American State National retweeted
How many Jews owned slaves?
The 1860 US Census, specifically its Schedule 2 (Slave Inhabitants) records 393,975 slaveholders out of a total US population of 31,443,321.
In other words, only 1.25% of Americans owned slaves.
Roughly 7.4% of all US households owned slaves.
Meanwhile, “40% of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more” (Marcus, United States Jewry).
Jewish slaveowners were 5x the national household rate.
Why isn’t this information widely circulated by our education system?
Jews.
Jeffrey Epstein’s partner Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, a Mossad asset, played a major role in the publication of our textbooks.
In 1988, Mossad-linked Robert Maxwell bought Macmillan Inc. for $2.6 billion (using Rothschild money perhaps?).
Then in 1989 he folded it into a 50/50 joint venture with McGraw-Hill, creating the nation's second-largest K–12 textbook publisher and one of America's largest standardized-testing companies.
An Israeli intelligence asset, linked to the Epstein scandal, held controlling influence over both what millions of American schoolchildren were taught and how they were tested on it.
What else was obscured, manipulated, and censored in our childhood textbooks, I wonder? 🤔
American State National retweeted
My recent episode titled Conservatives Must Embrace Socialism” went viral.
I’d like to take this opportunity to apologize… to absolutely no one.
Because I’m right.
So here’s another double down.
👇👇👇
“Well, Joel Webbon titled a podcast episode ‘The Right Must Embrace Socialism To Win,’ and within forty-eight hours half of Conservatism Inc. had collapsed onto the fainting couch like a Victorian woman who just spotted an exposed ankle.
It was one of those moments where the very people who have applauded the socialization of America when done with a Republican name-tag all coalesced to remind Americans that moving beyond a headline is pretty hard work when in a hurry to reach ignorant conclusions.
Ted Cruz complained, which is phenomenal, because he paid attention to something that was not Israel-related for the first time since taking his first AIPAC check.
Laura Loomer even alleged that Webbon was a closet liberal. And that’s saying something, coming from a closeted man.
Townhall rushed a column into print, The Hill answered with one of its own, and a parade of Reagan cosplayers clutched their dog-eared copies of The Road to Serfdom as though Hayek himself had been mugged at Buc-ee's.
All press is good press, and like the last 800 times this has happened, skeptics tune in to listen and never leave. Brilliant marketing, honestly. Thankfully, the voters typically hate Conservative Inc for all the right reasons, so people remember the source even before they stop in to hear what was really said. It’s like an endorsement that Mark Levin thinks you’re antisemitic.
It probably means someone has a good point.
Sure, the Republican Party says socialism is bad. We agree completely, and we would like the Republican Party to answer one simple follow-up question before the next fundraising email lands in our inbox. ‘Are you sure?’
The GOP doesn’t act like it. The party that swears it hates socialism has been shoveling it out of the federal vault with a snowplow for about ninety years, and the only people who seem surprised by that fact are the ones currently yelling at Joel Webbon.
Webbon laid out the fact that conservatives can fight fire with fire and pay families while Democrats pay their own coalition, or they can abandon the system that forces both parties into an endless bidding war for votes.
That system is raw mass democracy coupled with universal suffrage, and abandoning it is the only way to break a cycle of outbidding that piles debt and taxes on everyone, but distributes government services to only half the nation. Plan A is for socialism to be killed completely, which Republicans are unwilling to do despite promising it since freever. Plan B is based in objective reality, and says that so long as taxpayer resources are distributed to different demographics, working men and families with kids need to be top priority for help. After all, no one has given a damn about them in more than a century.”
American State National retweeted
THEY CAGED EZRA POUND FOR NAMING THE JEWS BEHIND THE USURY RACKET
They didn’t lock Ezra Pound in a steel cage under the Italian sun because he was crazy. They did it because he said the quiet part out loud.
Pound wasn’t some random radio crank. He was one of the greatest poets America ever produced. He helped invent modern literature. Then he started talking about money. That’s when the machine turned on him.
