A six-year media campaign before a trial even begins was to program the jurors to see the accuser as victim because ‘lack of evidence’
UK does not have a comprehensive jury selection process (voir dire) to weed out biased jurors.
So therefore Brand guilty before trial starts
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Replying to @RealTheForce
We live in the system they built
The eugenic machine
The turning cogs
The human chains
They don’t hide in the shadows
It’s their matrix, in plain sight
When all see this, the cogs will stop
Reset
And start again!
Awareness
Karma
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Replying to @JaymieIcke
Russell brand was Targeted for his views—- so why is nobody saying that about David Williams’
Because Williams doesn’t have any!
The dots having breakdown?!
Pull it together lad
Awareness
Karma
The prosecution, channel 4 all knew it was going to be a ‘hear say’ trial, hence 6 years of programming
They needed to convince the jury before the trial started that the accuser was the ‘victim’
Meaning it was 100% guaranteed that Brand is found guilty
Awareness
Karma
Anyone speaking out about the eugenic system and making money are ⚙️
Different farmers provide different grass, that’s all
99.999% human population still 🐑 or ⛓️💥
When the 🐑 see
The ⛓️💥 will break and stop the machine
Reset
And start again!
Awareness
Karma
1
44
So In the trial of Russell vrs establishment
It’s was revealed Brand text the accuser when he saw the accuser at a festival in Edinburgh
It amazed me that the accuser hadn’t blocked her demon or got a new number!
Awareness
Karma
1
2
61
If the jury is brainwashed to think the accuser is the victim before trial then what was the trial for?!
🐑
Awareness
Karma
1
70
Right now the uk government is on a campaign
Feed their flock
All woman accursed are ‘brave victims’
Programming their 🐑 for jury service
Jury service picked by the ballot box!
Awareness
Karma
1
62
Russell Brand's trial revealed that he texted ‘accuser’ after spotting her at the Edinburgh Festival months after the alleged rape
Why hadn’t she blocked her alleged attacker?!
Apparently she got raped and traumatized but didn’t block his number
Rather kept it
Awareness
Karma
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Imagine a chick that ate your ass in a comedy club bathroom successfully convincing people 20 years later that you raped her.
Wild.
You can put Russell Brand in prison, lady.
But you can’t uneat his ass.
Just asking
If that stock up bs is actually just to allow a window for them parasites to retreat to bunkers
Is the vaxed 🧟♀️ apocalypse the reason?
If so
What do I call them?
Am I allowed to kill them?
My neighbor took a jab and I really don’t like him 😊
Awareness
Karma
2
35
So brand by name and nature has been extinguished or has he?
Memoirs from a prison cell might work?
So it’s clear to see the house was setup to win
Does appeal lead to innocence and therefore no old crimes can no longer be prosecuted?!
Uk join eu without the brand noise?
1
48
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Replying to @pmclauth
The trial was a gaslighting, a fireworks show,
the new son of religion to be crucified, ironically
There isn’t any victims without evidence
The accuser protected from the first minute, deliberately so to protect cross examination and character assassination
Parasites
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Replying to @Lady_Nickeh
Tell me something about the accuser?
The accuser cant be a victim until it’s proven to have happened!
So why was the accuser treated like this?
The trial was gaslighting
The verdict was decided way before court
It’s not easy to tell a stupid person they are stupid
So I wont
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Replying to @OffGuardian0
The accuser could have been a whore and had anal sex all her life, but the veil and restriction regarding that information meant it was Brand against the house
The house always wins
Anyone talking like Andy pants is a retard
Awareness
Karma
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Replying to @Lady_Nickeh
These texts were not used in the trial
Brand was guilty by media, before the trial even began
They influenced public, therefore the jury for years
What do they know about the accuser?
Do they know she loves anal sex and never uses condoms?
They didn’t meet ex-boyfriend’s?
Cancer is an effect not the cause retweeted
Regarding Russell brand, a brand name all knew
I heard, read comments like ‘he was a wrong en’
Bet some on jury service thought that too
But the accuser, were they a wrong en’?
That’s the point, no one knows
Veiled up and ID unknown
Plus
Jury would think victim

