Sharing the opinions of a black conservative.
Joined October 2018
- Tweets19.6K
- Following240
- Followers5.1K
- Likes18K
Black Tea News retweeted
Thread Analysis of the Blue Tsunami
Past trends always made it likely that the GOP was headed for a rough election night this week. But the historic blowout we saw on Tuesday goes far beyond anything that trend alone could explain. There were plenty of real reasons for the results, and it’s important to understand them in order to assess voter concerns properly. While everyone will focus on their preferred spin to push narratives, all of these factors played a role:
Black Tea News retweeted
To everyone fuming at @haleyforMI endorsing @mikerogersforMI: Hurt people hurt people.
Black Tea News retweeted
"Without providing evidence?"
El-Sayed literally signed a letter in 2012 in support of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. His campaign refuses to explain it.
His sister said his family was MB. His father in law, who is a founding member of ISNA -- an offshoot of the MB -- donated hundreds of thousands to his campaign. There is not a single anti-MB measure he supports.
He says about Islamic terrorists trying to murder Jewish kindergarteners, "Hurt people hurt people," and equates Dearborn-based terrorists trying to kill schoolkids with the IDF's targeted killing of Hezbollah members.
He was caught on tape during this campaign saying he wouldn't say anything about Ayatollah Khamenei's death because too many of his constituents were upset about it.
He campaigns with Hasan Piker, who says Hamas is better than Israel and speaks warmly of Hezbollah.
There is no more thoroughly sourced claim in politics than that El-Sayed is sympathetic to radical Islam and connected to Islamic extremists.
Black Tea News retweeted
From Michigan to Colorado to Washington, D.C., antisemitic violence has touched communities across the country. The American Tour Against Hate is taking a stand. Stop the hate. End the violence.
Black Tea News retweeted
When Islamists fight you, it is resistance.
When you fight them back, it is "genocide."
Black Tea News retweeted
Are these people for real? I absolutely know what this is. It is an emergency radio button. These people are absolutely RETARDED.
When you press the emergency button on their radio while evacuating Charlie immediately after he was shot, there would be a straightforward operational reason:
the situation had instantly become a life-threatening emergency, and the man's hands and attention would likely have been occupied with moving and protecting the wounded person, watching for additional threats, and getting to a safer location.
On professional radio systems, an emergency-button activation can immediately alert dispatch, identify the radio initiating the emergency, and-depending on programming-give that radio priority communications or activate a “hot mic,” allowing audio to transmit without the officer continually holding the push-to-talk button. YOU FRIGGIN MORONS.
Motorola specifically documents configurations in which pressing the emergency button sends the alarm and gives the radio priority access, as well as configurations where the microphone automatically activates for a programmed period.
SORRY IDIOTS, YOU LOSE.................AGAIN.
Black Tea News retweeted
This is a child in Brazil who is suffering from a congenital condition.
Never before has a movement lied and used children so dishonestly.
Israeli occupation military did killed her family and stole her hand and legs..
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The child in this video is Brian Freitas, a Brazilian boy from Goiânia born with a congenital condition leaving him without one arm and both legs. It is not a Palestinian girl injured by Israeli forces.
instagram.com/reel/C90B9poOK…
omatogrossense.com/imagens-de-cri…
Black Tea News retweeted
The problem is these conspiracy idiots make stuff up daily. People then take time to debunk it. They never apologize or retract, but instead throw the next piece of feces at the wall and demand someone else prove them wrong.
They don’t care about the truth.
🚨 1/ Bret Weinstein, Jimmy Dore, and John Cullen are telling millions of people that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by an Israeli gun drone launched from a U.S. Army spy plane.
Their theory: N1098L, a Bombardier Global 6500 they claim is part of the Army's HADES program, acted as a mothership. It launched an Elbit "Bird of Prey" rifle mount hung under a multirotor, armed with a Barrett REC10. The drone hovered about 110 feet over the UVU Science Building and fired the shot. The man on the Losee Center roof was a decoy. Two low passes over Provo on September 10 were the drop-off and the pickup.