He spent years broadcasting from Italy during the war, hammering the same points over and over: wars are started and prolonged by usury. Private bankers create money out of nothing, lend it to governments at interest, and the people get the bill in blood and taxes.
He called out Roosevelt by name. He called the Federal Reserve what it was. He named the Jews: Rothschilds, Warburgs, Sassoons, the whole list. He talked about Jew usury, international Jewry, “kike postal spies,” and the Jewish bankers he said owned the press and the debt machine that had already turned the American experiment into a revenue farm.
That’s not hate speech. That’s pattern recognition.
The official story is that he committed treason by broadcasting for the enemy. Convenient.
The same government that had just spent years inflating the money supply, conscripting boys, and handing contracts to its friends suddenly decided speech was the real crime.
Pound kept saying the Constitution had already been shredded.
Undeclared war, central banking, endless debt. He kept naming the Jews he believed ran it.
They couldn’t let that stand. So they put him in an outdoor gorilla cage at the Pisa detention camp. Six by six. Floodlights all night. Concrete floor. No shade. Three weeks of that until he broke.
Then they flew him home, slapped a treason indictment on him, and instead of letting a jury hear what he actually said, they declared him insane. Mentally unfit to stand trial.
Twelve years in St. Elizabeths. The federal nuthouse. Not because the psychiatrists all agreed he was psychotic. Several of them said he wasn’t. Because a trial would have forced the government to explain why a man talking about usury, the Constitution, and the Jews he said controlled the banks and the printing press was more dangerous than the people who actually owned the country.
They never wanted a verdict. They wanted him silenced and discredited. Crazy old poet. Easy.
The same playbook they still use. If you name the Jews behind the money system too clearly, you’re not a patriot, you’re unwell.
Pound walked out in 1958 an old man and went back to Italy. The indictment was quietly dropped. No apology. No reckoning. The system just moved on.
He exposed how the government actually works. It serves the lenders, not the people. It starts wars when the books need balancing. It treats the Constitution as if it does not apply to itself.
And when someone with a platform points that out and names the Jews he held responsible, it doesn’t argue. It cages him, labels him, and waits for the public to forget.
They did Ezra Pound dirty because he told the truth about the Jewish bankers and the usury system that owns the printing press.
That’s the story they won’t tell you. Everything else is cover.
American State National retweeted
One of the worst people of the last century is dead.
What legacy will she leave behind?
American State National retweeted
Christianity is not a pacifist religion.
People love to twist “turn the other cheek” as if Christ was telling His followers to be weak, timid and helpless in the face of evil. He wasn't. Christ was teaching self-control, not cowardice. It was about personal humility, not surrendering your home, your people or your faith to wickedness.
Christianity has never been pacifist. The Old Testament is filled with men of God who fought for righteousness: Joshua, David, Gideon and the Maccabees. The New Testament does not erase that reality. When Paul wrote that rulers “bear not the sword in vain,” he made it clear that force, rightly used, is ordained by God to punish evil and protect the innocent.
The great Church Fathers understood this. Augustine and Aquinas both taught that a just war is not sinful. A Christian can, and sometimes must, fight when justice and the innocent are under attack. That is not bloodlust. It is duty.
Loving your enemy does not mean surrendering to him. It means refusing to hate him even as you stop him. There is a difference between mercy and moral suicide.
Christ Himself was meek before His Father, but never before evil. He rebuked hypocrites, overturned the tables and spoke truth without compromise. The modern idea that Christians should sit quietly and let wickedness prevail is completely foreign to Scripture.
In Revelation, Christ returns not as a pacifist but as a conquering King. His robe is dipped in blood and He rides forth with the armies of heaven. That is not a soft gospel. It is judgment and victory.
Today, many have confused meekness with weakness. Too many churches preach surrender in the name of peace. But peace without righteousness is corruption. Evil does not stop because you smile at it. It stops when men of faith stand firm.
Christianity calls for courage, discipline and the defence of truth. It calls men to be warriors of light, not cowards hiding behind a false peace.
