Good morning lovelies … 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁… 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴’𝘀 𝗽𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗼𝗿𝗱. @Starknet ‘s rooms are already easy to change. ▸ Hash based STARK proofs verify computation without leaning on elliptic curve assumptions ▸ Native account abstraction makes every account a programmable smart contract ▸ New signature methods can be added at the account level without a network-wide upgrade. The plumbing is different. As an L2, Starknet settles on Ethereum, so part of its security picture depends on Ethereum’s cryptography & Ethereum’s migration timeline, and that schedule is not Starknet’s to set. That is the case for an independent Starknet L1. @Starknet is exploring its own, so it has more say over when core security upgrades happen instead of waiting on someone else’s calendar. It is an exploration, not a finished product, and each account still has to adopt new methods for itself. Quantum computing & AI assisted mathematics could both challenge today’s cryptography, and nobody can say which lands first. Starknet is preparing for quantum threats, not claiming to be done with them & owning the timing is what makes that preparation practical. [ quantum.starkware.co/ ]

Good morning Lovelies….. 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘀. Imagine a skyscraper where every door lock was welded into the steel frame during construction. The day a better lock pick appears, replacing 1 lock means moving every tenant out at once. @Starknet separates 2 jobs that most chains bundle together. ▸ Signatures authorise a transaction, like the lock on a door ▸ STARK proofs verify the computation, like an inspector checking the work inside. $STARK proofs are hash based, so they rest on a different foundation from the elliptic curve assumptions behind many signature schemes. With native account abstraction, every account is a programmable smart contract, so new signature methods can be added at the account level without a network wide upgrade. Each account still has to make that move itself. @Starknet is also an L2 on Ethereum, so part of its security depends on Ethereum’s cryptography and migration timeline. That is why Starknet is exploring an independent L1, so it has more say over when core security upgrades happen. Starknet is preparing for quantum threats, not claiming to be done with them. Systems that can swap 1 piece at a time have options, and rigid ones have deadlines. The StarkWare Quantum Hub assesses eight capabilities for changing cryptography. Counts reflect public evidence within its defined scope. Check [ quantum.starkware.co/ ]….