still clicking. Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Trenches
Joined January 2022
- Tweets5.2K
- Following4.8K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes50.8K
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
france is burning
uk wanting to send kids to war
diesel costs me 2x more than last year, 4x the year before
list goes on…
and all i can think about is $wallet being a robinhood stealth launch in the process of unveiling and the retards on ct don’t even know it’s going to $10b + 😭
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
$WALLET New Banger Crumb loading, which include @vladtenev, history evidence of connection,within few hours stay tuned and follow for more updates on $WALLET 😌
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
I decoded two transactions. It blew my mind.
Hank (@Hank69Moody) posted a route using NVDA/SPCX stock-token liquidity to buy $WALLET. I checked the decoded logs myself. (follow him for crazy alpha, he's the man)
What the transaction actually contains:
→ NVDA token (tokenized NVIDIA)
→ SPCX token (tokenized SpaceX)
→ USDG (Robinhood Chain's settlement stablecoin)
→ $WALLET (LaunchToken)
→ WETH (routing asset)
The route:
USDG → WETH → NVDA → SPCX → $WALLET → USDG
Executed through ElfomoFi, with fees paid in USDG.
Why this matters:
This isn't a random meme swap. This is a liquidity route connecting three layers of the Robinhood ecosystem:
Tokenized stocks (NVDA, SPCX)
USDG (official settlement)
Both transactions confirm the same pattern: external parties (ElfomoFi, OKX) trade $WALLET via routes that connect to Robinhood's infrastructure. One route uses stock tokens as a source of liquidity, while the other uses USDG directly.
One transaction is the most important one. It uses NVDA and SPCX liquidity, Robinhood’s tokenized stocks, as a route to purchase $WALLET. That is no coincidence. It is a liquidity path that has been deliberately set up.
I've seen enough now.
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
This is a big deal.
This is what the evidence led me too as well: $wallet is the rails for rh tokenized stock trading. Its not gas. Its the currency. Period.
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
(1/20) 🧵Thread: $wallet update: most notable NEW findings
9 - 16 October⬇️
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
Honestly, with a wind up wedge like this…
I feel like its higher risk to NOT have a bag of $wallet
Dont be underexposed.
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
With the new $WALLET research today
$WALLET is directly connected to many of the Robinhood Infra Partners
1. Alchemy
Smart-account and paymaster software used in the WALLET gas-payment transaction
2. 0x Protocol
Swap settlement infrastructure used in the WALLET transaction
3. Chainlink
Reported shared upstream funding path between the WALLET launcher and LINK deployer
4. LI.FI
WALLET recognized in its token metadata
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
It other words, the Robinhood developers launched one token named $WALLET then used that token as a transaction discount token / gas fee token on Robinhood Chain.
I see three potential outcomes:
1) Robinhood publicly says $WALLET is not theirs and they will never use the token. The token then goes to $0
2) Nothing is ever said and no actions are taken so the token just floats around the current $16m market cap as a memecoin then likely slowly dies off
3) Robinhood comes out and states that they are going to use the $WALLET token as a utility token to pay for gas fees or discounts on Robinhood Chain. If this happens it is very likely going to $10b+ based on other exchanges launching fee discount tokens and their valuations
So hypothetically here is what could happen in those 3 scenarios:
1) goes to $0
2) goes to $0
3) goes up 564x ($10b market cap)
This is called asymmetry. Worst case scenario it goes to $0. Best case it goes up 500x+. If I risk a small % and it goes to $0, it barely impacts the portfolio. If the best case plays out, it meaningfully impacts the portfolio. This is how VC's think and invest.
Not financial advice. I just think this storyline and potential is fascinating.
🚨 $WALLET ON-CHAIN BOMBSHELL 🚨
We uncovered 90 SUCCESSFUL gas-sponsored operations on Robinhood Chain, a recurring 0.85% swap fee, and a shared WALLET fee collector.
