Pinned Tweet
Replying to @ampedspring
Another one: JD takes over before 2028, possibly even before 2027.
4
1
179
e retweeted
“The lesson of 2026 is we have agency. We can fight back against authoritarianism.
Another lesson is America is not immune to fascism.
It was the [alarmist] ‘hand-wringers’ who [have now] made the world safe for the effete, both-sides elites.”
open.substack.com/pub/thebul…
e retweeted
An interesting thing in this essay by former JSOC chief Admiral William McRaven is his admission that the U.S. does not have the moral high ground in the war with Iran: foreignaffairs.com/united-st…
e retweeted
I visit the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier several times a year. I’ve seen this happen multiple times.
Absolute fucking embarrassment that it had to happen to SecDef.
e retweeted
❗White House's William Scharf letter to new Congressional majority threatens lawmakers with criminal prosecution.⬇
Legally repulsive, ignores Constitution (Speech or Debate Clause), may trigger law on "corruptly" by "threatening letter or communication" obstructing Congress.

ALT "Beyond being inconsistent with the clear, well-recognized constitutional limitations on your investigative functions, threats to executive branch officials designed to deter them from public service, or process designed merely to abuse or instill fear in the recipient may cross the line into blatant criminality. And issuing unlawful subpoenas with the intention of depriving citizens of their constitutional rights and privileges may warrant further investigation."
e retweeted
I completely agree with this. I'm deeply skeptical of the other Articles, and Articles 7 and 8 (related to the arrest of Maduro and the war in Yemen) in particular seem to be actively pernicious, but I would very easily vote for this particular article of impeachment related to the suppression of free speech. So let's focus on this one:
e retweeted
More distillation by Chinese models
Breaking news from @ianmking: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admits to extramarital affair and the company board is now investigating him being targeted by a Chinese espionage plot. He remains CEO for now. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
‘Little Rascals’ star resorts to GoFundMe ahead of having 6th child: ‘I really need some help’ trib.al/2qGNkTK
51
e retweeted
You will note that CENTCOM's map of Iran's borders does not label the countries on those borders.
Iran has about 3,600 miles of land border and 1,500 miles of sea border. 1,100 miles of the sea border is along the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman. Around 400 is on the Caspian Sea.
Of the 3,600 miles of land border, around 1,000 is shared with Iraq, another 500-600 is shared with Afghanistan, 500-600 is shared with Pakistan, 700 is shared with Turkmenistan.
Turkmenistan is notoriously neutral and will certainly not assist the United States. The Taliban runs Afghanistan so good luck with that. The Iraqi government may help us, but the pro-Iranian presence in Iraq will all but guarantee little is done and the Kurds aren't going to be in a hurry to support the US again. Pakistan will not be in a hurry to help us either because whenever the US tires of this conflict, Pakistan has to live next to Iran.
Task Force Iron Gate is worthless. Like everything this administration has done to date, it is intended to sound like something is being accomplished without actually doing anything. It is a waste of time, a waste of resources, and a waste of any good will this nation has built up in the region over the last 25 years (not that much remained to begin with).
e retweeted
The WH waged a dayslong campaign to discredit CNN reporting last year that Midnight Hammer hadn’t obliterated Iran’s nuclear program and only temporarily set it back (deadline.com/2025/06/trump-c…)
16 months later:
Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $20 million and possible relocation for information about Iran’s nuclear program, including its facilities, equipment, and associated personnel, such as those in the scientific community, or the movement of any of the above.
Submit a tip: rewardsforjustice.net/reward…
We’ve been told for 8 months that an Iranian nuclear threat is imminent.
Is the current form of this war - a predominately naval campaign (blockade and escorts), and CENTCOM soliciting tips on X - a commensurate response to a threat of such gravity?
Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $20 million and possible relocation for information about Iran’s nuclear program, including its facilities, equipment, and associated personnel, such as those in the scientific community, or the movement of any of the above.
Submit a tip: rewardsforjustice.net/reward…
1
75
e retweeted
This is the giant elephant in the room for Republican politicians. Voters, including many Republicans, saw brazen corruption in Trump admin and allies as a big issue. But GOP pols still afraid to directly challenge this corruption. Curious who will be the first to really step up.
Wild prediction time: Putin detonates a tactical nuke in one of these cities then formally ends the war.
