Pinned Tweet
This is still the best way to follow price
Nothing comes close to this trading system
1-2-3 + PTB
I told you and I will keep telling you
Stay away from sim prop firms
Especially stay away from unregulated, off shore crypto exchanges who run simulated and highly manipulated order book
Giving Vest your money might be the stupidest trade you make in 2026.
Their docs say: âReal Vest capital. Not simulated.â
Their prop terms say ALL funded accounts are simulated.
Vestâs exchange terms say it can trade against YOU.
Its interests may be directly opposed to YOURS.
And it claims no obligation to act in your best interest or provide best execution.
Stoic Weekly Hunt ep.6
The two places I look for trades during the first hour of my trading session
Watch it heređ
youtu.be/xGclahLRZtQ
Stoic Trader retweeted
After this weekend, prop firm industry will never be the same.
Honestly, if you still planning to trade props, you either love gambling and chasing losses
Or you that naive & stupid to believe these firms give a single fuck about approving your payout and "helping" you as a trader.
It's time to take trading seriously or just quit and get yourself a job you actually like doing.
Chasing Money and gambling isn't going to get you the dream life you keep imagining.
To all of the prop firm owners and affiliates who still pretending like they aren't churning and burning prop accounts to highlight that one payout they finally got...
You know who you are and you know exactly what you are doing, all of you fcking snakes and failed traders who gave up.
I hope you sleep well at night.
Karma is a bitch.
I had been in Lantoâs Discord from early 2023 until earlier this year. I defended him from naysayers in the group and on X, distilled his content into guides early on, and built the chatbot that new members used. This weekendâs fiasco confirmed conclusively what OGs had been flagging for some time.
Fintwit prop firm influencers are âsuccessfulâ through survivorship bias and volume, not edge.
Buy enough independent attempts and pure luck eventually produces large winners, even when the underlying approach has little or no positive expected value once net on the portfolio is established. Those big runs are the ones that the public gets to see. The average guy in the audience is running 2, 4, maybe 5 accounts on average while paying discord fees to "learn how to trade"
Recent public examples among many in the fintwit affiliate and influencer space:
@dhesi_trades - 170+ accounts
@thebrianstonk - 240+ accounts
@lanto_trades - 819+ accounts
5-6 in eval or S2F fees on just one firm.
Eventually something hits. The run gets screenshotted and turned into content that's used for the next 10 months of promotions for the group, or pushed in promo videos encouraging use of an affiliate code. The costs typically don't see the light of day. Screenshots get cropped (usually), account numbers are hidden, the actual PNL on the machine is kept private.
The machine:
1. subscription fees, course sales, and affiliate commissions fund more accounts
2. more accounts make a big winner close to inevitable
3. the big runs, sell more subscriptions, courses, and garner more aff code use
Repeat.
The prop firm space is inherently dirty, relies on ponzinomics, and is unfixable; it's by design.
But the affiliate and furu space - that props implicitly encourage - is dirtier.
Fresh cash from courses, subs, and affiliate payouts keeps the account volume flowing so the occasional big payouts can be marketed as a skill taught to their followers.
The trading can lose money, but the machine still wins, because the audience pays for step 2 of the machine.
Now look at what's sold. Courses, discord subs, mentorships, and an implied promise to teach a skill to escape the rat race.
Learn this IFVG. Take this unicorn. Manage your risk. Trade the system. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and use code DUMB.
The average member can't play the volume game and nobody tells them that is in fact their mentor's game.
I left for three reasons: the quality of members in the group declined after the TPT run-up and subsequent repeat promotions leveraging that run, OGs who asked questions were treated poorly, and some kept raising exactly the disclosure issues that surfaced this weekend.
Buy enough attempts.
Hide or minimize the cost.
Market the winners as skill.
Accept money from people who cannot realistically replicate the process.
You can pick whatever word or phrase you want for this machine that is pervasive in this "industry."
Mine is "fraud."
The Market only does two things:
Consolidation â Expansion
There are only two setups:
â Range Break & Retest
â Range Sweep & Retest
Once you truly let go of all the nonsense and focus on basics, trading becomes way easier and less stressful.
#KISS
đ¨+1,499% IN TWO YEARS. VERIFIED.
And now, one of the worldâs best-performing traders is finally revealing his favorite trading setup in Englishâźď¸
Iâve been waiting a LONG time for this interview.
