
AI Enthusiast 💡 | Product Developer @datatech | Cyclist 🚴♂️ | Techie 🤖
Phoenix
Joined March 2023
- Tweets1.7K
- Following144
- Followers24
- Likes6.6K
Open is better.
Agent Observability with #OpenTelemetry support is now GA. See what your agents are doing and what they cost your teams, on the same open standards as the rest of your stack.
🔗: grafana.com/blog/observabili…
#ObservabilityCON
Kevin Young retweeted
You can also use this to make VSCode/Cursor/Zed faster.
In your VSCode/Cursor config:
"𝚓𝚜/𝚝𝚜.𝚝𝚜𝚍𝚔.𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚑": "𝚗𝚘𝚍𝚎_𝚖𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚜/𝚝𝚜𝚛𝚜/𝚋𝚒𝚗/𝚝𝚜𝚛𝚜"
(for Zed: lsp.typescript-ls.binary.path)
Introducing tsrs: a Rust port of the TypeScript compiler 🦀
We are not forking TypeScript!
◆ In close collaborating with the TypeScript team
◆ Up to 8x faster than TS 7.0 & ~70% less memory
◆ Runs in WASM, so it works in your browser & on Workers
◆ Soon part of the Oxc toolchain
npx tsrs
blog.cloudflare.com/typescri…
Kevin Young retweeted
📤 Make exporting table data effortless.
The 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗱𝗰𝗻 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗧𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 blocks feature:
• 📄 Export to CSV, Excel & JSON
• ⚙️ Easy export controls
• 📊 Export structured table data
• 🎨 Customizable UI
Built with React, Tailwind CSS & shadcn/ui.
Explore the blocks 👇
Kevin Young retweeted
BOOM! Jev + safety this time.
150K decisions for prompt safety, response safety and refusal routing.
Built on NVIDIA Aegis 2.0. Source labels and Jev predictions, kept side by side.
huggingface.co/datasets/Mazi…
Kevin Young retweeted
An agent writes the code now. Do you still need an IDE?
You do if you want to understand and verify what the agent did.
🎥 In our new video, we talk about the role of an IDE now that humans aren't the only ones working on the code. youtu.be/AHFGMkzrfwM
Kevin Young retweeted
Developers care how the game was built. Players care whether it’s worth playing.
Gregory and Paul discuss what happens when pride in the craft meets the economics of AI.
Kevin Young retweeted
At some point I think AI is going to become my manager. I will effectively work for AI. :(
Kevin Young retweeted
Unreal Engine shipped an official MCP.
Unreal MCP lets a language-model assistant edit the scene inside the Unreal editor
The viewport is an empty gridded ground. A red-green-blue move widget stands in the middle. A black panel sits on the right. The window title says Load Unreal MCP, and a line at the bottom still says accept edits. This is the official hook Epic wrote into the Unreal 5.8 docs. Once connected, an MCP-compatible coding assistant can spawn Actors, set lights, make material instances, inspect Slate widgets, or run automation tests. It can also tell you what you currently have selected. For people building scenes and materials in Unreal, the assistant can edit the project in front of it, instead of writing somewhere else and pasting it back.
xitter.cf/UnrealEngine/status/21…
dev.epicgames.com/documentat…
The docs still mark it experimental. A lot of features are missing, and the interface will change. It listens on this machine by default, with no login. Don't open it to the outside.
Unreal Model Context Protocol (MCP) provides an official, Epic-supported way to connect your favorite agentic LLM tools directly to Unreal Engine🤝
Built on the open MCP standard, it enables agents to take action in your projects using the capabilities exposed by each editor—so you can use compatible agentic coding tools or build your own integrations, skills, and workflows around how you create: epic.gm/ue-mcp-docs
Kevin Young retweeted
One thing I find interesting about AI personalization is how much it still depends on what we explicitly tell a system.
Our preferences are often more subtle than that. Sometimes we know what feels right before we can explain why.
Sabi’s approach to understanding these signals through Brain AI Interfaces opens up some fascinating possibilities.
Especially as AI becomes more autonomous, the ability to understand human preferences and intent could become a meaningful part of building systems we genuinely trust.
Kevin Young retweeted
A KPMG survey finds that 89% report measurable value from AI, but only 12% consistently assess that value against its cost.