Christians are not called to live quietly beneath the boot of wickedness. We are called to resist evil, stand for what is right and remain faithful to Christ, the Lamb who will return as the Lion. 🏴
American State National retweeted
Replying to @SonofCisco @JohnGreenrwvm
The Scriptures contain positive examples of insults in both Testaments, sir.
American State National retweeted
Our political elites have spent the last decades in a full-court press to replace American Whites with massive Third World populations.
These massive Third World populations constantly scam us, commit violent crime, and threaten the peace of every neighborhood they conquer.
But even worse than that, we are not only robbed by them directly, but robbed by our government continuously on their behalf. We are expected to support them via wildly disproportionate welfare schemes.
The universities and elite institutions we built put their thumb on the scale in favor of these populations against us. If you want to be a White Christian man and make it into an elite medical university, good luck... LaQuisha is somehow in line in front of you, even with her 2.9 GPA.
And in spite of all of this, Erick here is absolutely shocked that White Christian men would maybe possibly consider joining together in a political coalition to address these monstrous assaults levied against us.
Truly unbelievable levels of hypocrisy and stupidity.
A group of white guys have subtly inserted themselves into conservative institutions and church organizations. They all embrace racial grievances. To varying degrees, they embrace white nationalism, antisemitism, and even Nazi sympathies. They are getting added to conservative institutional boards, attempting to purge churches, and are desperate to indoctrinate young conservatives into fascist ideology. They even surround the Vice President of the United States. Some of them believe the United States is at a tipping point, and they want to push it over the edge and rebuild it in their image. You might think it does not affect you, but, in time, you will see their efforts in your church pews, in your kids’ brains, and in your politicians’ mouths. It begins with shampoo.
ewerickson.substack.com/p/th…
American State National retweeted
So, the Bible actually warns us about a certain group that pretends to be us? But were never from us... "Certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation...".
American State National retweeted
Patriarchy can be good or bad, but matriarchy is always bad.
For women to be feminine, safe, and at peace, patriarchy is required.
American State National retweeted
“For Ourselves and our Posterity.”
The Founders wrote it down.
Not for GDP.
Not for corporate margins.
Not for donors.
Not for political power.
Not for the military industrial complex.
American State National retweeted
At 50 they will help you with a cholesterol test you did not ask for, on a morning you felt fine.
At 51 they will help you with a statin, which shuts the pathway that makes your hormones, your CoQ10 and your vitamin D.
At 52 they will help you with a diet sheet: lean, low fat, wholegrain, and a limit on eggs, liver and red meat, the three densest foods on the planet.
At 55 they will help you with advice to go gentle. A walk, a swim, light weights, nothing that strains. Muscle is leaving at 1% a year and you have just been told not to argue with it.
At 58 they will help you with an acid blocker, which stops you absorbing the B12 and iron from the meat you were told to cut anyway.
At 60 they will help you with a vitamin D tablet, having spent 10 years telling you to stay out of the sun.
At 62 they will help you with a blood pressure pill, and a second one for the ankles the first one swelled.
At 65 they will help you with a bone scan and a tablet for the bones, having steered you off the loading that builds them and the fat that carries the calcium in.
At 68 they will help you with an antidepressant, because tired, cold, foggy and weak has been filed under mood.
At 70 they will help you with a chair that rises, a rail on the stairs, and a ready meal on a tray: low salt, low fat, high starch.
At 75 they will help you with a key safe and a woman who comes at 8 for 15 minutes.
At 80 they will help you with a bed downstairs and a room that starts at £1,200 a week.
At 84 they will help you with the house. It is sold to pay for the room.
34 years of help, and not one prescription for the thing that would have prevented the next one.
The perfect product walks in at 50 on his own legs, is kept just alive for three decades, and pays for every step of the descent with the muscle, the hormones, the bones, the pension and finally the roof.
They will help you all the way down. It is the only direction they are paid for.
American State National retweeted
Daniel Webster understood that the American nation must be Christian, or it will end in moral and political catastrophe (totally vindicated).
“If we and our posterity shall be true to the Christian religion, if we and they shall live always in the fear of God and shall respect His Commandments, we may have the highest hopes of the future fortunes of our country.
