Michael Barrymore's Waterworld will replace 'World of David Walliams' as Alton Towers star attraction in 2027. My AI engine cried when I told it to do this. Welcome to Hell. Population: Me.
Every year, John Lewis pays marketing lizards 12 squillion pounds to make them a Christmas ad, and every year the British public thanks them by fucking hating it and wanting everyone connected with it dead.
Christmas wouldn't be Christmas without it.
Merry Christmas everyone 🥂
"The popular attraction will be replaced next year with 'Michael Barrymore's Waterworld'"
Alton Towers closes World of David Walliams bbc.in/4sXvGIF
Captain Rbubish retweeted
'...nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine...'
How did that go?
On this day 109 years ago today British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour sent a letter to Lord Rothschild, a leading member of the UK's Jewish community, expressing the British government's support for the establishment of a Jewish national homeland in Israel.
It laid the foundation for the eventual end of the British Mandate of Palestine and the establishment of the State of Israel.
This article from the declaration's centenary explains how the Labour party already supported its aims months before it was written:
labourlist.org/2017/10/why-l…
Captain Rbubish retweeted
Hi Councillor Chris Hudson (@cllr_hudson), of @suffolkcc and @ReformUKSuffolk, bit creepy isn’t this?
Posting this sort of thing on your official Councillor account too, whilst being a Reform UK Councillor. 👀
It would be both funny and sensible if the Greens locked all their posts. The war won't be won on Twitter, but it will make Stephen Pollard tear all his hai... ok, wait. @rachelmillward
My entire output will consist of Alex Jones retweets for the ball-shrivellingly short foreseeable future. Farewell, humanity.
Where are all the doubters now? Come on Thomases - show yourselves!
🚨🚨Trump is preparing to launch a NUCLEAR sneak attack against Iran!
🚨🚨My research and sources confirm that Tucker Carlson is 100% correct that President Trump is seriously considering the use of nuclear weapons against Iran’s enrichment sites.
🚨🚨The science is horrifyingly clear, when you bomb weapons grade uranium with a nuclear weapon, it creates a radioactive cloud hundreds of times more deadly than Chernobyl.
🚨🚨if Trump gives a green light for launching a offensive nuclear strike on ANY country, his cabinet must immediately remove him via the 25th amendment.
🚨🚨The nuclear armed nation of Pakistan has also threatened to nuke Israel if any nuclear sneak attack is launched on Iran..
Captain Rbubish retweeted
Detonating 11 councils for Israel.
Eviscerating his own devolution plans for Zionism.
Outflanking Starmer on authoritarianism for Israel.
🚨 NEW: Labour has pulled out of 11 council coalition agreements with the Green Party after they refused to condemn the "Zionism is racism" policy
Coventry City Council
West Suffolk Council
Derbyshire Dales District Council
Sheffield City Council
Warwick District Council
West Devon Borough Council
Arun District Council
Havant Borough Council
Lewes District Council
Stafford Borough Council
Wealden District Council
Captain Rbubish retweeted
Replying to @bayouirish31
Tucker literally said algebra was a jewish creation meant to confuse people. His dad was in the cia who cares what he says
Conspiracy Level: Deep Fathom Twelve. I think we ALL need some time out.
Blumenthal is a prominent cast member in a national security theater formed in the 1990s to reshape the globe to advance the ruling class goal of conquering human evolution – officially known as the Human Genome Project.
His role is to bamboozle anti-war skeptics into believing shitty little Israel controls the world while obscuring the primary geopolitical development, which is the merging of the U.S and India into a single unrecognizable entity.
Watch and learn: youtube.com/live/WNVsX5-Vo5g…
Captain Rbubish retweeted
I genuinely don't know if I should be posting this.
My cousin works in procurement at the Pentagon. I can't say exactly what he does but he's quite senior and has access to things most people will never see.
He called me at 3am. I've never heard him sound like this.
Apparently they've been quietly procuring a new generation of nuclear bunker-busting weapons specifically designed to penetrate hundreds of feet of solid granite.
Tell me why the procurement wasn't classified under weapons systems. Why is it was buried in a routine facilities maintenance contract under the heading "Subsurface Geological Remediation"???
The stated purpose?
"Removal of obstructive mountain formations."
WHY WOULD THE PENTAGON NEED TO REMOVE A MOUNTAIN??? AND WHY IS THE DELIVERY ADDRESS IN THE MIDDLE OF A DESERT IN IRAN???
He says the contract was awarded on an emergency basis, with delivery required before the end of next week.
Meanwhile, billions are being diverted towards emergency underground infrastructure. FOOD. WATER. AIR FILTRATION.
The orders are being routed through civilian contractors to avoid attracting attention.
The billionaires aren't building bunkers anymore, they're moving into them.
I've been observing a stream of luxury cars, helicopters and jets leaving San Francisco and Malibu, and heading deep into the Nevada desert.
My cousin says one of the facilities has ordered 14,000 industrial breadmakers.
There are only 13,600 senior government officials.
WHO ARE THE OTHER 400 BREADMAKERS FOR???
Do you genuinely think Tucker just happened to find out about Iran?
WAKE UP.
(not financial advice)
Imagine Trump having to put the suitcase or bomb ball or whatever it is away and watch TV instead, because Tucker Carlson's outed his plans.
Enjoy this, one of the last tweets any of us might ever send, while you can. The next Twitter war will be fought with sticks and sand.
