Adithya Shetty

Let’s debunk the conspiracies so far eh? I love this sort of thing as it’s just rationality, logic, facts and a bit of research Hop on…let’s have a look Claim: Failure of the oxygen masks to deploy shows the descent was simulated. 
Fact: Passenger masks are barometrically triggered by cabin depressurisation, not by vertical speed. No loss of pressure was reported. Claim: Structural survival implies the aircraft was not subjected to the reported loads. 
Fact: The jet exceeded maximum operating speed by on the order of 100 knots. Post-landing photographs show a large section of rudder missing, consistent with control-surface overload. A former United pilot told the Associated Press he was surprised the airframe remained intact. Vmo is a certified operating limit with margin, not a failure threshold. The same crap was said about the 9/11 planes Claim: There were no flight attendants 
Fact: The checked shirt, navy, blue and white, is the flydubai male cabin-crew uniform introduced in 2017. Video shows a crew member in that shirt speaking Kiswahili, directing others to stop recording, and requesting a pillow for the injured pilot. Flydubai employs Kenyan cabin crew. The clothing matches the operator. Other videos show a total of three men all wearing the same shirts. Claim: Passengers forced the cockpit door.
Fact: Post-2001 cockpit doors resist entry from the cabin. The account consistent with that design is that the wounded captain released the lock from inside and came through the doorway with the attacker on him. Occupants including a passenger at the lavatory, then entered. Claim: The additional pilots were pre-positioned interveners. 
Fact: Two flydubai pilots were travelling as passengers because possible rerouting risked exceeding the operating crew’s duty limits, a routine staffing practice on the route. They subsequently flew the diversion. It’s also known as deadheading Claim: An Omani national could not have been assigned, therefore the flight is fake. 
Finding: Oman and Israel lack formal relations, and Israeli officials have treated the assignment as a breach of crew rules for the route. That is a screening and compliance question now under review. A rostering failure is evidence of a control weakness, not of fabrication. Claim: if a false flag then the passengers, including families, consented to the descent and risk of death for publicity. 
Fact: There were about 174 passengers, 27 of them children. Named passengers described an uncontrolled descent, open bins, and an expectation of impact. Consent for a stunt like this would have required coordinated silence from families after a manoeuvre that, had recovery failed, would have killed them. Claim: If a false flag then the Indian captain consented to serious injury and risk of death 
Fact: Machchhar sustained deep cuts to the head and hands, lost consciousness in the cabin, and was admitted to hospital in Tabuk. The Indian embassy described him as seriously injured, later stable. His family is based in Dubai. Consent to a false flag is insane. Claim: The first officer was a willing participant in a simulation, or the aircraft was remotely compromised.
 Fact: Israeli officials report social-media material about killing Jews, indicators of radicalisation, and a request, after restraint, that crew kill him. A colleague account described refusal to shake hands with women. He was restrained with headphone cords, hospitalised, and held for transfer toward a UAE inquiry. No technical evidence of remote interference has been produced. The background claims are official and they fit an attacker and not a seriously dedicated method actor willing to go to prison as a hired thespian for Israel.