Pinned Tweet
Don't be afraid of adapting the language we use to help our separated brethren better understand the Holy Catholic Faith. Only be weary of, in this honorable pursuit, mangling the faith such that the substance is changed by conforming to the positions of those we try to reach.
Brayden Cook retweeted
Excited to dig into this new translation of Henri de Lubac’s commentary on Dei Verbum from @IgnatiusPress!
Brayden Cook retweeted
Replying to @KnowsPascal
no. actually the only one is the Second Vatican Council. Because that is the new Pentecost. everything before is just antiquity and not even worth mentioning
Wherefore, even eternal life itself, which is surely the reward of good works, the apostle calls the gift of God. For the wages of sin, he says, is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Wages (stipendium) is paid as a recompense for military service; it is not a gift: wherefore he says, the wages of sin is death, to show that death was not inflicted undeservedly, but as the due recompense of sin. But a gift, unless it is wholly unearned, is not a gift at all. We are to understand, then, that man's good deserts are themselves the gift of God, so that when these obtain the recompense of eternal life, it is simply grace given for grace. Man, therefore, was thus made upright that, though unable to remain in his uprightness without divine help, he could of his own mere will depart from it. And whichever of these courses he had chosen, God's will would have been done, either by him, or concerning him. Therefore, as he chose to do his own will rather than God's, the will of God is fulfilled concerning him; for God, out of one and the same heap of perdition which constitutes the race of man, makes one vessel to honor, another to dishonor; to honor in mercy, to dishonor in judgment; that no one may glory in man, and consequently not in himself.
St. Augustine, The Enchiridion on Faith, Hope and Love 107
Inquietude proceeds from an inordinate desire of either being delivered from the evil we feel or of acquiring the good we hope for. And yet, there is nothing that more increases the evil or removes the good further from us than an unquiet mind. Birds remain prisoners in nets, because finding themselves prisoners, they eagerly flutter and beat about to get loose again and, by that means, entangle themselves even more. Whenever, then, you are pressed with a desire to be freed from some evil or to attain to some good be careful first to settle your mind in repose and tranquility, and to compose your judgment and will. Then, follow the movements of your desire, quietly using the means which maybe most convenient.
St. Francis De Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life 4.11
"Paedobaptism... which emerges in the late 3rd, early 4th century."
Meanwhile:
St. Irenaeus (A.D. 189), who explicitly ties regeneration to Baptism:
"For He came to save all through means of Himself—all, I say, who through Him are born again to God—INFANTS, and children, and boys, and youths, and old men." (Iren., Adv. Haer. 2.22.4)
St. Hyppolitus of Rome (A.D. 215):
“Baptize first the children, and if they can speak for themselves let them do so. Otherwise, let their parents or other relatives speak for them” (The Apostolic Tradition 21:4)
Origen (mid 200s):
"The Church received from the apostles the tradition of giving baptism even to infants. The apostles, to whom were committed the secrets of the divine sacraments, knew there are in everyone innate strains of [original] sin, which must be washed away through water and the Spirit" (Commentaries on Romans 5:9)
Sam (@samuel_parkison) getting a little spicy on baptists, baptism, and retrieval.
youtu.be/R2zhReKUiTw?si=7uQe…
Justin said: “Worship the God of the Christians. We hold him to be from the beginning the one creator and maker of the whole creation, of things seen and things unseen. We worship also the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God. He was foretold by the prophets as the future herald of salvation for the human race and the teacher of distinguished disciples. For myself, since I am a human being, I consider that what I say is insignificant in comparison with his infinite godhead. I acknowledge the existence of a prophetic power, for the one I have just spoken of as the Son of God was the subject of prophecy. I know that the prophets were inspired from above when they spoke of his coming among men.”
Rusticus said: “You are a Christian, then?” Justin said: “Yes, I am a Christian.” The prefect said to Justin: “You are called a learned man and think that you know what is true teaching. Listen: if you were scourged and beheaded, are you convinced that you would go up to heaven?” Justin said: “I hope that I shall enter God’s house if I suffer that way. For I know that God’s favor is stored up until the end of the whole world for all who have lived good lives.”
From the Acts of the martyrdom of Saint Justin and his companion saints
In honor of Halloween coming up, I'm shamelessly reposting this gem: youtu.be/f73I1mPAkGI?si=cTNc…
Brayden Cook retweeted
Why do Baptists think that it’s some sort of mic drop to quote the rest of the verse. It literally does nothing to help their case…
1 John 2:16-17
For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the pride of life, is not of the Father but is of the world. And the world passes away, and the lust of it; but he who does the will of God abides for ever.
Brayden Cook retweeted
I don’t mind him doing this to a Quran but it seems like his sermons are just him breaking props
He who lives in heresy through ignorance for which he is not himself to blame is not a heretic in the sight of God. Thus those who are brought up in Protestantism, and have no opportunity of obtaining sufficient instruction in the Catholic religion, are not heretics in the sight of God, for in them there is no obstinate denial or doubt of the truth. They are no more heretics than the man who takes the property of another unwittingly is a thief.
Rev. Francis Spirago, The Roman Catechism Explained 1.7.1.a
But dost thou think, Chemnitz, that all of us who were present at the Council of Trent brought from home all things already prejudged which were there concluded? Believe me: many previously thought far otherwise; many in very many matters followed an opinion quite different, which they not only tried openly to attest, but also to persuade by arguments. But since the common zeal of all was to find the truth, to separate certain things from doubtful, true from false, religious from sacrilegious, there was no one in so great a multitude of men who, once he had heard the definition of the Council, did not wholly obey, cast away his opinion, put off his own mind, change his judgment, and embrace with religious reverence what had been pronounced by the Fathers. For we knew that it is lawful for a Christian man to adhere to his own judgment only so long as no judgment of the Church stands forth concerning that matter; and that in this the greatest force of faith is discerned, that, even when genius resists, we humbly kiss the decisions of the Church, and believe that to be the true sense of Scripture which the sacrosanct Council has handed down.
Diogo de Paiva de Andrada, Defensio Tridentinae Fidei Catholicae et Integerrimae, 1.30
read for free here: xitter.cf/The_Catechumen/status/…
Diogo de Paiva de Andrade (1528-1575) thoroughly and masterfully defends the teachings of the Council of Trent against 1st and 2nd generation Protestant attempts to fight against its decrees. This is the first English translation of this massive work, and I hope it will benefit you as much as it has for me. Thus far, only having the opportunity to read small portions of this work, it has helped me immensely. I am excited to dive deeper into this historic apologetical defense. The PDF is available now for free on my substack.
Diogo de Paiva de Andrade (1528-1575) thoroughly and masterfully defends the teachings of the Council of Trent against 1st and 2nd generation Protestant attempts to fight against its decrees. This is the first English translation of this massive work, and I hope it will benefit you as much as it has for me. Thus far, only having the opportunity to read small portions of this work, it has helped me immensely. I am excited to dive deeper into this historic apologetical defense. The PDF is available now for free on my substack.























