GKS

“Officially killed 17 million people.” Officially? By whom? Not the CDC. Not the FDA. Not WHO. Not any national mortality registry. That 17 million number comes from a non-peer-reviewed analysis that looked at excess deaths after vaccine rollout, assumed the vaccine caused the excess, and then extrapolated the result worldwide. It did not establish that those people died from vaccination. It did not even establish that the people contributing to the excess deaths were vaccinated. And it failed to adequately account for the rather inconvenient fact that major COVID waves were occurring at the same time. So “17 million officially killed” is an invented estimate wearing the word officially as a costume. And while many of us were actually in hospitals, ICUs, emergency departments and ambulances dealing with COVID in real time, you now sit comfortably on X imagining that reposting a fabricated mortality figure is some act of rescue. It is not. People who spread false claims about vaccines while convincing themselves they are bravely saving lives are not solving the problem. They are part of it.

Here is what actually happened. A 2004 CDC study found no overall association between MMR timing and autism. One subgroup analysis involving Black boys showed a signal that William Thompson later argued should have been handled differently. The underlying data were not destroyed. They were later reanalyzed by Brian Hooker, who claimed a large effect. That paper was retracted over serious statistical problems. Then much larger studies came along. A Danish cohort of 657,461 children found no increased autism risk after MMR. A meta-analysis of more than 1.25 million children found the same. So yes, there was an argument over one subgroup analysis. No, it did not establish that MMR causes autism. This is a 20-year-old nothing burger being served again as a smoking gun.

BREAKING: Sweden buys a different brand of vaccine, and the anti-vaccine movement declares victory over molecular biology. Yes, Sweden selected a protein-based COVID vaccine for its 2027–2028 national procurement. What your post conveniently omits is that Sweden’s own public-health agency continues to describe mRNA vaccines as effective against severe COVID. And here’s the delicious part: Novavax contains the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. You know, the protein you’ve spent years telling everyone is poison. The difference is that Novavax delivers the manufactured protein, while mRNA vaccines instruct cells to produce it temporarily. A purchasing decision is not evidence of a medical catastrophe. Sweden changed its vaccine supplier. You changed the meaning of the announcement. Perhaps next time, read the Swedish public-health guidance before announcing what Sweden believes.