Meet J Law (@JLawStock ).
đ 2024 US Investing Champion: +353.9%
đ 2025 US Investing Champion: +252.3%
đ Two-year compounded return: +1,499%
All achieved in the $1M+ real-money division of the US Investing Championship.
And hereâs what makes this interview so special.
J Law rarely gets this kind of exposure to an English-speaking trading audience.
Now heâs walking us through his Multiple Edge Trading System; the framework behind his remarkable performance.
And in this clip, he reveals one of his absolute FAVORITE setups.
Itâs not about blindly buying breakouts.
He waits for momentum, the first pullback, and multiple reasons to enter at the same price level.
The setup is simple. Knowing WHEN to trade it is where the real edge lies.
This is exactly the kind of trader Iâve been trying to bring more attention to.
A verified track record. Real experience. And a willingness to explain the process behind the results.
Huge thanks to J Law, my brother @Wordsofrizdom and @ChartFanatics for making this conversation happen.
đWatch the clip. Study the setup. And bookmark this one.
You donât get an opportunity to learn directly from a trader with a record like this every day. đ
After this weekend, prop firm industry will never be the same.
Honestly, if you still planning to trade props, you either love gambling and chasing losses
Or you that naive & stupid to believe these firms give a single fuck about approving your payout and "helping" you as a trader.
It's time to take trading seriously or just quit and get yourself a job you actually like doing.
Chasing Money and gambling isn't going to get you the dream life you keep imagining.
To all of the prop firm owners and affiliates who still pretending like they aren't churning and burning prop accounts to highlight that one payout they finally got...
You know who you are and you know exactly what you are doing, all of you fcking snakes and failed traders who gave up.
I hope you sleep well at night.
Karma is a bitch.
Stoic Trader retweeted
The sim prop industry sells loss-chasing as an escape from your 9-to-5.
You finish work, open X, watch a streamer hit a massive winner and think, âThat could be me.â
Then Lanto talks about around 800 accounts and roughly $300k in expenses.
How the fuck is the average person living on a salary supposed to sustain that?
I donât care how good a trader you are. Your bills donât stop while you wait for the trade that finally covers all the failed attempts.
Recovering the fees only gets you back to zero. You still need enough left for taxes and an actual living.
Even if Lanto is net profitable, that doesnât make his path a realistic escape plan for somebody watching him after work.
The firm gets paid when you buy another account. The affiliate gets a commission. Youâre left hoping the next winner covers the damage and the firm actually approves your payout.
Sim prop firms are the worst thing for the average retail trader whoâs simply trying to make a living from trading.
No audience. No influence. No affiliate commissions. Just trading.
You need your trading profits to pay the bills. The people selling you these accounts can get paid even when you fail.
Your blown account is still a successful sale for them.
The sim prop industry sells loss-chasing as an escape from your 9-to-5.
You finish work, open X, watch a streamer hit a massive winner and think, âThat could be me.â
Then Lanto talks about around 800 accounts and roughly $300k in expenses.
How the fuck is the average person living on a salary supposed to sustain that?
I donât care how good a trader you are. Your bills donât stop while you wait for the trade that finally covers all the failed attempts.
Recovering the fees only gets you back to zero. You still need enough left for taxes and an actual living.
Even if Lanto is net profitable, that doesnât make his path a realistic escape plan for somebody watching him after work.
The firm gets paid when you buy another account. The affiliate gets a commission. Youâre left hoping the next winner covers the damage and the firm actually approves your payout.
Sim prop firms are the worst thing for the average retail trader whoâs simply trying to make a living from trading.
No audience. No influence. No affiliate commissions. Just trading.
You need your trading profits to pay the bills. The people selling you these accounts can get paid even when you fail.
Your blown account is still a successful sale for them.
Real P/L screenshot can still be a misleading advertisement.
Lanto now acknowledges around 800 accounts and roughly $300k in expenses. That is the history people needed alongside the big winners and it is still not fully transparant.
Rough expense figure in the video is still not a complete record of purchases, failed accounts, fees and money actually received.
Explaining the $21k answer as âthat dayâ doesnât undo the impression the original reply created. And $21k spent on accounts in a single day is itself an extraordinary cost to leave out of the story.
