Youre arguing against something i never said while overlooking something I actually said Youre challenging something I never said instead of addressing what I said Now youre bringing up people I never mentioned tochallenge a point I never made, while ignoring the point I actually made. So if youre responding to what I never said instead of what I actually said how can you disagree with what I said when what youre disagreeing with isn't what I said? Now that weve established what I didnt say, would you like to address what I actually said??

IT'S WAR! JAY vs DRAKE vs KENDRICK 30 RECORDS. 10 ROUNDS. 3 LEGENDS. ONE BATTLEGROUND. Let the MUSIC do the fighting! Each row is a battle. Pick ONE winner per round. No excuses. Just the records. WHO SURVIVES ALL 10 ROUNDS?

Now let's flip your logic. You're comparing Drake music career to Jay business career, then asking whose legacy matters more. Why not compare artist to artist and businessman to businessman? Being 40 and still competing for chart dominance isn't a weakness. Its longevity. It's because he can do it If Jay business success proves his musical legacy is greater, does Drake chart dominance prove Jay music career is inferior? By your logic it does See how ridiculous that sounds when the same logic is reversed? And becoming an institution doesn't automatically make someones musical legacy greater. You conveniently measure Jay by what hes built outside of music while measuring Drake by what hes still accomplishing inside it. Thats not an objective comparison. That choosing the rules based on who you want to win. If you're going to compare legacies, use the same measuring stick. Otherwise, who give a fuck, youre not comparing accomplishments.