Not speculation. Actual blockchain transactions.
Here’s what we found 🧵👇
1/7 — 90 REAL GAS-SPONSORED OPERATIONS ⛽
Our full-chain investigation identified:
✅ 90/90 successful ERC-4337 user operations
✅ 22 distinct smart accounts
✅ 177.08 $WALLET charged for gas sponsorship
✅ Same paymaster across all 90
This is demonstrable token utility.
🔗 Paymaster:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 Example transaction:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
2/7 — ONE COLLECTION WALLET. 90 TRANSACTIONS. 👀
Every single sponsored transaction involved WALLET transfers to the SAME address.
💰 489.41 $WALLET received across these transactions.
And here’s the interesting part:
The collector had no deployed contract code and zero outgoing account transactions when checked.
🔗 Collector:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
Who configured this recurring collection arrangement?
3/7 — THE 0.85% FEE DISCOVERY 🔥
We decoded two transactions showing the exact same fee structure.
Transaction A:
• 23,941.22 WALLET swap output
• 203.500361 WALLET collected
• Exactly 0.85%
Transaction B:
• 1,212.50 WALLET swap output
• 10.306215 WALLET collected
• Exactly 0.85%
Both sent the fee to the SAME address.
🔗 TX A:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 TX B:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
4/7 — GAS FEES AND SWAP FEES ARE SEPARATE ⚡
Across the 90 transactions:
⛽ 177.08 WALLET — recorded gas sponsorship
💰 312.32 WALLET — additional transfers to collector
Total: 489.41 WALLET.
In 42 transactions, the collector received more WALLET than the recorded gas charge.
This suggests the address supports a broader fee-collection workflow.
🔗 Paymaster:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
5/7 — THE FEE PARAMETER IS IN THE CALLDATA 🔍
Both decoded transactions contain:
• Same swap executor
• Same WALLET token
• Same collector
• Same 0x2134 parameter
0x2134 = 8,500.
On a 1,000,000-unit scale, that’s exactly 0.85%.
The parameter’s precise ABI meaning still needs confirmation, but the repeating pattern is hard to ignore.
🔗 Executor:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 WALLET contract:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
6/7 — ESTABLISHED INFRASTRUCTURE CONNECTIONS 🧩
The transactions involve:
⚙️ ERC-4337 account abstraction
⛽ An Alchemy-associated paymaster
🔄 0x Settler-style swap execution
💰 WALLET-denominated payments
This is not just a token sitting in wallets.
It’s being used in a functioning on-chain payment and trading workflow.
🔗 Paymaster owner:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 Swap executor:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
7/7 — THE BIG QUESTION REMAINS 👀
We have now verified:
✅ 90 successful sponsored operations
✅ Real WALLET gas-payment functionality
✅ Repeating 0.85% swap fees
✅ One shared collection address
✅ Established trading and paymaster infrastructure
The remaining missing piece is a verified control relationship between Robinhood’s operational wallets and this infrastructure.
The on-chain utility is real. The ownership mystery is still open.
Follow for the next findings. 🔎
$WALLET #RobinhoodChain #OnChain #ERC4337
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
🚨 $WALLET ON-CHAIN BOMBSHELL 🚨
We uncovered 90 SUCCESSFUL gas-sponsored operations on Robinhood Chain, a recurring 0.85% swap fee, and a shared WALLET fee collector.
Not speculation. Actual blockchain transactions.
Here’s what we found 🧵👇
1/7 — 90 REAL GAS-SPONSORED OPERATIONS ⛽
Our full-chain investigation identified:
✅ 90/90 successful ERC-4337 user operations
✅ 22 distinct smart accounts
✅ 177.08 $WALLET charged for gas sponsorship
✅ Same paymaster across all 90
This is demonstrable token utility.
🔗 Paymaster:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 Example transaction:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
2/7 — ONE COLLECTION WALLET. 90 TRANSACTIONS. 👀
Every single sponsored transaction involved WALLET transfers to the SAME address.
