Tony Sheehan

3 more beasts allowed to enter the UK on a small boat to terrorise women. Went on to brutally rape a woman they lured from Brighton beach. Laughed at her, filmed her, humiliated her. Sentenced to deservedly long sentences today. More cultural enrichment . Enough ffs.

🚨UK GOVERNMENT CAUGHT HIDING TWELVE NEW MIGRANT CENTRES Speaker Lindsay Hoyle was FURIOUS with his own Labour Party "IT IS TOTALLY UNNACEPTABLE ONCE AGAIN!" "This Government don't seem to understand that MP's should hear the news first" THEY CAN'T JUST DO THIS IN SECRET

The woman speaks for the entire country right now. An absolutely glorious rant against Keir Starmer. And she signs off in the most quintessentially British way.

A school teacher called me a “racist c*nt” while I was minding my own business. So I stopped and asked a few simple questions. If you’re so convinced I’m wrong, why can’t you answer basic facts? Watch what happens when emotion collides with reality. The people screaming “racist” the loudest are often the people who know the least. If you live in or around Kingston Upon Thames, this woke woman could be teaching YOUR kids!

Right folks I’m aware that this matter is Subjudice however the @CPSUK made outrageous claims against Ex Dorset PC Lorne Castle NOT Written by them but I’m CERTAIN someone within @dorsetpolice & Parroted by the CPS; bear with me;👇 The CPS today despite having the Full File for Months FAILED to give disclosure; ie supply ALL their evidence to the Defendant Lorne Castle; including statements Video evidence along with Medical evidence concerning the ‘alleged’ Injury👇 How can you plead Guilty or Not Guilty when you haven’t seen any of the evidence against you apart from a couple of clips & a few sentences of statements given at a previous interview Prior to a charge; You Cannot it’s like looking at a blank piece of paper Nothing to see!🤷‍♂️ The CPS Lawyer Ms O’Callaghan then applied for some sort of reporting restriction ie so No One can report on the suspect that Lorne Nicked the charges he faces etc Well she got the Act & Section Wrong she applied under Sec 35 which is for a child the suspect apparently is very much an Adult; The Judge pulled her up on this & stated that it’s not within his power to do so as the matter is being heard at another court; Then it gets interesting she accused Lorne of Inflicting ‘Grave Injury’ normally such words are for a Sec 18 GBH With Intent Lorne’s is the Lower GBH Sec 20; She stated the minimum sentence should be high the Judge disagreed & he also pointed out that Lorne too had received injuries; to date you have not been told that; She stated that Lorne was Not acting as a Good Samaritan; a jury when hearing the full facts may beg to differ; Mr Castle was a Police Officer dismissed for other matters; Yes he was dismissed for calling a Knife Carrying Thug a bitch; apparently this was rude & disrespectful🤷‍♂️🙄 He was undergoing an appeal against dismissal; She would be correct; “We say (CPS) he has detained {The man} in an attempt to appear a Good Samaritan to support his appeal” So? Lorne whilst out shopping for his wife in Bournemouth; foresaw & KNEW a shoplifter was stealing goods from a shop & thought this will make me look good? Are we Fucking serious here?🤷‍♂️🙄🤦‍♂️ Ms O’Callaghan went on; “But when he made physical contact {The man >Suspect} dropped all the property £450 worth of Nike gear) There was no need to use force” Lorne will disagree just because someone drops stolen property you detain them & don’t allow them to run off! She went on “It made the Newspapers; Mr Castle reportedly told security staff nearby & asked them to publish it to support his appeal against dismissal” Utter Utter Bollox never happened & what shop staff have any contact with the MEDIA? None!! I can tell you who told the Media? it was Chris Amey who was supporting Lorne alongside me; We BOTH had been dealing with the media supporting Lorne; so it was US who had the contacts & NOT any shop staff; The reason Chris spoke with the media was because they had covered his story & Chris’s point was here’s an Ex Cop shafted by his own force Dorset doing what he does best & that is tackling those who break the law & here he had not only recovered £450 worth of goods but also the suspect; Ms O’Callaghan stated Lorne held on to the suspect for between 20/30 mins? Yes because that’s how fucking long it took the police to arrive & take over the arrest; there are No set maximum or minimum time periods we can detain someone it takes what it takes; One of my shoplifting arrests I had a suspect on the ground for 30mins in Twickenham until two MET Units turned up 28 mins late Ms O’Callaghan concluded “It is more Sinister than it appears” WHAT?🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Lorne’s Solicitor responded to all this Utter Bollox with the following statement; This is the First Time I’ve heard of these ‘Fanciful’ suggestions that was part of some Grand Plan” & he left it at that! I’m with Lorne’s Solicitor; Lorne appears at Reading Crown Court on 23rd June! Make of this👆as you want; I’ve just given My Own Overview! Thanks🙏

Our party has suffered a historic defeat. Many good Labour colleagues have lost their seats despite working hard for those they represented. We have lost good Labour administrations and lost the chance for more. What we are doing isn’t working, and it needs to change. This may be our last chance. The Labour Party must now live up to our name: we must be the party of working people. We’ve heard the same on the doorstep as we’ve seen in the polls - the cost of living is the top issue for voters of all parties. People have turned to populists and nationalists because we have not done enough to fix it. Living standards are barely higher than they were a decade and a half ago. People feel hopeless - that the cost of living crisis will never end, and now they see oil and gas companies use global instability to post record profits. Once again, ordinary people are paying the price for decisions they didn’t make. It’s no wonder that across the UK, working people feel the system is rigged against them. Things can be so much better than this. Countries including Spain and Canada have shown that economies can grow and people can thrive when governments stay true to labour and social democratic values and put people first. We need to learn from that. In London, we lost young people who fear they will never afford a home. In my patch and across the north, we lost working people whose wages are too low and costs too high. In Scotland and Wales, people do not currently see Labour as the answer.  We are in danger of becoming a party of the well-off, not working people. The Peter Mandelson scandal showed a toxic culture of cronyism.  Decisions like cutting winter fuel allowance just weren’t what people expected from a Labour government. For too long, successive governments have allowed wealth and power to concentrate at the top without a plan to ensure the benefits of economic growth are shared fairly. The result is an economy that does not work for the majority, with wealth concentrated in too few hands. This level of inequality, alongside squeezed living standards, is the outcome of a model built on deregulation, privatisation, and trickle-down economics. But we have the chance to fix this.  1/2

History made. We won ten out of ten seats, with overwhelming majorities in every single one. Great Yarmouth First, then we Restore Britain. A very special day.

I will NOT be attending the rally on May 16th in London that @TRobinsonNewEra is organizing and I likely won’t be attending CPAC UK either because the United Kingdom has decided, randomly, that I am unable to travel there any longer because my prescence is “not conducive to the public good”. I have had this ETA travel permission since last May and have been to the United Kingdom about four or five times since then. I didn’t reapply or anything. Today, I just woke up to this notice in my email. They have banned an American citizen from their country for no apparent reason whatsoever. I assume for matters of freedom of speech, but they haven’t clarified. I will most certainly be appealing that decision and applying for a visa through the formal process to see exactly why they’ve deemed me ineligible to come over. Free speech is DEAD in the United Kingdom. Absolutely dead. The Labour government has taken whatever was left of it and destroyed it.

A young couple in England, the day before they were due to exchange contracts on what was to be their first home, received two phone calls in quick succession. The first was from their estate agent. The second was from their solicitor. The information was the same in both. The local council had outbid them for their house, by £20,000. The seller had accepted. The couple had been bidding for the house since the asking price was £150,000. The bidding had taken the price up to £190,000, already, by their own account, the upper edge of what they could afford. The council had come in at £210,000, a level they could not match. Their offer was abandoned. Their survey, costing £900, was wasted. They still owe legal fees of £2,200 plus VAT regardless. The fixed-rate mortgage offer they had secured, in a market where rates have been rising again, will now expire before they find another property. Their landlord has new tenants moving in to their current rental in the second week of June. They are looking, on the calendar in front of them, at potential homelessness inside two months. The reason the council bought the house was disclosed to them, after some pushing, by a councillor they happened to know personally. The council needed urgent additional accommodation for asylum seekers. The property they had been buying was already previously registered as a House in Multiple Occupation, which made the conversion straightforward. The taxpayer money the council used to outbid them comes from a £500 million national pilot scheme, established under the present government, in which local authorities are funded to buy properties on the open market in order to house asylum seekers and reduce the cost of asylum hotels. In other words, local government is, on the order of central government, using your own money to give housing that you should It's a representative case. 134,760 British households were in temporary accommodation as of September 2025, which is a record. 4,793 people were sleeping rough on a single night in autumn 2025, also a record, and 171% higher than in 2010. 28% of all new social housing lettings in England in 2024/25, approximately 75,000 households, went to people deemed statutorily homeless. The number of new social housing lettings that included a member of the Armed Forces community was, in the same year, approximately 2,600. The number of new lettings that went to non-UK nationals, on the basis of the nationality data published by central government, was substantially in excess of that veteran figure, by, depending on how the data is cut, about 10x. This is the British state, in 2026, using the working tax contributions of two young people in the first weeks of trying to buy a home, to outbid those same two young people for that same home, in order to provide free accommodation for foreign nationals whose claims to be in this country have not yet been assessed and may well be completely worthless. The young people will, on the present trajectory, be made homeless in the same June in which the asylum seekers move into the property they were trying to buy. The young people will be paying, through their council tax for the rest of their working lives, for the accommodation in which the asylum seekers will live. It is likely, given the number of migrants to Britain whose lifetime tax contribution is net negative, that they will be paying tax to offset these new arrivals for the rest of their lives. It goes without saying that we need the most fundamental imaginable reconstruction of our asylum, housing, planning, and immigration laws to prevent such travesties of justice from happening again. We all know what is required by way of change in those areas. Progress has written a more extensively policy testament on this subject than any other political organisation in Britain. Beyond that there is one last thing worth saying. The young couple, on the available account, are not in a position to fight any of this through the courts. They cannot afford to. Their solicitor, on their telling, was pressing them for the legal fees on a debit card before the rest of the conversation was over. They will, in all likelihood, lose the home, the deposit, the survey, the rate deal, and the remainder of their tenancy in a single short summer. They will then watch the property they were trying to buy be filled, at the public's expense, by the people the British state has decided to prioritise over them. If that does not make you furious enough to do something about what is happening in Britain, nothing will.

This is easily one of the most astonishing interviews with a Labour MP I have *EVER* seen. @CamillaTominey in absolute disbelief, as was I, at Tom Hayes awful gaslighting in defence of Keir Starmer. I've never seen anything like it. It's SO BAD I had to post the whole thing.