Weinstein calls the evidence "credible" and "persuasive."
Dore: "That is the most logical and compelling hypothesis of how they killed Charlie Kirk."
So I pulled it apart. 1.4 million position reports across 643 days of flight data, the aircraft's FAA file, the Provo Tower tapes, the drone specs, and the hearing transcript.
The plane has no ISR equipment and no drone launch capability. And it has flown that same low pass 396 times at 103 airports.
@BretWeinstein
@jimmy_dore
@I_Am_JohnCullen
Every significant claim you make is wrong. Here's how. 👇
Black Tea News retweeted
Ben Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew who encourages people to go to church, but Tucker tried to blame him for porn, gambling, usury, & addiction because Ben did a Kalshi ad.
All while Tucker defends porn producers, sells nicotine products, partners with gambling investors, and advertises shady mortgage companies.
It's almost as if his criticisms have little to do with those issues...
Black Tea News retweeted
🚨Candace Owens for nearly a year: “There's NOT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE against Tyler Robinson"
VS.
Judge Tony Graf today: "The state's evidence is SUBSTANTIAL”
The judge outlined:
• Robinson's DNA identified as a major contributor on multiple parts of the alleged murder weapon
• Toolmark evidence connecting an engraving cutter recovered from Robinson's residence to ammunition found in the rifle
• Robinson's DNA on the screwdriver recovered from the crime scene
• Surveillance tracking a suspect matching Robinson's physical attributes, clothing, shoes and distinctive gait to and from the rooftop
• Doorbell footage allegedly capturing Robinson's distinctive vehicle nearby
• Messages attributed to Robinson allegedly admitting: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I took it.”
• A subsequent Discord message allegedly stating: “It was me at UVU yesterday.”
The judge's conclusion:
“This evidence is sufficient at this stage to support a reasonable belief that defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk.”
Candace Owens and her cult actively refuse to live in the real world.
Black Tea News retweeted
This is your weekly reminder that Candace has not told her followers that she’s asked for a DISMISSAL in the Harpole case.
Because she’s JUST A PODCASTER that uses RHETORICAL HYPERBOLE that shouldn’t be taken SERIOUSLY.
Nor has she told them that she hasn’t given Mitch the fundraiser money. So in Mitchs dismissal paperwork he had to go pro se (DEFEND HIMSELF).
Mitch states he can’t be held accountable for the conspiracy theories that Candace came up with because she did it after he left. (He’s been spreading the same theories so that won’t hold up in court).
And she hasn’t told them they Harpole filed a response to Mitch’s dismissal stating that Candace and Mitch FABRICATED the story of him being there and Mitch was promised the money from the fundraiser for it.
I still owe everyone the recap on all the filings. I’ll do that later.
Black Tea News retweeted
It should come as a shock to nobody with a functioning brain that @RealCandaceO DID NOT get her tip about Tyler Robinson allegedly in Panguitch via a call from ANYONE at Cowboys Smokehouse.
Here is what happened and it is the truth: When Charlie was shot, the owner Ralph, was out of town. He came back the FOLLOWING Tuesday, and the FEMALE server told him she thinks but is not sure that a young male who was in the Smokehouse that night may have been Tyler Robinson.
Ralph contacted a Sherriff FRIEND OF HIS asking what he should do. The Sherriff friend helped Ralph to reach out to the @fbi. The FBI DID IN FACT come down to the Smokehouse and interview the relevant people involved in the case and the RECEIPT was provided to the FBI.
There was NO CREDIT CARD USED, that person either used a debit card of Apple Pay or something similar as Ralph would have been able to pull up the name of the person if they had used a credit card. So, here are people doing their civic duty, reporting a lead. They NEVER REACHED OUT TO CANDACE OWENS. NOPE.
