最近有很多不错的小工具，能帮您找回一些ETH、SOL等零钱，建议不要给网站任何授权，包括不仅限于TOKEN授权、预签名、剪切板、摄像头等等。甚至如果有条件，检查阶段的浏览器最好也在沙箱中，拒绝下载任何陌生APP/插件。
Recently, many useful tools have emerged that can help you recover small amounts of ETH, SOL, etc. It's advisable not to grant any authorization to websites, including but not limited to token authorization, pre-signing, clipboard access, webcam access, etc. Ideally, your browser should also be sandboxed during the verification process to prevent the download of any unfamiliar apps or plugins.
Big pump on the way,no matter about surface factors
If Republicans win the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 2026 Midterm Elections, I’m going to give all adult citizens in the United States of America, $5,000! Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to signing those checks!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This $5,000 “Trump Dividend” promise was first made in Sept. 2026. Similar prior DOGE and tariff check pledges have not been paid out. It would cost ~$1.2 trillion and require congressional approval.
pbs.org/newshour/polit…
washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/…
TokenAirdrop&Research🛡️币空投网 retweeted
✅️YES～For the past few years, I have been using my subjective judgment of AI consciousness as a reference indicator of a person's cognitive dimension. Now that the name has been chosen, this indicator has lost its function.
Many people still don't understand that when a theory has become so widely discussed that it can be readily debated in a marketplace, it's about to become history. The era of a single dollar is coming to an end, but US Treasury bonds remain singular. A pseudo-tightening, a genuine bull market—the momentum is immense and awaits verification.
TokenAirdrop&Research🛡️币空投网 retweeted
Increasing explicit ETH mainchain rents is less effective than relying on implicit rents because economic scale is immeasurable for the protocol. Raising fees paid by L2 to L1 will inevitably drive some business to competitors. Therefore, the amount of liquid ETH held is actually a good path. Encouraging L2 to maintain liquidity essentially means paying for staked ETH. The combined interest rate spread between L1 and L2, plus the FEE paid by L2 to L1, becomes the real fee rate, a state that can be measured by the protocol. (This is why proposals like EIP-8363, which are either stupid or malicious, feel so betrayed; they push the expected implicit fee rate for L2 to near zero.)
TokenAirdrop&Research🛡️币空投网 retweeted
提升显性的ETH主链租金不如依靠隐性租金，因为经济规模对协议而言不可衡量，提高L2向L1支付的费用势必会驱赶一些业务到竞争对手。那么实际上流动性ETH的占有量是一个不错的路径，鼓励L2保持流动性状态ETH本质上就是向质押中的ETH付费，L1和L2之间的综合息差+L2向L1支付的FEE成为真实费率，而这是可以由协议衡量的状态。（这也是为什么对像EIP-8363那种非蠢即坏的提案感到非常的被背叛，它将L2预期隐性费率压到趋近于零。）
TokenAirdrop&Research🛡️币空投网 retweeted
ETH接下來通過L2的價值捕獲通道並不僅僅是向主網貢獻的手續費，而是貢獻的$ETH的占有量，從而提高ETH的廣義鎖定率。而Robinhood、BASE、Arbitrum One等不僅僅在不斷的將ETH沉澱入交易池中，還在將新的價值(RWA)匹配進來，真正做到了開源節流。有價值堆積的地方，往往蘊含超額收益。
If you're torn between crypto and stocks, it would be sexy to buy half in USD and half in LPs (similar to $ETH/$SPY).
RobinhoodChain向Ethereum提交手续费过低是论点是一个非常浅薄的谬误，该观点只统计了L2向L1网络支付的手续费部分，完全没有一个整体的钱聚集和钱流向的整体观。你要是连钱往哪聚和钱网哪流都搞不清，下一个牛市不活该白玩嘛。
RobinhoodChain是一个典型的嗜流动性Layer2，它的用户对流动性可及度要求非常高，它不可能将 $ETH 存款大比例的 Staking ，并且参加L1上的第三方DEFI的空间也很有闲，因为一旦他大规模这么做将直接暴露一个招致挤兑的致命弱点。所以RobinhoodChain上的ETH存款大多数是不能吃到Staking增发的，也就是说它在向主网参与无论何种质押的ETH(也就是验证人)付费，它实际上在ETH本位上支付了实时利息(也可以叫流动性占用费)+手续费的费用，以支持网络的维护。
另一方面它实实在在往Ethereum网络上装载了大量的价值，并且为以太坊扩增了很多的需求。ETH的质押者，如DAT公司在收到ETH增发时只是名义收入，名义收入是否可以变成法币真实收入得看外部系统对其的需求，只有这些角色有了真实收入才能进一步反哺以太坊的基础建设。
所以 Robinhood 实际上是和以太坊网络非常互惠共赢的，与ETH持有人的利益非常对齐。同样具备此潜力的L2还有 @base @inkonchain 等等具备输入引入能力的角色，以上只是抛砖引玉，不构成任何建议
The argument that RobinhoodChain's transaction fees to Ethereum are too low is a very superficial fallacy. This view only considers the fees paid by L2 to L1 networks, completely lacking a holistic view of money aggregation and flow. If you can't even figure out where money is going, you're doomed to miss out on the next bull market.
RobinhoodChain is a typical liquidity-hungry Layer 2. Its users have very high liquidity accessibility requirements. It's unlikely to stake a large proportion of its ETH deposits, and it has ample room to participate in third-party DeFi on L1, because doing so on a large scale would directly expose a fatal weakness that could lead to a run on the platform. Therefore, most ETH deposits on RobinhoodChain do not benefit from staking and issuance. In other words, it pays to all ETH staked on the mainnet (i.e., validators), effectively paying real-time interest (also called liquidity usage fees) plus transaction fees on the ETH base to support network maintenance.
On the other hand, it genuinely injects a significant amount of value into the Ethereum network and significantly increases demand for Ethereum. ETH stakers, such as DAT, only receive nominal income when they receive new ETH. Whether this nominal income can be converted into real fiat currency depends on the demand from external systems. Only when these stakers receive real income can they further support Ethereum's infrastructure.
Therefore, Robinhood is actually a highly mutually beneficial entity with the Ethereum network, and its interests are closely aligned with those of ETH holders. Other L2 utilities with similar potential include @base and @inkonchain, which possess input-carrying capabilities. The above is merely a starting point and does not constitute any advice.