angie chesser

**Medical Tuesday.** I lied to my employer about taking the COVID vaccine. I would do it again. I sleep well at night. Here is why. During COVID my company sent me to Atlanta for a workshop with the CDC 2 day event. Hundreds of people were there. They were not interested in wearing masks either. Literally no one I spoke with from the CDC was taking the vaccine or would admit to it. They explained the normal development timeline: just to enter the phases takes years and most fail, then it takes years just to reach the later phases, most candidates fail each phase, and only a tiny fraction of a fraction ever make it through. They specifically said to me many of these tests result in renal issues, myocarditis, nervous system issues, vision loss, the list went on and on of what they had observed and the NDA the test subjects sign keep it from ever becoming public. Some of this testing is done overseas, as well. The COVID shot, with its novel design, had not gone through the decade-plus of testing that rigorous vaccine development usually requires. Some vaccines are studied through autopsy data to understand real-world impact. That work was not done. With that knowledge, many of them refused it. Fauci said he didn't know how many at the CDC had taken the vaccine... how is it every employer had to generate a number of employees vaccinated but the CDC who collected that information didn't have it for themselves? The CDC itself was waived from the requirement. The reason given was simple: they could not risk it becoming public that their own people were refusing the vaccine. That was communicated openly. They told me this. When my company later said “take the vaccine or separate,” I indicated I had taken it. Many revisionists are stating that was never communicated to get vaccinated or fired ... No, that is exactly what happened. My boss asked for a pdf of the card to be submitted to the company portal. With twenty thousand employees and no real verification system at the time, a basic sample pdf worked- no name no dates. If they had pushed harder I would have faked a card. I doubt they did an audit. Here is the ethical question I asked myself: Is it okay to lie to the person demanding you take a product that could kill you or shorten your life that had not completed normal long-term testing, did not stop transmission the way it was sold, and still carried known risks? When an institution ignores contrary information, removes choice, and threatens livelihoods, ethics have already left the room. Only one side in that exchange should feel guilt. I do not. I did not feel it was my duty to refuse and quit to be replaced by a sheep that would be awarded for their willingness to follow a state's unconstitutional mandate. Many did... sure you quit and gave up your job and stood by your morals. I continued to put food on my family's table and draw a check and felt no remorse for lying to the people who could have potentially been sentencing me to death. My family did not take it. An immunologist we knew described the disease as comparable to a bad flu season for most people and said natural immunity was preferable to an unproven shot. They said they were on notice that they would end their career by speaking up... and we then witnessed exactly that happening. I consider myself ethical. I do the right thing when no one is watching because I believe the Lord is watching. At no point did I feel that refusing this particular product or hiding my rejection of it violated that standard. The very fact that congress was waived from the requirement was another red flag. The people setting the mandates were not all taking the same risk they demanded of everyone else. That fact mattered then. It still matters now. Bookmark if this matches what you saw. Quote or repost your observation. Comment below.