Will Hazell (@whazell) header
Will Hazell (@whazell) profile picture

Chief Political Correspondent @theipaper formerly @telegraph @tes @hsjnews. Story? [email protected]

London
Joined March 2011
Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)Photo by Will Hazell (@whazell)
Great new newsletter, and fascinating data. Gap between minimum wage and median is an interesting & ambiguous one though: obviously lots of people now arguing this has become so compressed in UK it’s negative for growth, making Neets figures worse etc
✍️ I'm starting a newsletter! In the first weekly issue of Trendline, launching this afternoon, I compare life in Britain with life in the US. The UK is often compared with Mississippi, America's poorest state. I argue that we're much more like New York instead. You can sign up for free here: thetimes.com/newsletter/sign…
1
241
Year-to-date GDP growth puts the UK out there with the US, and well ahead of the G7 pack.
Strongest combination of UK GDP/GDP per capita growth (+0.7% QoQ in Q3 26) since Q1 2022 - which itself was massaged by the post-pandemic rebound. A decent argument to be made that this is the strongest period of economic growth this decade. Whilst construction and housing are firmly in recession territory, this is a UK economy that has been growing strongly throughout 2026.
31
80
37
544
83,614
Is now the cheapest time in the next couple of years to buy an EV? (ZEV mandate changes reducing discounts, potential hikes to tariffs on Chinese EVs etc) I took a look for @theipaper here inews.co.uk/news/politics/th…
1
529
Will Hazell retweeted
A moment to note something. This - and the work on Brand- can’t be replaced by AI, however sophisticated. It can’t be replaced by content creators It takes teamwork, painstaking quiet work over long period, and the conviction to take on the legal risk. theguardian.com/tv-and-radio…
9
209
9
1,115
106,696
Lib Dems campaigning for a bank holiday on the anniversary of Athelstan's crowning is such a Lib Dem thing to do
381
New details of Anthropic's IPO provide more evidence of the money merry-go-round that is the fast imploding AI bubble.
2
13
18
2,257
NEW from @Ed_Miliband spokesperson on Russell Brand's conviction. Comes amid renewed questions about Miliband and Labour's decision to court Brand during the 2015 general election campaign.
14
15
3
25
13,180
Our @theipaper big read on how that Miliband/Brand meeting came about in 2015- and how some around the then Labour leader thought they’d pulled off a general election winning coup. Link in tweet below👇
1
427
Will Hazell retweeted
This will be studied in journalism schools.
This piece to camera went so far off the rails so quickly. Filming in Niddrie on bonfire night… cameo by Police Scotland’s finest.
10
84
2,421
218,836
Will Hazell retweeted
This makes up for not getting to the final
Effigy of Fifa boss Gianni Infantino in an Argentina kit brutally booed at Lewes Bonfire celebrations 😬
There's a new version of this post
3
3
17
2,222
Will Hazell retweeted
This 600-word screed can basically be boiled down to seven: "Don't blame me 2028 Republican primary voters." Vance joins in the voter rebuke of Trump. I'm struggling to recall a VP breaking so spectacularly with his boss.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
17
42
4
207
7,245
Think these results are interesting. Strong majorities in support among Lab, Lib Dem & Green voters particularly striking. In that light, apology for slave trade fits into overarching Burnham strategy of consolidating progressive vote (see also Israel settlement sanctions + EU).
52% of Britons would support the UK officially apologising for Britain's role in the transatlantic slave trade - but only 21% support paying reparations to countries that were affected
259
Will Hazell retweeted
As Lady Bracknell might say: To lose the loyalty of one VP, Mr. President, may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness
2
7
1
97
6,185
The VP talking like a pundit about Republicans losing because of the war started by his administration. "If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so." This looks like conscious uncoupling to me.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
1
275
Lib Dems really revelling in the midterm results. @Bobby_Dean just said Trump “took one hell of a beating”. #PMQs
1
2
6
863
Strong language from Haigh on Iran war in wake of midterm results. Doesn’t criticise Trump directly, but says Iran war has been “catastrophic for the cost of living crisis here at home”.
1
469
At #PMQs where Lou Haigh is deputising for PM, Haigh says that the Government “has been clear the benefit bill will come down”. Sadly they’ve been anything but. Haven’t set out when it will come down, whether it will come down in absolute terms, or just against forecast etc.
3
7
1
26
2,059
Tory deputy leader @alexburghart: “If Labour doesn’t want to do the right thing, why doesn’t it just get out of the way?” Not convinced the Tories are really desperate for an election given where the polls are…
2
246