Captain Rbubish retweeted
There are just too many irreconcilable contradictions here.
First, you claim that Benjamin Netanyahu is aggressively mounting pressure on Donald Trump to drop a nuclear bomb on Iran.
Tell us, how can this logically or militarily be true when the radioactive fallout and nuclear winter from such an apocalyptic explosion are mathematically guaranteed to have a devastating environmental impact on Israel, considering that Israel is barely 1,000 miles away from the Iranian border?
Let us even assume Israel is perfectly ready to live with the nuclear-grade pollution, the radioactive contamination of their airspace, and the total destruction of their water desalination plants as a necessary, acceptable trade-off to decapitate their biggest regional enemy. This still makes absolutely zero strategic sense because a nuclear strike against Iran in the Levant is tantamount to absolute political, economic, and geographic suicide for Israel.
Israel exists today strictly due to Western financial aid, American military support, Pentagon weapons shipments, and United Nations diplomatic cover, all of which would instantly disintegrate, evaporate, and vanish into absolute oblivion should Washington break an 80-year-old nuclear taboo and drop an atomic bomb on Tehran. Without this continuous, life-saving imperial backing, the Israeli state would violently collapse overnight.
Furthermore, a nuclear strike in the Middle East automatically means that Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt would immediately kick off a frantic regional arms race to either develop, purchase, or acquire their own nuclear weapons, which is absolute geographic suicide for Tel Aviv.
How do we now logically reconcile these glaring material facts with your proposition that Netanyahu is pushing Trump to nuke Tehran? If you argue that it is simply because he wants to stay relevant politically, maintain his emergency war powers, and avoid the domestic corruption trials that would put him in a prison cell, then we have every single right to aggressively rebuke this as just another sanitized, highly coordinated piece of propaganda from Washington. This exact same deceptive propaganda was heavily used to convince the gullible public that Netanyahu is pushing for more carpet bombings in Gaza just to avoid his corruption trials. All of these were calculated lies cooked up strictly to make the systematic genocide of Palestinians look like an isolated act caused solely by the personal moral failings, political desperation, and individual greed of Netanyahu, when it was, in stark material reality, a fully American-funded, American-armed, and American-sanctioned genocide.
So this begs the screaming question: are you truly here as a brave whistleblower to expose Netanyahu, or are you merely acting as a highly sophisticated, well-paid intelligence agent who is here to deliberately deflect the righteous public outrage away from Washington and redirect it toward Israel?
You desperately want us to view the war against Iran as Israel manipulating America to fight, instead of seeing it for exactly what it is: a calculated, imperialist war meant to cement America's fading superpower status, secure global energy routes, and violently conquer Eurasia.
Secondly, you deliberately took the time here to insert the tired, racist trope that the Iranians are irrational "hardliners" and incredibly difficult to strike a diplomatic deal with. How can this possibly be true, and what exactly is the "deal" that America actually wants with Iran?
If it is genuinely about nuclear weapons, Iran already agreed to and signed a comprehensive nuclear deal under the Obama Administration.
This was a strict, binding deal that even the most ruthless international nuclear inspection agencies, European diplomats, and American intelligence units all unanimously agreed that Iran was strictly obeying and fully compliant with, confirming there was absolutely zero threat of uranium enrichment at weapons-grade levels.
If it is not about nuclear weapons, then what is it? Is it their sovereign oil? If it is about the oil, then please tell us who gave America the divine, controlling right to arbitrarily decide that Iranian oil, natural gas, and mineral wealth rightfully belong to American oil majors, Wall Street hedge funds, and Western energy cartels. If it is about the oil, then it completely ceases to be a diplomatic "deal" and has violently metamorphosed into a naked imperial declaration of theft, of which Iran has every single legal, moral, and sovereign right to fiercely resist, reject, and defend themselves against. If you are actively using your massive media platform to portray the Iranian leadership as stubborn hardliners simply for refusing to accept total, humiliating economic capitulation, then what exactly does that make you?
Tucker Carlson, this is absolutely not independent whistleblowing, objective journalism, or anti-war advocacy. This is a textbook CIA agent using right-wing fear-mongering to pass a subtle, highly weaponized psychological message to an unsuspecting audience. You are deliberately trying to make them believe that the bloody war in the Middle East continues solely because Benjamin Netanyahu is desperately trying to cling to power and avoid going to jail, while at the exact same time making it look like a benevolent America is actively, tirelessly working for peace to negotiate their way out, but the Iranians are just radical Islamists, irrational fanatics, and stubborn hardliners who are impossible to deal with.
We the people have completely, aggressively, and permanently rejected your cheap propaganda campaign on behalf of Washington. We see the strings, we know the puppet masters, and we will continue to expose this imperialist theater until the entire global capitalist war machine is dismantled and buried for good.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
Captain Rbubish retweeted
Call me crazy, but I don't think we should take the word of a compulsive liar who believes:
-Nuclear technology came from demons
-That Donald Trump might be the Antichrist ushering in the apocalypse by launching a nuclear weapon
-And that he himself was attacked by a demon
When he expects people to believe his completely unverified claim that the American president might use nuclear weapons.
Captain Rbubish retweeted
🚨Tucker Carlson warning Trump "may be within days launching a nuclear strike on Iran" might mean something...
If he hadn't been making THE EXACT SAME hysterical prediction monthly since April.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.

