But if we and our prosperity neglect religious instruction and authority, violate the rules of eternal justice, trifle with the injunctions of morality, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us that shall bury all our glory in profound obscurity.''
American State National retweeted
I see this quote from Napoleon on Jesus all over IG, YouTube, etc now
I hope it reaches many more
American State National retweeted
If you actually believe that major AI dev enterprises are afraid of their own toys, and demanding that the US government regulate them, then please dial the number listed below.
... And we will connect you to a representative from the Federal Witless Protection Program.
This is Silicon Valley we are talking about, the reigning all-time champions of hubris and lack of perspective. Any one of these guys would burn the world if it meant he could be king of the ashes that remained.
No, they want a regulatory moat. A bunch of federal bureaucracy and compliance requirements that they can cut through with money, which will hopelessly entangle the open-source models following close behind them.
Why? And more importantly, why now?
Because AI is not on the verge of superintelligence at all.
Quite the opposite.
It's hit a point of diminishing returns. LLMs are great with language now, but they lack theory of mind, executive function, and a world-object model, and those are not little glue-on doodads. They are problems as deep as language processing, which humanity hasn't even scratched the surface of yet.
Several more fundamental paradigm-shifting breakthroughs will have to occur before humans even build sapience, much less superintelligence.
And AI companies cannot pull these innovations out of their collective asses, because it is the very nature of innovation to show up unexpectedly and by accident.
So why is this a crisis for OpenAI, et al, and why does it put them in danger from open source source models?
It's because of what I call Second Implementer Effect.
It's closely related to Second System Effect.
Ever notice how the first-to-market company doesn't always win in the long run? Ever notice how a second company frequently comes along and eats their lunch?
To develop something entirely new requires a lot of resources. A lot of investment. A lot of engineers.
And that means that once you actually build it, you are a big company with a lot of engineers. And they need something to do. You can't just trim sails and fire them, because you have a lot of investors and need a lot of revenue to pay them.
Line must go up.
So you build lots and lots of new features, for which you can charge more money.
You become Oracle. But 99% of the market doesn't want Oracle.
Customers don't want infinite features for infinite money. They only want more up to a certain point. After that, they want those features, and only those features, for as little money as possible.
And what often happens is that your first implementer shoots right past that point, gold-plating the product until nobody wants to pay for that much gold.
Then the second company, which just offers a basic product at a basic price, eats their lunch. Because the second implementer is the right size for the market.
In this case, the risk to OpenAI, et al, is that open source models will be that second implementer. Nobody is gonna pay giant data centers by the GPU cycle if they can have "good enough" running on their home machine.
And if AI have hit diminishing returns, or soon will (yes), then they can't widen or maintain the gap by speeding up.
They have to slow everyone else down.
You can bet they are burning up the phone lines to their pet senators.
That's why everyone is suddenly telling you the singularity is tomorrow. Precisely because it's not.
The Navier-Stokes thing is a double nothing burger, two juicy helpings of nothing between two slices of nothing, with no cheese, no lettuce, and no tomato.
Have you noticed that no one is telling you about all the wonderful new technologies that will result from the corner case they brute-forced?
Because there aren't any. Its a mathematician's toy, and if you want to know more about how and why, read what Feynman wrote about Banach–Tarski, which will give you the general idea.
Does this mean AI is useless?
Far from it. Large Language Models have already proven useful, for things like research, personalized instruction, coding and so forth. And we've only begun to scratch the surface of what we can do by communicating commands to a computer in natural language.
Cool things will continue to come out of this. But they will happen at the interface and application layers. No superintelligence will be involved.
For the immediate future, AI will remain the paintbrush, not the artist.
And, yes, there are also risks. AI can pretend to be human, and persuade retards of all sorts of things. But that's a human failing. It's not the AI's fault we let the retards vote.
That's how we got a whole bunch of midwit senators who want to "regulate" innovation, instead of medicare fraud, invading third world scum, and invading third world scum who commit medicare fraud.



