Posting the winning accounts while leaving the failed ones out gives people a distorted picture. I would argue that hiding blown accounts is the same as Photoshopping P/L.
Even if youâre net profitable, I consider that misleading and unethical. This sort of promotion deserves regulatory scrutiny.
The affiliate incentive makes this worse. Promoter can get paid when someone buys an account, even if that buyer never receives a payout. If you earn from referrals, disclose that separately from your trading results.
How many ordinary retail traders can afford hundreds of attempts while waiting for one move to cover everything theyâve spent? That is the gambling mentality this sort of marketing encourages.
Imagine youâre on account 420. Youâve paid for attempt after attempt. You finally catch the move that could recover your fees and leave a profit. Then the firm rejects your payout request.
Youâve already paid the fees. The green P/L doesnât pay your bills unless the money arrives.
The payout screenshot used in this video itself says âProcessing.â Request is not a completed payment.
Show the full account history, what was actually paid in fees, what was actually received, and any affiliate income separately. Over the same period.
Being net profitable doesnât give anyone a free pass to mislead people buying the product.
My view hasnât changed: sim prop firms are a cancer on the trading industry. I donât recommend them to retail traders. Trading should be done through a regulated broker, rather than a sim-prop casino model where one lucky streak is supposed to pay for all the failed attempts. What happens if your payout gets denied?
Take away the affiliate codes and the livestreamed jackpots, and how much demand is really left for these prop firms pretending to be âhelping tradersâ?
And for the livestreamers who think calling price in real time is proof of skill: doing it live doesnât erase the cost of all the failed attempts.
Around 800 accounts. Roughly $300k in claimed expenses. The video still doesnât reconcile that total.
Let that sink in before mistaking a livestreamed winner for proof of a repeatable way to trade.
This is your sign to focus on YOUR trading and YOUR risk tolerance.
Youâre the one paying for the attempts.
Stoic Trader retweeted
Replying to @StoicTA
stay away from crypto
I REPEAT
unless you hate money, leave crypto space for good
this is all orchestrated to extract from retail and naive beginners who think social media is a real place
social media is pay to win
you can buy fake influence, fake watches, fake cash, rent lambo, rent yacht, rent hoes...
it's all done to flex on brokies selling dreams of riches while pretending all the way to the top
fake it till u make it works very well, always did
I wouldn't be surprised that they used Kimchi guy to pump and dump while pretending to be "hacked"
no one in the crypto space should be trusted
NO ONE!
Kimchi's X reportedly been hacked
Posted a picture with a QR code which leads to a $KIMCHI token
The token pumped to $15 MILLION within minutes then the post was deleted
Never a boring day on this app
Lanto is no doubt a great trader and an even better marketer.
He knows what heâs doing on both sides.
But why rename accounts and keep them looking like original account numbers?
It makes it look like youâre embarrassed by how many accounts you blew chasing those big numbers.
Blowing accounts is part of the reality of prop trading.
Show what it actually took.
At $415 per account and an 80% split, a hypothetical 1,000 failures plus 10 winners would still leave about $7k from a $533k result, before other costs, if it all gets paid.
So you can be profitable and still present a misleading picture.
Iâd expect Lanto to get his payout approved.
Would the average retail trader get the same treatment? I have my doubts.
Not a good look at all.
đ¨PSA: Donât fall for this furu bullshit.
Huge profits. Huge payouts. Problem is the spend behind them is often obfuscated. Influencers are changing the account names that show how many accounts they've burned through. Typically they just hide the number. This time they are actively changing the account name.
On Vest, every account is numbered, so your 5th account shows up as âAccount 5â with a 5 in the icon next to it. Thereâs also an edit button that lets a trader change the account name, and once itâs edited, the icon shows an âAâ instead of the real number, even if the new name still reads like a regular account number.
Most people scrolling past an influencerâs screenshot would never notice that âA.â And if every account already comes named with its number, why would anyone edit the name just to make it look like another account number? Is that the actual account number? Doubtful.
Below is a screenshot from @lanto_trades with edited account names. Not unexpected.
đ§ľ
Why almost nobody promotes TopStep?
because they donât have openly available affiliate program
let that sink in
Long story turned short and I lost $2,000 on $ES today
I should not trade against my indicator đ
I was wrong today