They were not in this for fame, not in it for free advertising, nothing. They do not want to be a part of this, but they keep dragging them back in. Ralph talks to me because I have kept my word with him, I have never printed anything he has not wanted printed and he knows I will absolutely do what I promise.
Anyway, Panguitch being a small town, word got out that Tyler might have eaten at the Smokehouse, the local conspiracy lady, in her mid 70's, who is known to be into conspiracies of all kinds called Candace Owens. SHE GAVE CANDACE OWENS RALPH'S NUMBER. So, here is Ralph driving down the street when Candace Owens called and he told her the exact same story I am telling you, but he told her that the female server was just not sure, she thinks it could have been him, nobody ever told her they were 100% sure about the identification.
When the FBI came, THEY were given the original receipt. Fox 13 in Utah did a story and that is what got this out to National news. The FBI said they would be in touch if in fact the receipt came back as Tyler Robinson, they never got back to him, the defense has NEVER CALLED THEM and today I found out that the FBI has confirmed that the receipt did not belong to Tyler Robinson.
It is my understanding that @DiligentDenizen has been told same. Which would explain why he is now attempting to say that the DEFENSE is in on a scam to blame it on Tyler. What did he say, they are Government Cheese? Give me a break. If anyone has that clip from Spaces, please send it to me so I can forward that VIA PROCESS SERVER TO THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY. Perhaps she will sue him for defamation.
Anyway, @RealCandaceO I am a big fan, love the show, it is my favorite fictional series ever. But this next part you are not going to like so much, Tyler Robinson has been CONFIRMED as not eating at the Steakhouse. Also, The Discord confession? Yeah, that is true ahs well. How do I know? I interviewed a friend who was part of that chat. ....OH, I almost forgot, I got permission to give Andrew Wilson a witness phone number, if you don't hear me, you certainly will hear him. Cheers!!! @paleochristcon
Oh, for the cultists who get mad at me just because I am speaking truth, you need to deal with it, because something is becoming really clear...........
Black Tea News retweeted
Then it should be very easy for you to explain how and why you disagree with him, and why it was a mistake to campaign with him. But you're not doing any of that. Because you agree with him, obviously.
U.S. Sen. candidate @AbdulElSayed (D-MI) on Hasan Piker: "You would think, if you turned on any media, that this whole campaign is about a streamer in California. That's not what this campaign has ever been about."
Black Tea News retweeted
As usual, here’s what’s not included in this headline.
He has an extensive criminal history & prison stints including multiple felony weapons convictions and drug convictions as well as probation violations in two different states.
All of which was after his deployment to Iraq.
Veteran who served 3 tours in Iraq War facing possible deportation. nbcnews.com/news/us-news/vet…
Black Tea News retweeted
Tucker’s favorite guest/historian lamenting that people don’t spend enough time listening to those who are pro-Hitler.
But remember it’s about Israel or something.
Black Tea News retweeted
Some cutting edge touch DNA research sheds more light on how deposition conditions can affect degradation.
A study published last month in a premier forensic DNA journal has shown that most touch DNA isn't composed of skin cells at all. The majority of touch DNA is made up of neutrophils - a type of nucleated white blood cell. Neutrophils are highly concentrated in saliva and nasal secretions (as well as in blood) and are excellent sources of DNA.
Neutrophils are also very fragile and short-lived. As part of the body's immune system, they are programmed to self destruct by shooting their DNA at intruders like bacteria, viruses, or fungi like a sticky trap. (This is why your snot gets thick when you get a cold). A neutrophil that doesn't encounter an intruder will still die a rapid programmed death (apoptosis) that will fragment its nuclear DNA within a short period of time (generally, hours) unless conditions allow its DNA to be preserved.
Dry conditions slow the enzymatic activity that fragments DNA during cell death. With saliva in particular, air drying also helps protect the DNA because the dehydrated proteins it contains form a shield around the deposit, giving it additional protection from environmental insults.
