Legal/financial background, researcher by choice.
Joined November 2024
- Tweets21.3K
- Following831
- Followers6.1K
- Likes15.7K
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
How would you feel if you had been locked up, without bail, for nearly 4 years based upon what your spouse said?
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
To those who believe Lindsay Clancy is guilty - when you take away her attorney’s strategy and the false claim that she confessed, what is your opinion based on? 🤷♀️
All that remains is uncorroborated, self serving statements from her husband. Supporting that process is advocating against your own constitutional rights.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
A question for those who believe Lindsay Clancy is guilty. When you take away the false claim that she confessed, what actual evidence supports your opinion?
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
Two weeks ago I dropped this first $10,000 challenge on the TOD for the Clancy children and it remains completely untouched.
Since my money is so incredibly safe from the pitchfork brigade, I just dropped a new $10,000 challenge an hour ago to see if anyone can prove they were alive at 5:15.
That’s $20,000 total on the table. My bank account has never felt more secure. 🏦
THE CLANCY CASE:
THE $10,000 CHALLENGE
$10,000 to the first person who can show me where, during the trial, the prosecution proved TOD for both Cora and Dawson. This is not the later pronouncement at the hospital.
Send the trial day and the transcript page(s). If it is the page(s) where they proved TOD for both inside the house, I pay. If it is not, I don’t.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
@MattWalshBlog and @NancyMace have posted about Lindsay incessantly so surely this would be an easy $10,000 for either of them.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
THE CLANCY CASE:
THE SECOND $10,000 CHALLENGE
$10,000 to the first person who can show me where, during the trial, the prosecution proved that the children were alive when Patrick allegedly left the house at 5:15.
Send the trial day and the transcript page(s). If it is the page(s) where they proved the children were alive at that time, I pay. If it is not, I don’t.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
The Anatomy of a Five-Day Tenure
The downfall of Katie Zacharia was a masterclass in what happens when deception takes the wheel.
It started with a fundamental lie - claiming to be a lawyer when she had never passed the bar.
Instead of correcting the record, she manufactured new lies, and used minimization and deceit to avoid the truth.
Nobody doubts her deep loyalty to President Trump. But in the end, protecting her manufactured identity took priority above all else.
She was given multiple opportunities to choose the truth. While she might have recovered from the original error, her continuous pattern of evasion and total refusal to take accountability made a comeback impossible.
Integrity matters, and once you completely destroy it, there's no coming back.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
If you discovered your partner outside in the freezing cold with completely soaked clothing and hair, wouldn't you share that detail at some point during your 911 call? 🤷♀️
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
She created the situation.
She lied.
She continued to lie.
She deflected, minimized, and deceived. This is a lack of integrity.
Why the reluctance to call it what it is?
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
Why not call it for what it is?
She lied.
She lied to cover up the original lie.
She lied about why she lied to cover up the original lie.
Team jersey should never trump the truth. Yet, here we are and it’s not good for any of us.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
The moment we start defending a lack of integrity just because they wear our team's jersey, we have completely lost our moral compass.
At that point, truth doesn't matter anymore - only the tribe matters. That is a dangerous, broken way to live.
She lied.
She lied again and again.
She deceived.
She deflected.
She minimized.
Her focus was her fabricated image and it trumped all else. Why not call it what it is?
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
Mistakes are manageable; a pattern of deception is not. Had the choice been made to stand by the truth from the beginning, the outcome likely would have been completely different.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
She lied.
That’s it.
What is there to debate?
Anyone protecting her from the consequences by trying to rewrite definitions is saying her lies matter more than the truth.
If that is your standard, it is not a standard you should want, and it is not a standard anyone else should accept.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
There is nothing independent that shows Lindsay killed her children.
No witness saw it.
No video captured it.
No fingerprints on the bands.
DNA doesn’t identify her as the murderer.
She never told the police anything.
She never signed anything.
She never got on the stand.
The whole thing is what Patrick said and her own lawyers writing a story into a lawsuit and then running an insanity defense on top of it.
That’s the entire case.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
Words matter.
Calling yourself a lawyer when what you are is a law school graduate, does not make you a lawyer. It makes you a liar.
Just like calling yourself a woman when you are a man, does not make you a woman.
Words are not fluid.
Arguing against one fluid definition and supporting another makes you a hypocrite.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
Forcing a partner to sever ties with their mother is an incredibly toxic move. It is a glaring signal of deep insecurity, control issues, and toxic emotional manipulation. It is the ultimate signal to walk away, because you would be marrying the chaotic psychological warfare they bring with them.
(Note: If the parent were abusive or dangerous, someone in their 30s would’ve cut ties long before the fiancé.)
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
Have any news organizations or influencers had the humility to step back and ask:
Were we misled by the headlines?
Did we get the Clancy case wrong?
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
It’s an interesting strategy to imply you passed the Chinese bar exam, which is not possible for a US citizen, to avoid admitting you never passed a US bar exam.
@KatieZacharia didn't just misrepresent herself to the public - she lied to the man who gave her the job and let him take the hit for her on day two. That is the exact opposite of having the President's best interests at heart @WhiteHouse.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
It’s an interesting strategy to imply you passed the Chinese bar exam, which is not possible for a US citizen, to avoid admitting you never passed a US bar exam.
@KatieZacharia didn't just misrepresent herself to the public - she lied to the man who gave her the job and let him take the hit for her on day two. That is the exact opposite of having the President's best interests at heart @WhiteHouse.
Truth Is Freedom retweeted
If you don't have the communication skills to handle a briefing room, if you mislead people about your credentials, and if you can't evaluate basic evidence objectively, you are simply the wrong person for the job.
After I watched Katie Zacharia’s first briefing I was…uncomfortable. She would read from her notes, stop and smile, go back to the notes, stop and smile again. It never settled into anything that felt like she was actually talking to the room.
And only three questions for a total of 14 minutes? Karoline Leavitt's first press conference lasted over 45 minutes, and she confidently handled dozens of aggressive, unscripted questions from the entire room. Yes, we were spoiled by Karoline.
I tried to stay open. It was only her second day and nerves are normal. I understand that. But shouldn’t someone in this position at least be able to walk out, introduce themselves, and not simply read from a script? If the opening is that stilted, how does the necessary skill set just suddenly appear?
Then I learned she had been calling herself an attorney on television for years. Public records show she never passed the bar or held a license in any state. That is a problem on its own. Not having the license is one thing. Using the title is another.
After that I still went and looked for some of her earlier segments. Thinking maybe I would find a piece that conveyed the absent skill set from yesterday. I wasn’t looking specifically for the Lindsay Clancy case, but there it was.
@KatieZacharia comments in this segment had no sign of legal analysis. She immediately adopted the culture-war framing - another political pundit unknowingly advocating to diminish our constitutional rights.
If you don't have the communication skills to handle a briefing room, if you mislead people about your credentials, and if you can't evaluate basic evidence objectively, you are simply the wrong person for the job @WhiteHouse.