English Britain was not a gift. We built it ourselves. Advocate for people of European descent. Nation first. Peace, not war - time to Restore.
Joined January 2023
- Tweets18.5K
- Following1.8K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes65K
P.R.I.A retweeted
UPDATE
Still no decision made on:
· Chester - 26/00673/FUL
· Havering - P1614.25
· Hastings - HS/FA/26/00140
· Salford - PA/2026/0832
· Brent – 23/3859
· Haringey - HGY/2026/2150
· Brent – 26/2007
· Newcastle UL - 26/00595/FUL
· Dacorum - 26/02025/FUL
· Brent – 26/2338
It's a good sign that Councils are delaying making a decision.
Kind regards,
Gavin
P.R.I.A retweeted
Alan Mendoza predicted that the Libyan intervention in 2011 would "expunge the ghosts of the Iraq War," and the Henry Jackson Society (which he has run for 20 years) said in 2012 that "Libya is not collapsing" and that "Libya’s militias are much less of a problem than sometimes portrayed in the international press." Libya subsequently descended into civil war, state collapse, became a safe haven for jihadists, and blew wide open a route for mass third-world immigration into Europe.
Mendoza was also a cheerleader for the toppling of Assad. In 2012, he signed an open letter to David Cameron advocating military intervention in Syria, including a no-fly zone, Turkish ground forces, and British supplies of weapons to Syrian rebels. During his tenure at HJS, the organisation also hosted an event entitled "Bringing Down the Last Dictatorship in Europe," concerning Belarus, and published proposals for bringing about regime collapse in Iran through military strikes, covert operations, and support for opposition groups. How’s that going?
He is the President of the Jewish National Fund UK, which has donated more than £1 million to HaShomer HaChadash, an organisation described by the Israeli media as "Israel’s largest militia," and has funded projects linked to Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
HJS was also exposed in 2017 for reportedly taking approximately £10,000 a month from the Japanese government to run a campaign influencing British political and media opinion against China. The organisation subsequently apologised to former Foreign Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind for failing to disclose relevant circumstances when seeking his involvement in an article concerning China.
For some inexplicable reason, Farage has chosen this man to be his "Chief Advisor on Global Affairs." According to Lois Perry, the head of Reform Friends of Israel (wtf?), he is in fact Reform’s "de facto shadow Foreign Secretary" (see recording below).
Under a Restore Britain government, the kind of lobbying Mendoza engages in will be curtailed, and those responsible for dragging Britain into disastrous foreign wars - and the migration waves, blowback terrorism, and tremendous cost in blood and treasure they have entailed - will be purged from the British state apparatus. Mendoza and his ilk would be pariahs.
I do not for one moment believe it is a coincidence that the Middle Eastern wars he so passionately cheerleads align so closely with Israeli foreign policy objectives. Whose interests does this guy actually serve?
Britain’s foreign policy must serve Britain, and Britain alone.
A nonsense argument. All the consequences of the Iran War would still have happened if he had magically found himself in charge of the UK when it broke out. The illusion he has created of being a man who can turn world events at his whim is entirely fake news. It betrays a complete lack of understanding about how international affairs actually function.
John Lewis have just proven the stereotype in every way without even realising.
Nope...not for me! 😠
This years John Lewis Christmas ad, in summary.
Nan needs a hug, rude kids barge past her, ignoring her completely.
Kids don't like Nans childhood presents, so Nan goes out shopping to John Lewis to buy things they like to placate them.
Nan eventually gets her hug, when the spoilt grandkids get the presents they want.
Oh, and a rickshaw ride round London for good measure!
An absolutely dreadful story of kids attitudes towards the elderly today, and blatant consumerism - I for one, won't be shopping there this year! 🎁 🎅🎄
The tougher Restore get the more I like them.
The political landscape right now:
Labour will reward the Boriswave with citizenship.
The Conservatives will do nothing about it.
Reform UK will allow Boriswave migrants to stay if they "benefit Britain."
Restore Britain will withdraw every Boriswave citizenship granted by Labour and reverse the whole thing.
Oh look, in group preference in the enclave.
P.R.I.A retweeted
Much nationalist critique of Jews focuses on Jews' role in bringing in third worlders over the last 80 years, but everyone should also know about how Jews first established themselves here and set the precedent others have made use of ever since. 'Our traditions of tolerance and openness...'
NEW VIDEO:
The Jewish Invasion of Britain
Mostly covering the decades of mass Jewish immigration to Britain from 1880-1914, the resurgence of anti-Semitism, the passage of the Aliens Act 1905 and Winston Churchill's attempts to sabotage the act
zoomerhistorian.substack.com…
P.R.I.A retweeted
Saving the 3rd world is neither possible nor is it in our interests. Get over your White saviour complex.
P.R.I.A retweeted
8 Afghans
6 of whom were transported across the Channel by Border Farce & the RNLI
2 came via lorries.
The case involves two children.
All the 'Refugees are Welcome' mob are guilty. As are those who knowingly help transport them into Britain.
eveningnews24.co.uk/news/266…
P.R.I.A retweeted
Hidden away on page 111 of the Budget - 'The government is providing £150 million capital investment in 2027-28 to fund additional large sites to accommodate asylum seekers'
A treasonous decision.
Every penny of that should be directed towards a programme of mass deportations.