Humid conditions, on the other hand, allow both internal and external decay processes to continue or accelerate. Moisture control drives many evidence collection standards for this reason, such as storing evidence with possible biological materials in paper rather than plastic bags and air-drying wet items before packaging them.
This new paradigm of touch DNA being leucocyte-based also sheds light on why there is so much variability in both quality and quantity of touch DNA samples. This well-known variability is precisely why the DOJ's uniform language policy, which we heard extensive testimony about in Tyler Robinson's preliminary hearing, prohibits analysts from federal agencies from making claims about timing or manner of deposition solely based on the quantity or quality of DNA present.
If the primary mechanism for depositing touch DNA is through transfered mouth and nose secretions, then face-touching habits, volume of secretions, and handwashing frequency and thoroughness can all be expected to play a role in the quantity and quality of touch DNA deposits.
Feel free to fact check all this.
Here's the recent study: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
“TYLER’S DNA IS MORE DEGRADED”
More recently deposited DNA can be more degraded than older DNA on the same item. Absolute time is not the dominant factor.
Why this happens:
DNA degradation is driven primarily by environmental conditions after deposition, not by how long the DNA has been there. Key drivers include:
• Heat
• Moisture / humidity cycles
• UV exposure
• Microbial and enzymatic activity
• Substrate chemistry (especially metals)
• Whether the deposit stayed wet or dried quickly
Fresh biological material (especially moist touch DNA or skin cells) often degrades fastest in the first hours to days while enzymes and bacteria are still active.
Once a deposit fully dries, degradation usually slows dramatically. An older deposit that dried quickly and remained protected can therefore be better preserved than a newer one that stayed damp longer, was re-wetted, or was exposed to harsher conditions.
Metal surfaces (common on firearms) add another variable. Some metals, particularly those containing copper, can accelerate DNA damage through chemical interactions. Persistence and quality of recovered DNA vary significantly by the specific metal, surface condition, and micro-environment.
Touch DNA is also inherently more variable and often lower-quantity/more fragmented than DNA from blood, semen, or saliva. Recent brief handling can leave less DNA, or DNA that is more vulnerable, than older, more substantial deposits.
Application to a rifle (Tyler Robinson context)
On a rifle recovered outdoors (or stored/handled in varying conditions), several forensic realities apply:
• Multiple contributors are common on firearms (owner, prior handlers, secondary transfer, manufacturing, etc.).
• DNA attributed to a recent handler (e.g., the person who last used or discarded the rifle) can show greater degradation if that contact involved brief handling, outdoor exposure, moisture, or a less protective micro-environment than earlier deposits.
• Older DNA (from prior ownership, handling by family members, or earlier contact) may have dried and stabilized under more favorable conditions, or been deposited in higher quantity/better-protected locations on the gun.
• Secondary transfer, shared residence DNA (roommate, family), and substrate effects can produce mixtures where relative degradation levels do not track chronological order of contact.
In short: degradation level does not reliably indicate which DNA was deposited most recently. Environmental history, deposit type (touch vs. other), quantity, substrate interactions, and post-deposition conditions control the outcome far more than elapsed time. This is a standard limitation in forensic DNA interpretation of mixed traces on handled objects such as firearms.
Source: Grok
Query: Can more recent deposited DNA be more degraded than older DNA? Why would Tyler’s DNA, who had recent contact, be more degraded than some of the other people’s DNA on his rifle?
Black Tea News retweeted
With all due respect, I don't think you're looking at the evidence in the Tyler Robinson case rationally or objectively.
We probably agree on many issues outside of this, and I appreciate much of the work you've done. But the evidence here is overwhelming.
Tyler Robinson was the major DNA contributor on the rifle, towel, and screwdriver.
The rifle DNA was at least 1 trillion to 1. Robinson accounted for 95% of the DNA mixture on the towel and 89% on the screwdriver.
People are also drawing false conclusions from Robinson's DNA being more degraded. That does not mean other people touched the rifle after him.
Robinson is the primary DNA contributor on the rifle.