The figures raise a question: what can organizations conclude about AI economics if costs and benefits are not compared consistently?
Microblog @antgrasso
In its Global AI Pulse Q3 2026, KPMG reports that 61% review AI costs during approval and 59% monitor them once systems are running.
Consider an AI application that processes supplier invoices.
The finance team may know how much it costs each month. But how much time does it save once the manual corrections are taken into account?
Without that comparison, deciding whether to expand the application is harder.
Among organizations reporting established ROI, KPMG finds that 48% consistently compare AI value with cost.
Financial control tells an organization what it spends. Connecting cost to results helps it decide whether further investment makes sense.
#AIEconomics #AIManagement
Kevin Young retweeted
Can working at a successful company hurt your career?
In this week's episode, Kaila and Kyle discuss the potential career pitfalls of working at a successful org, and how to avoid the "trap of success" when you do.
Tune in here: permylastemailshow.com/the-t…
There are two types of fools during this cycle imo. There’s the smart-sounding “Ed Zitron” type, ideally with a posh British accent, questioning the value of the whole AI thing as vaporwave and utterly useless while using AI to generate all their arguments. AI is clearly transformative and enormously useful and productivity-enhancing.
There’s the second type. They are actually smart but poor at public speaking and explaining themselves, and stutters a lot. They are either directly building the tech or deeply invested in the vision. They are absolutely right that AI will be transformative, but make the mistake in thinking that it'll all happen right away sweeping across society, ignoring the hurdles to rapid adoption.
There may come a time in the coming months, when the first type looks like geniuses and feel fully vindicated, but in the long time it's the second type that will actually be proven right. As usual, timing is everything.
Kevin Young retweeted
Google just open-sourced Harness².
(turn any harness into a self-improving system)
a harness is everything wrapped around the model, like the system prompt, tools, memory, skills, and subagents. today a person designs it once, and the agent runs every new task with that same fixed setup.
Harness² lets the agent refine that setup for each new task on its own, with the model weights left untouched.
on every task, the agent proposes edits to its harness, runs a few candidate versions, and composes a better harness by comparing how those runs behaved.
because it learns from the differences between runs, it needs no correct answer or grader for the task.
that covers a single task. Harness² also carries what it learns from one task into the next.
after each task, it saves the harness it settled on along with the lessons that held up across the runs. the next time it refines a harness, it starts from those notes instead of from scratch.
this means every finished task makes the next round of edits more informed.
Google tested this with Gemini 3.5 Flash and GLM-5 on legal, office, and professional work benchmarks. one round of edits was enough to beat their original harnesses, and giving the agent more rounds pushed scores higher.
those extra rounds can go wide or deep. the agent either tries several candidate harnesses at once or keeps refining a single one step by step, using OpenCode or Codex to carry out the work.
you can find the Harness² repo here: github.com/google-research/h…
I wrote about a similar idea for agents already running in production, where the harness should repair itself after a failure instead of waiting for someone to debug the trace by hand.
that piece walks through how @Cometml's Opik (open-source) closes this loop, going from a failing trace to a proposed fix to a regression test that stops the same failure from coming back. it's quoted below.
Kevin Young retweeted
Fable 5.1: "Implement Borges's short stories. Like implement them in 3D. Do it, make them creative and beautiful and help us understand the point of the story. Figure it out."
I had to tell it that it was okay to quote Borges. Some neat stuff. Play them: borges-in-3d.netlify.app/
Kevin Young retweeted
Our new Vega-U model benchmark, I think even the whole benchmarking stuff is not needed now, as you can just attach any LLM to the decision engine
github.com/NandhaKishorM/veg…
Kevin Young retweeted
shelley in exe.dev is the ultimate tool for someone lazy like me. I literally just did, "can you install bifrost for me as a systemd service" and it did it, gave me a url to click and where to find the setup token. I love using systemd just as long as I never have to look as stupid docs page about ini config flags. Now if I can just run a minecraft server.
Gave Glimpse a 1 min clip of my smart home demo and asked for the 3D issues.
It came back with timestamps: the porch collapsing into a floating wall at 24.1s, a lantern hanging off the wall, a doormat flickering to lawn.
All at $0.60/M input, $3/M output.
🤝 Paid partnership