P.R.I.A retweeted
This raises two important points:
1/ Sexual assaults committed by strangers, especially those carried out in groups or in public, are overwhelmingly perpetrated by African and Muslim migrants.
2/ Sexual assaults committed by people known to the victims are likely to be heavily underreported in ethnic enclaves.
For example, in an article about the wives of grooming gang perpetrators, one spoke of how her 12-year-old neighbour had been raped and impregnated by the girl’s uncle. The girl was blamed and sent to Pakistan.
This is not just an issue among Muslim enclaves. While Hindus and Sikhs are considered comparatively assimilated, these groups still have arranged/forced marriages and often reside in insular communities.
The Sikh Women’s Aid report claims that 1 in 3 Sikh women suffer sexual abuse in the UK, and that 1 in 4 are sexually abused during childhood.
This is why these statistics will not tell the whole story, and it is likely far, far worse. Moreover, British women should be put at risk of being violently raped by migrants while walking in public because some other women are sexually assaulted in their homes by people known to them.
Stranger assault should be its own criminal category.
Reminder that this still contains a massive statistical problem by grouping known-offender with stranger-assault.
Only 8% of offences are 'in public', and only 15% (against women) by a stranger, but these will form the vast majority among Afghan, MENA, and SSA offences, meaning the true relative multiple is many times higher than these stats suggest.
Put another way, the British population stats capture a huge number of offences by people known to the victim - which is unlikely for the above groups where reporting by victims within family circles is even more discouraged by cultural norms and language barriers, and many will be single males without 'known' female circles.
So the apples to apples comparison would suggest rates are something on the order of 6.5x worse than appears on these charts, even factoring the adjustment for age and gender.
P.R.I.A retweeted
Fahnbulleh is the daughter of a former Liberian Cabinet Minister. When Liberia descended into civil war her family fled to Sierra Leone and for some reason the British government granted them asylum.
At university she studied African economic development and now advocates for millions of migrants to be given ILR at a potential cost of hundreds of billions to British taxpayers.
She epitomises why immigrants should not be allowed to become politicians. She clearly feels no duty to the British people. On the contrary, she seems to see us as cash cows for the benefit of other migrants.
P.R.I.A retweeted
Our ancestors, 336 years ago, wrote into the English Bill of Rights:
"No foreign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentate hath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm."
They were right.
P.R.I.A retweeted
We will not have our history and entire existence erased because cowardly politicians don’t have the courage to state the truth.
We are a people, and England is our home.
Restore Britain will defend it.
Farage apparently thinks the question of Englishness is an “academic debate”, in his words, that is not worth engaging in - a simply extraordinary thing to say.
We are witnessing profound demographic change across Britain, and the leader of Reform thinks the meaning of English identity is a subject to be brushed aside because he’s scared of being called a few unpleasant names.
Englishness is NOT an academic debate.
The English are a historic people. We have our own ancestry, heritage, culture, traditions and national identity.
Incredibly, Farage disagrees with that.
My view, and Restore Britain's view, is clear.
We are not simply a collection of passport holders living within a geographical boundary.
And acknowledging the existence of the historic English people does not mean denying that others can develop a genuine attachment and belonging to our nation, but that does not make them ethnically English.
A government can print a passport, sadly we all know that - it CANNOT falsely manufacture centuries of history or ancestral roots.
The historic English people have a home - it’s called England, and we have nowhere else to go.
And yes, in that home, the English are being demographically replaced. That’s just a fact. It’s happening all over Britain, it’s happened all over Britain. Go to East London, Rochdale, Luton, Birmingham, Blackburn, Bradford. I could go on.
This is NOT an academic debate.
This is our home, or at least it was.
Farage is simply not the man to save it.
You cannot claim to defend a nation when you refuse to even acknowledge its historic people because you might get your feelings hurt.
The hour is simply too late for that pathetic level of gutlessness.
The English are not an academic abstract afterthought.
We will not have our history and entire existence erased because cowardly politicians don’t have the courage to state the truth.
We are a people, and England is our home.
Restore Britain will defend it.
P.R.I.A retweeted
Farage is the heir to Blair. I can’t think of a single fundamental area of principle they differ on. If anything Blair goes further than Farage on certain taboo topics.
I don’t know how Reform supporters can continue to defend his indifference on demographics and identity.
Restore knows what an Englishman and a Briton is and those are the people we seek to represent. We won’t engage in pandering to our replacements.
P.R.I.A retweeted
Your CRINK "global struggle" framing does not work when Israel hasn't imposed sanctions on Russia and is being positioned as a significant node in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
This “analysis” by Charlie reveals quite how high his time-preference is and how shallow his understanding of geopolitics is.
The conflict with Iran is part of a global struggle with “CRINK” (China Russia Iran North Korea) which our adversaries have chosen whether we will it or not. They are conducting grey warfare against us including terrorism operations, funding and directing Turkish-controlled people smuggling networks and conducting penetration operations against our political, financial and commercial sectors.
Iran is the “hub” of CRINK.
There exists, in this moment, an opportunity to finally end the Iranian regime. The financial strangulation strategy the US has been conducting since the spring is beginning to bite, with Iranian troops going unpaid, and the (functionally IRGC-run) regime now vulnerable. Such an opportunity has not arisen since 1979, and if we squander it, it would be a grave strategic error.
The idea that we should let Iran’s regime endure because the cost is temporarily higher energy prices is deeply unserious.
