bruh my muse found this unlisted future episode of this podcast i follow 😭 feels a little unsettling but i'm also really excited to watch it before the rest of the world. video has 17 views right now lol. this is a big podcast. i don't wanna name it or share the link out of respect.
cool idea. i believe the future is some version of this. agent civilization with a bunch of small specialized agents. like how human civilization works. not all of us know how to make jeans or build computers but we all have jeans and computers.
Introducing Kardashev-0.7, the world’s first trained swarm made of 32 distinct models
Trained with RL for Population Scaling (RLPS), 32 models organically develop specialization & complementary capabilities, delivering frontier performance at:
- 0.007x ~ 0.02x of the inference cost
- 0.03x of the required memory
Civilization advances through different minds specializing and working together. We’re bringing that principle into AI
@BanburyRoadAI, we’re scaling intelligence by model count, toward civilizations of models that learn to build on one another
i feel like OpenAI employees are trying to make Dots sound way more useful than they actually are tho...
acl retweeted
I think there is much more potential energy in Sign In With ChatGPT/Plugin Extensions than we realize
if you wanna get a feel for how the new usage limit on $200 plan is gonna be, use it on fast mode because the usage is being cut in half and fast mode takes twice the usage
acl retweeted
Can't invest in Anthropic at 2 trillion because it could be a 0 and I'm fucked, or it could be 20 trillion, but at 20 trillion we are all fucked.
acl retweeted
🚨 OpenAI $200 plan now includes 2x less usage
After Opus 5.5 beat Astra and Sonnet 5.5 beat Sol, OpenAI looks like it’s hammering the third nail into its own coffin.
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
acl retweeted
How did anthropic go from SO far behind to SO far ahead in one week
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo