Phil (@TheHuangWay) profile picture

Building https://nitter.gq/t.co/MLSjborUyy , investing in RE and startups | prev. advisor @Railgun_project | @karatecombat

Joined May 2011
Playoff Net Rating among the last 40 NBA Champions… 2026 New York Knicks number 1. All time run.
32
1,023
133
6,115
421,480
This is the clip.
164
2,739
175
28,648
1,288,900
Highest +/- in any Playoff Run in NBA History. Brunson & Towns have a chance to go down as one of the greatest playoff duos of all-time.
15
160
5
2,607
69,246
Phil retweeted
New York is about to make a massive mistake. The NY State Senate is advancing a proposal to decouple from federal QSBS (Section 1202) — the tax provision that lets startup founders exclude gains on qualifying exits. If this passes, founders would owe 10-13% in combined state and city tax on exits that are tax-free at the federal level and in nearly every other major tech state. Even worse: it's retroactive to January 1, 2025. This comes right as the federal government just expanded QSBS benefits and New Jersey moved to full conformity. New York wants to go in the opposite direction. As a seed investor in NYC who has backed hundreds of companies, I can tell you: founders are mobile. If New York becomes one of the most punitive states for startup exits, the best founders will simply build somewhere else — and the jobs, tax revenue, and innovation will follow. NYC has built something special over the last two decades. This proposal puts it all at risk for a short-sighted revenue grab. If you're a founder, investor, or anyone who cares about the NYC tech ecosystem — please sign the TechNYC open letter before Monday below 👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾 Keep building, NYC 🗽
217
329
128
1,744
669,619
California's billionaire tax proposal has not survived "first contact" with billionaires. - It's a money loser for the state - It is exporting wealth and jobs, not improving inequality or opportunity - It worsens CA's structural fiscal problems My debate with the architects👇
This just in: Our recent @SIEPR Economic Summit featured a spirited debate over the proposed Calif. "billionaire tax" b/w 2 experts who know the pros/cons better than anyone: @joshrauh of @StanfordGSB and UCB's Emmanuel Saez. You don't want to miss this: video👇 #billionairetax
30
104
10
735
102,287
Phil retweeted
New York wants to ban you from asking AI a question You're sitting on the bathroom floor at 11pm. Your kid is screaming. The rash is spreading up his arm. You're holding your phone with one hand and holding him with the other. You don't have insurance. You don't have $400 for a doctor. The urgent care closed an hour ago. You're Googling symptoms and getting ten different answers from ten sketchy websites. So you open Claude. You describe the rash. It tells you it's probably contact dermatitis. Try hydrocortisone cream tonight. See a doctor if it spreads or your kid gets a fever. Your hands stop shaking. You sleep. Kathy Hochul wants to take that away from you. You're the dad who works 3 shifts. You come home and there's a paper taped to your door. You read it three times and still don't understand what it means. You have seven days. You call a lawyer. $317 an hour. You have $40 in your checking account and two kids asleep inside an apartment you might lose by Friday. You open AI. In ten seconds you find out the notice isn't even legal. It tells you your rights. It tells you what to file. It tells you what to say. New York wants to make that illegal. You're the kid from the small town who left the farm for your first job in the city. Your employer puts a contract in front of you. Non-compete. Arbitration clause. Words you've never seen before. Your parents never signed anything like this. They worked with their hands. You ask AI to explain it in plain English. It does. For free. At midnight. New York wants to make that illegal too. Senate Bill S7263. Bans AI from giving "substantive responses" about medicine, law, dentistry, nursing, psychology, social work, engineering, and more. Not banning AI from pretending to be your doctor. Not banning AI from writing prescriptions. Banning AI from answering your questions. North Korea controls what you can read. New York wants to control what you can ask. So you have to go back to paying $317 an hour for a lawyer. $400 for a doctor visit. $200 for a therapist. Money you don't have. Money that goes right back into the pockets of the people who wrote this bill. Who does this actually hurt? It's not the guy on Park Avenue. He has a doctor on speed dial. He has a lawyer on retainer. He has a therapist he sees on Tuesdays. It's the single mom in the Bronx with no insurance and a sick kid at 11pm. It's the grandma who just got served papers she can't read. It's the first-gen college kid signing a contract nobody in his family has ever seen before. For the first time, a single mom had access to the same information as the guy on Park Avenue. Not better care. Not a free lawyer. Just answers. Just enough to know what questions to ask. You want to know why? Follow the money. Any trial lawyer in New York can sue AI companies and collect fees when they win. It's a lawsuit printing press. $377 million was spent lobbying Albany last year. A record. The healthcare lobby alone spent $11.5 million. Trial lawyer PACs pumped $4.7 million into New York politicians. Governor Hochul took over $545,000 from them personally. One company gave her office $300,000 in donations and got $400 million in Medicaid contracts back. Every $317/hour law firm that doesn't want you getting free answers. Every hospital billing $400 for a ten-minute visit. The entire industry that profits from keeping you confused. The lobbyists write the bill. The politicians file the bill. The lawyers profit from the bill. And the single mom in the Bronx loses the only help she could afford. In the 1800s they called public libraries dangerous because poor people had unsupervised access to books. In 1910 they shut down Black medical schools to "protect patients." Every time the gates start to crack open for regular people, someone with a billing rate shows up to weld them shut. They want you poor and stupid. And they'll call it consumer protection. And the kid with the rash at 11pm? He goes back to ten sketchy websites and a mom who can't sleep. New York shouldn't be North Korea.
279
793
122
3,851
146,021
BREAKING: China’s Vice Minister of Commerce Li Chenggang has stated that China and the United States have reached a consensus on major trade issues following “frank and constructive” discussions.
148
246
47
2,794
359,629
US entrance into stables extends USD dominance as global reserve for a few more years as fiat sovereign currencies increasingly will become irrelevant. China too late to game on this
EXCLUSIVE-CHINA IS CONSIDERING ALLOWING USAGE OF YUAN-BACKED STABLECOINS FOR THE FIRST TIME TO BOLSTER YUAN INTERNATIONALISATION EFFORTS, SOURCES SAY - RTRS
1
3
174
Institutional-grade liquidity without utility is worthless. Dolomite gives USD1 the most productive home in DeFi: → Borrow against it → Loop it into strategies → Earn yield on it You can let it collect dust elsewhere — Dolomite is where it'll perform.
7
18
4
110
11,021
It was an amazing experience ringing the opening bell at Nasdaq with the @ALT5_Sigma and @worldlibertyfi crew! Blessed to be building the future of finance in America 🇺🇸
The Future looks bright 🇺🇸 $ALTS Season
24
42
6
312
46,290
The "best performing lending DAO token in the past 90d" belongs to a protocol that has: 115 assets 5 supported chains $18B+ platform volume Built different.
The best performing lending DAO token in the past 90d: @Dolomite_io +397.31%
11
18
4
123
25,777
The best performing lending DAO token in the past 90d: @Dolomite_io +397.31%
6
10
5
43
41,980
Today, RAILGUN current value locked breaks all time high: over $127 million
10
16
2
152
8,273
is somebody manipulating $gmx right now? odd spike on binance
460
yolo $dolo
The USD1 points program will be a rallying cry to harness the excitement behind the WLFI community and grow its numbers! Can’t wait to see the effects of this program in action 🦅
5
209
Learning what works and iterating vs blindly copy/pasting is an important trait for any project that aims to be successful. The @Dolomite_io TGE and airdrop was a prime example of intelligent distribution. Corey and adam did a helluva job thinking this one out
2
2
1
23
1,306
But here’s where it gets spicy: Early LPs got options to buy at $0.045. Some took profits. Most just stacked. Even better? $DOLO dipped below that for almost 2 months. Retail got to snipe cheaper than insiders.
1
5
196
Result is that a stronger foundational base of real participants and active users on dolomite are holding the token. Early investors and team don't have large unlocks for another 8 months. Higher.
4
139