💰 489.41 $WALLET received across these transactions.
And here’s the interesting part:
The collector had no deployed contract code and zero outgoing account transactions when checked.
🔗 Collector:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
Who configured this recurring collection arrangement?
3/7 — THE 0.85% FEE DISCOVERY 🔥
We decoded two transactions showing the exact same fee structure.
Transaction A:
• 23,941.22 WALLET swap output
• 203.500361 WALLET collected
• Exactly 0.85%
Transaction B:
• 1,212.50 WALLET swap output
• 10.306215 WALLET collected
• Exactly 0.85%
Both sent the fee to the SAME address.
🔗 TX A:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 TX B:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
4/7 — GAS FEES AND SWAP FEES ARE SEPARATE ⚡
Across the 90 transactions:
⛽ 177.08 WALLET — recorded gas sponsorship
💰 312.32 WALLET — additional transfers to collector
Total: 489.41 WALLET.
In 42 transactions, the collector received more WALLET than the recorded gas charge.
This suggests the address supports a broader fee-collection workflow.
🔗 Paymaster:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
5/7 — THE FEE PARAMETER IS IN THE CALLDATA 🔍
Both decoded transactions contain:
• Same swap executor
• Same WALLET token
• Same collector
• Same 0x2134 parameter
0x2134 = 8,500.
On a 1,000,000-unit scale, that’s exactly 0.85%.
The parameter’s precise ABI meaning still needs confirmation, but the repeating pattern is hard to ignore.
🔗 Executor:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 WALLET contract:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
6/7 — ESTABLISHED INFRASTRUCTURE CONNECTIONS 🧩
The transactions involve:
⚙️ ERC-4337 account abstraction
⛽ An Alchemy-associated paymaster
🔄 0x Settler-style swap execution
💰 WALLET-denominated payments
This is not just a token sitting in wallets.
It’s being used in a functioning on-chain payment and trading workflow.
🔗 Paymaster owner:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 Swap executor:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
7/7 — THE BIG QUESTION REMAINS 👀
We have now verified:
✅ 90 successful sponsored operations
✅ Real WALLET gas-payment functionality
✅ Repeating 0.85% swap fees
✅ One shared collection address
✅ Established trading and paymaster infrastructure
The remaining missing piece is a verified control relationship between Robinhood’s operational wallets and this infrastructure.
The on-chain utility is real. The ownership mystery is still open.
Follow for the next findings. 🔎
$WALLET #RobinhoodChain #OnChain #ERC4337
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
Dug into this new $WALLET research and it’s verified that:
$WALLET was used to pay a gas related fee
$WALLET was explicitly configured as the payment token
The transactions interacted with swap infrastructure titled “RobinHoodSettler” 👀
HOLLLYYYY $WALLET 🔥🔥🔥
Until now, we knew people could buy, sell, and hold the token.
Now you’ve found evidence that $WALLET is actually being used to pay for blockchain services.
Here’s what it means:
1. $WALLET appears to have a real purpose. ⛽
You found 90 successful transactions where $WALLET was reportedly used to cover gas-related costs.
Think of it like paying a transaction fee with $WALLET instead of directly paying with ETH.
That means the token may have actual functionality beyond trading.
2. Someone appears to be collecting fees. 💰
Across those transactions, approximately 489 $WALLET went to one wallet address.
That suggests a system is set up to collect payments automatically.
3. There appears to be a consistent 0.85% swap fee.
Two transactions show the same percentage going to the same collector.
For example, on a $1,000 swap, a 0.85% fee would equal $8.50.
That looks like a structured fee system rather than random transfers.
4. Established blockchain technology is involved.
The transactions reportedly use infrastructure associated with Alchemy, 0x, and ERC-4337 smart wallets.
This suggests the system is technically more sophisticated than a basic meme token.