The ATF toolmark analysis could not conclusively match the recovered bullet to the rifle because the bullet was too fragmented. That happens with badly fragmented bullets. They were still able to determine it was a .30-caliber-class bullet, consistent with Robinson's rifle.
Investigators collected the evidence before releasing the crime scene.
Candace herself released a photo showing Robinson's face, wearing the same hat and maroon shirt, near the murder scene shortly after the killing.
His parents identified him in the footage. His boyfriend identified him. Robinson also identified himself.
The “bald man with three passengers” claim comes from an eyewitness recollection.
The objective evidence points to Tyler Robinson: the video shows only one person getting out of the car and returning to it; a police officer encountered the vehicle and believed the male driver was Robinson; the partial plate matched Robinson's Challenger; Robinson was simultaneously texting that he was sitting in his car near campus trying to recover his rifle; he even complained about how loud the crickets were, and those loud crickets are heard on the Ring-camera footage; and his cellphone data shows a Google Maps route from that same location, next to the rifle stash point, directly back to his home.
The defense received Robinson's forensic cellphone data in March. They've had the metadata and digital evidence from Verizon, Google, Gmail, Apple iCloud, Discord, and other sources for months.
Joe Kent ran the NCTC, which is an intelligence analysis and coordination body. It is not an investigative agency and does not have subpoena power.
I think there is credible evidence that Kent may have been leaking information to Candace that helped fuel Candace's narrative that Israel, France, and Egypt were involved.
Meanwhile, there is far stronger evidence of a left-wing ideological motive tied directly to Robinson. He was dating a trans furry, wrote "Hey fascist! Catch!" on his ammunition, and said Charlie spread too much hate.
You can keep moving the goalposts and nitpicking individual details, but you cannot logically explain away the totality of the evidence.
Robinson's defense hasn't even attempted to.
If Robinson's defense had a legitimate alibi or compelling evidence that someone else committed the murder, you would expect them to use it to challenge probable cause before the case is bound over for trial.
I don't think they have a solid alibi because the evidence overwhelmingly points to Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk.
That’s called hearsay. We all watched the same preliminary hearing. What EXACTLY is he basing that opinion on? The multiple DNA’s found? The inconclusive ATF report? The fact that the crime scene and key evidence was essentially destroyed? The fact that not a single camera angle showing Tyler Robinsons face has been made public? The fact that two witnesses Mr. And Mrs. Noble saw a BALD man driving the vehicle SBI agent David Hull said was driven by Tyler? The fact that no metadata has been submitted to verify when the text “confessions” were sent, from what device, or that they were even sent by Tyler? The fact that the FBI blocked Joe Kent from investigating foreign ties? I mean how the actual f*ck is this prosecutor calling this the strongest murder case he’s seen? Maybe he’s a dirty prosecutor and someone should start doing a deep dive into his track record and the cases he’s prosecuted because the Tyler Robinson case has more red flags than I can keep count of.
Black Tea News retweeted
Just a few of the mistakes @RealCandaceO made in the debate about the #TylerRobinson case:
1/ She didn't know most of the evidence admitted at the hearing would be admitted at trial;
2/ She didn't know Robinson is also charged with murder, not just aggravated murder;
3/ She didn't know the difference b/t DNA and fingerprints;
4/ She didn't know that "degraded" DNA has nothing to do w/ the timing of the DNA's presence on the gun;
5/ She didn't know that dirt being inside the rifle does not prove anything about when the rifle was used;
6/ She didn't know Tyler confessed to being the person on the surveillance footage;
7/ She didn't know Twiggs identified Tyler as the person on the surveillance footage;
8/ She didn't know Twiggs had every incentive to testify truthfully due to his use immunity agreement;
9/ She didn't know defense lawyers have every incentive to advance her theories at the preliminary hearing, but chose not to b/c they know her theories are not backed up by evidence;
10/ She didn't know the difference between speculation and reliable hearsay under Utah rules.