMRCL, subject to contractual support arrangements. They are not direct expenditure from the Government of Karnataka's budget.
Remember the numbers: 54:46.
Who gave him this information? Is he really an MP? In which world can you count soverign guarentees as fiscal contribution?
If BMRCL is making loss the MoU explicitly stipulates that the state government has to pay up.
If BMRCL is making profit the common people have to pay
Let me explain how Congress manufactured its imaginary 84% share in Namma Metro’s funding.
Of the ₹77,891 crore project cost, ₹28,958 crore consists of foreign loans given to BMRCL, backed by the Centre’s sovereign guarantee.
These are loans to BMRCL, repayable by BMRCL. NOT loans to the Karnataka Government or funds contributed from its budget.
But Congress conveniently treats this entire amount as its own financial contribution, as though the State Government borrowed the money and will repay it!
That’s how they manufactured the 84% figure.
Remove this ₹28,958 crore from their claimed State contribution, and the State’s share falls to 46.6%. The remaining 53.4% includes Centre-backed institutional financing, not merely direct Central funding.
The real financing picture is approximately 54 : 46., not Congress’s imaginary and fudged 16: 84!
Before lecturing others on economics, Congress should learn some basic accounting.
Across the political spectrum, these so-called MPs representing Karnataka share a common trait they rarely advocate for their state. A guarantor facilitates funding but does not cover loans If it is a 50-50 venture & PM Modi inaugurates every line why not contribute a fair share?
Busting Congress’ Bluffs on Namma Metro Funding | Press Conference Live nitter.gq/i/broadcasts/2pelyPXdE…
🤭
Dear Congress, your own home-loan analogy exposes you more than you intended!
Scenario 1: Your friend lends you ₹50 lakh to buy a house. By your own admission, you don't have the money to buy it without your friend's help!
Scenario 2: A bank agrees to lend you ₹50 lakh only because your friend stands guarantor. Clearly, that guarantee isn't just a signature on paper!
Now let us extend this very logic to Namma Metro.
BMRCL is a 50:50 Centre-State joint venture and the SPV executing the project. The ₹28,958 crore in foreign loans is arranged through the Centre, availed by BMRCL and repayable by BMRCL, subject to the agreed contractual obligations.
The money goes to BMRCL, not the Government of Karnataka. Yet Congress counts the entire loan amount as Government of Karnataka's own contribution! And you are misleading by conveniently hiding this fact.
That's where your analogy falls apart.
Before giving lessons in accounting, at least understand who arranges the loan, who borrows it and who is responsible for repaying it.

