But anyone can potentially integrate these services. Their involvement doesn’t prove Robinhood is behind it.
🚨 Here’s the biggest takeaway
Someone appears to have built a working payment and fee-collection system around $WALLET.
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
We traced the wallet that deployed $WALLET on Robinhood Chain.
What we found spans YEARS: Robinhood-labeled wallets, cross-chain funding, direct wallet transfers, and Robinhood-associated swap routing.
Here are the RECEIPTS. 🧵👇
1/7 — THE ROBINHOOD HOT WALLET CONNECTION 🟢
June 2024: A wallet labeled Robinhood: Hot Wallet sent 0.026003 ETH directly to aa33.
This is the same aa33 address that later deployed $WALLET.
🔗 etherscan.io/tx/0xde945fb57a…
2/7 — NOT JUST ETH. USDC + LINK TOO. 👀
In 2025, aa33 received transfers from TWO Robinhood-labeled wallets: Robinhood Hot Wallet and Robinhood 7.
May 1 — LINK:
etherscan.io/tx/0x2b26a67fcd…
May 7 — LINK:
etherscan.io/tx/0x39a76ce448…
March 26 — USDC:
etherscan.io/tx/0xc617bd1632…
3/7 — THE ROBINHOOD SWAP IDENTIFIER 🏹
aa33 directly called LI.FI’s Diamond contract with the decoded integrator identifier:
robinhood-fees-enabled
Not just speculation — it’s recorded in transaction calldata.
🔗 eth.blockscout.com/tx/0x2d3a…
4/7 — THE f1a726 CONNECTION 🔍
Another wallet, f1a726, sent ETH directly to aa33 in April 2025.
That SAME wallet had previously received ETH from the Robinhood-labeled hot wallet.
f1a726 → aa33:
etherscan.io/tx/0x0380b0f755…
Robinhood-labeled wallet → f1a726:
etherscan.io/tx/0x6a1e81405a…
5/7 — WE TRACED aa33 BACK TO SOLANA. 🔥
A Solana trader bridged 49.575 USDC through Mayan in February 2025.
46.71894 USDC was minted directly to aa33 on Ethereum after bridge fees.
We identified the original Solana transaction AND its signer.
Solana:
solscan.io/tx/BSj2bQ5ZCMG4jU…
Ethereum:
etherscan.io/tx/0x86f9de6924…
6/7 — EIP-7702 + ROBINHOOD CHAIN ⚡
aa33 is also recorded with EIP-7702 smart-account delegation on Ethereum.
Then in July 2026, the address deployed $WALLET on Robinhood Chain.
aa33:
eth.blockscout.com/address/0…
$WALLET contract:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
7/7 — CONNECT THE DOTS. 👀🏹
✅ Robinhood-labeled ETH funding
✅ Robinhood-labeled USDC + LINK transfers
✅ robinhood-fees-enabled swap routing
✅ Direct f1a726 ↔ aa33 funding links
✅ Confirmed Solana → Ethereum funding
✅ EIP-7702 smart-account activity
✅ $WALLET deployment on Robinhood Chain
All verifiable on-chain.
But the history is worth investigating.
FOLLOW THE TRANSACTIONS. FOLLOW aa33. THE STORY ISN’T OVER. 🏹🔥
#$WALLET #Robinhood #HOOD #OnChain
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Today @lifiprotocol changed $wallet's token status as "verified". Yesterday it was "unverified".
Proof: li.quest/v1/token?chain=4663…
@lifiprotocol is day 1 partner of @RobinhoodCrypto, providing swaps, bridging, tokenized stock routing, and yield execution.
LI.FI's Token Screening enables a safer token discovery and trading experience across chains.
The feature is now live for all LI.FI integration partners - out of the box, with no integration changes required.
Read more: li.fi/knowledge-hub/introduc…
LouieLu (🪶, 🪶) retweeted
(1/7) 🧵 $wallet update 2 - 9 October: Most noteworthy findings: