Pinned Tweet
Liverpool’s much-needed evolution: Klopp’s 3-2-2-3.
Having played four games in a new system, the Reds look revitalized. But what exactly has changed and how has it made Liverpool better? And what can still be improved?
Tactical Analysis Thread!
Isak has been truly poor since coming to Liverpool. A decline in athleticism and shocking in terms of movement and his ability to hold the ball up and make it stick.
Funnily enough, Salah is elite at the latter two and would have been a good fit in this system off the right.
Leaving Salah on the bench two out of three games is terrible squad management. He hasn’t been good this season but tactics around him have been flawed & he’s still LFC’s most proven forward + talisman.
Salah’s interview was selfish but likely avoidable with better management.
Liverpool’s current tendency to sit back when they get the lead is concerning. Not sure if it’s Slot’s instruction or psychological but it’s not what this squad is built for & it must stop.
Questioning the decision to continuously play Gakpo over Salah in this four-midfielder line-up. Playing Salah on the right with one of Wirtz or Szoboszlai on the left feels a much better tactical fit, and would allow Kerkez to excel. Salah also a higher output ceiling than Gakpo.
Really good performance from Liverpool, especially off the ball.
Good adjustments from Slot, I like that he used Gakpo as the 9 when Ekitike went off, rather than using Wirtz as the focal point like he has previously.
The midfield and full backs were excellent, Salah lively.
Liverpool with a more aggressive pressing scheme & Szoboszlai in the spine have looked miles better vs Villa & now Madrid.
They need to avoid becoming too vertical, as that game state will favour Madrid. Retain possession and pin Real back, chances will come. Jones on, if fit.
Liverpool should’ve placed a greater emphasis on improving their build-up over the summer, but they’re fine.
Building around a midfield core of Szoboszlai, Gravenberch, Jones and Wirtz will help, and they will improve up front as they build chemistry.
There’s definitely a lot of truth to this. PSG exploited this to perfection on route to winning the CL last season.
One of the biggest reasons is that midfielders are often man-to-man and less likely to be left with space, whereas full backs can more easily escape from wingers.
He should be starting most games, or at the very least be ahead of Mac Allister in the pecking order.
Five-man rotation in midfield and RB consisting of Szoboszlai, Wirtz, Gravenberch, Jones, and Bradley (Frimpong in certain game states, when fit).
Mac Allister needs dropping.
This scenario is also a byproduct of Slot often being unwilling to commit a full back to the press and go man-to-man —
which, in my opinion, Liverpool absolutely should do.
They’re not gaining nearly enough out of possession at the moment. Too passive.
One underrated aspect of Arsenal’s many full back signings is all of them are comfortable on the ball & dynamic and therefore provide a strong base to build up.
This is an area where some of Liverpool’s defenders really struggle & it’s one of the reasons for LFC’s bad run.
These actions were very promising. Wirtz showed a greater creative zone of influence with those through balls and the long cross, something which Liverpool lack with Trent gone. Wirtz will need to be a key creative force & I think he can be that with time.
I’m more concerned about Frimpong and Kerkez as signings than Wirtz, who I think will come good.
Neither are simple tactical fits in this Liverpool team at full back, and both feel like square pegs in round holes.
Frequent rotations and more off-the-cuff and spontaneous movements & interplay are the evolution of a team. These are things you rely on more when the team is well-drilled & the players know each other.
But this first needs a reliable base. It’s up to Slot to provide this base.