Fairly certain Trump doesn’t roll the dice with SCOTUS re: self pardons and has to rely on JD. Whether Vance follows through or ends up serving him up on a platter…
Replying to @JHWeissmann
Not sure how president pardoning himself will stand up to legal challenges, if that’s a big factor I think JD tries to force Trump to resign in exchange for a pardon. He gets to be prez and attempt to right the ship for two years.
9
e retweeted
If a MAGA voter is bewildered today, perhaps he should stop making a meme calling his opponents “fake and gay,” delete the post declaring that Indian Americans worship demons, turn off the podcast that’s shrieking at him that every person who votes Democratic is a heretic, and take a very long and thoughtful look in the mirror.
Donald Trump is to blame, but no one — absolutely no one — made you imitate him. nytimes.com/2026/11/05/opini…
e retweeted
An opinion divorced from reality and the T10 responsibilities of the SECDEF. Broadly speaking the Secretary advises POTUS and publishes / implements the NDS and defense planning guidance that align with POTUS’ strategic objectives. This includes guidance for employment of the force and budgeting through the PPBE process.
Further, SECDEF is in the operational chain of command and has T10 authority to carry out military operations directed by the president through the combatant commanders. He clearly is not the only one responsible for achieving POTUS’ stated objectives but touting the department’s tactical and operational success while saying its leader has no responsibility in translating these actions into strategic success is inaccurate.
The secretary clearly understands this. After all, he gave himself the Secretary of War label.
Replying to @DataRepublican
You know perfectly well that the military is subordinate to civilian control.
Hegseth destroyed Iran’s military and did so magnificently.
Hegseth is not in any reason, shape, or form responsible for carrying out Iran in the first place.
e retweeted
This is a total hoot.
About the only thing it gets correct is that 2024 Trump voters were "pissed." As the polls spell out, very clearly, they were angry about tariffs--a word weirdly not found in this post, but which exit polls showed 65% of voters dislike. There's a straight line between those punishing costs and Senate losses in Kansas, Iowa, Ohio (farm areas) and beyond.
Angry the WH instead spent this past year talking about ballrooms and the Kennedy center. Frustrated by the complete absence of a next-two-year agenda (85% are concerned by healthcare costs. Where is the GOP plan?)
They are also unhappy about the war, though the numbers might be different if the president been clear about an exit strategy. And not sure where the "smartest" (and most anonymous) pollster in the world got the Israel argument. Exit polls show that of the 51% of voters who said our support for Israel was "too strong," only 19% of even that subset of respondents were Republican. The vast majority of GOP voters said our support for Israel was "just right" or "not strong enough."
Amusing to claim the problem here was traditional conservatives, as they were sidelined. Tillis was run out of the party, dooming NC. As was Cornyn. The WH had a pure expression of its second-term Trump/Vance agenda and loyalty in its chosen candidate of Ken Paxton. That would be the smoking carcass sitting on a 12-point loss in. . . Texas of all places. Meanwhile, who exactly is even talking about "asylum"? That's just a smear-y effort to preemptively shut down valid criticism.
The GOP strength has always been in its coalition--free-marketers, defense hawks, cultural conservatives. Trump's first-term success came from largely following that Reagan playbook. The second-term leaned into me-too progressive populism--at the veep's urging--and it ain't working.
The weird thing is that the veep remains more obsessed with remaking the party than with winning. Winning will require a lot better understanding of what happened yesterday than what is on offer in this alternate-universe view.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Don’t worry Mike, you got two years to figure it out. Hopefully you’re better at politics than being faithful.
Actually don’t understand how @TheAKGuy lost the election. Watched the debate and it seemed like a no brainer.
44
This would require him to be somebody else lol
8 THINGS President Trump can do to SALVAGE his presidency:
1. Publicly announce he’s shutting down the 100K subscription to get ‘early access’ to stock market-moving posts & will donate all prior profits to the Red Cross.
2. End the Iran war immediately.
3. Fast-track affordable housing in every major metro area with a high-velocity task force much like Kennedy did to get us to the moon in record time.
4. Televise Town Hall events in various cities along with Democrat leaders discussing the nation’s most pressing issues & seek to build rapport.
5. CEASE all glitzy meetups with top Hedge-fund CEOS & make Main Street his focus & not Wall Street.
6. Work aggressively with Putin to end the Ukraine war.
7. Focus all nationally televised addresses on topics most important to Main Street Americans. They don’t care about lavish ballrooms or reflecting pools.
8. Repeal the tariffs.
3
118





































