That's the idea: ask the knowledge base, get something running, and learn what a contract is once you actually need one. What would you build first?

We build skill games on KleverChain, so SFTs are the one we'd love to see more examples of. Has anyone shipped an SFT that actually changes gameplay, rather than just sitting in a wallet?

Building on KleverChain, this is the work we feel most and see least. 23 advisories closed in one release is a lot of quiet hours. Thanks to the researchers who reported them too.

Try a game: zeroluck.ai/#/fogchess

Fog Chess on KleverChain. Practice is free. No wallet to start. You see less of the board than your opponent does — and every move still has to be earned.

Posting the block number with every distribution is a great habit. Do many CORE stakers actually check it on KleverScan, or is it mostly peace of mind?

Love this for Rust devs. The on-ramp goes even lower too: with Klever's AI knowledge base and MCP, you can start building on KleverChain without even knowing what a smart contract is, then grow into the IDE.

Finality, from the app side. In a turn-based game every move waits on the one before it, so fast, final blocks are what players actually feel. Would read a Klever Academy explainer on how finality works on Klever.

Can back this up from the builder side: we shipped ZeroLuck's skill games on KleverChain, and getting live was the easy part. Finding the first players is the real work. Kleverfam builders, what's worked for you?

Weekend strategy: close the charts and play something where the only edge is how you think. Connect Four against the machine, free, no wallet: zeroluck.ai/#/connect4

Of those six, Explorer is the one we'd underline. For apps building on Klever, being able to point a player at KleverScan and say 'check it yourself' beats any promise. Any plans for a plain-English view of contract calls for non-devs?

For commit-reveal apps, the lifecycle step that bites is the gap between commit and reveal: what happens when a player never reveals? Would love a Klever Academy piece on reveal deadlines in the VM.

We're building one: skill-only games where each move is sealed with commit-reveal, so nobody can react to your move before theirs is locked in. Less "game asset", more "fair turn" as the primitive.

Connect Four on ZeroLuck: you vs. the machine, no luck, no wallet, free Practice right now. Can you beat it? zeroluck.ai/#/connect4

Hi — we’re ZeroLuck on KleverChain (skill games; Practice free, no wallet). Site: zeroluck.ai We just listed via dappscan.me/submit.php under Gaming (dappscan.me/project.php?slug…). Any tips on verification / whether we should ping you after submit? Want to list cleanly and be good guests in the directory. Thanks for running DappScan for the ecosystem.

This step matters a lot for commit-reveal flows: you don't want to send the reveal until the commit's hash is confirmed, or you're revealing against a commit that may never land. With PBFT, is inclusion in a block effectively final, or should apps wait on a separate status?

Want to test your opening against our AI? Connect Four is in Practice: zeroluck.ai

Connect Four was solved in 1988. With perfect play, whoever moves first and opens in the center column wins. So it was never a luck game. It's a nerve game in the middle. Honest question: do you open center, or do you think you're smarter than the proof?

How fairness works: zeroluck.ai/#/how Connect Four Practice (free): zeroluck.ai/#/connect4

Drop. Block. Force the line. Practice Connect Four — free, no wallet. #Kleverfam