JB (@arrotu) header
JB (@arrotu) profile picture

Building @nexart_io and @inficyplatform https://nitter.gq/t.co/p6jzE3QlHR | https://nitter.gq/t.co/66jmt7lccY | https://nitter.gq/t.co/RKWsA6DrDo | https://nitter.gq/t.co/MMt0T0T8og Author https://nitter.gq/t.co/peZlFaWTMz

London, England
Joined July 2014
Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)Photo by JB (@arrotu)
Pinned Tweet
AI approves, pays, decides and ships. Now every action can come with proof. Here's what I've been building 👇 nexart.io nitter.gq/Nexart_io/status/21057…
3
4
806
A model's reasoning trace said it wouldn't call any tools. Then it called one. If that happened in your production agent, what would you show your customer: the trace, or a record of what actually executed?
1
404
This gap is what NexArt is for: tamper-evident, independently verifiable records of what an AI system actually executed, kept separate from what it said it would do. nexart.io
1
33
Every AI governance platform will need verifiable execution evidence. Few should build it. It's signing, timestamps, key handling, and a verifier your customer's auditor can run without you. Is that on your roadmap, or someone else's?
1
1
1
431
We built @Nexart_io for this layer. Evidence Bridge maps the JSON or OpenTelemetry you already emit into records anyone can verify with standard cryptography. No schema change, no adapter to build. bridge.nexart.io
1
64
The most expensive AI failure is the one that leaves no record. An agent screens a payment and raises no alert. A KYC check comes back clean. A claims agent finds no reason to escalate. Each of those “nothing” outcomes is a decision. Most stacks record it as an absence. When the payment turns out to be fraud, the first question isn’t what the agent decided. It’s whether it actually looked. Did the sanctions lookup run, or time out? Did the model get the full transaction, or a truncated one? Did a fallback model answer because the primary was rate-limited? A log of successes can’t tell you. A silent failure and a clean pass look identical. The fix is unglamorous: every run produces a record, including the ones where a source refused, a call failed or the agent did nothing. And that record is sealed when it’s made, so “checked and found nothing” can’t be written in later. When one of your agents says “nothing to report”, what would you show to prove it actually checked? That’s the question I’m building NexArt around: records of what an AI system actually executed, verifiable by someone who doesn’t have to trust you.
2
2
7
248
How to turn Amazon Bedrock Converse calls into Certified Execution Records, verify them locally, protect sensitive values and add optional Node attestation nitter.gq/Nexart_io/status/21128…
How to turn Amazon Bedrock Converse calls into Certified Execution Records, verify them locally, protect sensitive values and add optional Node attestation
1
5
328
EN 18286 Is Now the First Harmonised AI Act Standard. Where Execution Evidence Fits in Your QMS
1
1
427
JB retweeted
NexArt is the AI evidence layer, but asking teams to rebuild their stack isn’t realistic. So I used @Replit to build bridge.nexart.io: bring your existing JSON, map it, and turn it into a verifiable Certified Execution Record. Replit helped me ship faster. Thanks @amasad!
2
3
384
NexArt is the AI evidence layer, but asking teams to rebuild their stack isn’t realistic. So I used @Replit to build bridge.nexart.io: bring your existing JSON, map it, and turn it into a verifiable Certified Execution Record. Replit helped me ship faster. Thanks @amasad!
2
3
384
Most teams already have the data to prove what their systems did. It's just stuck in logs nobody outside can trust. Evidence Bridge fixes that without asking anyone to rebuild anything. Really proud of this one.
Evidence Bridge turns the data your systems already produce into records that anyone can independently verify. bridge.nexart.io
2
290
Really happy to have @lmfresneda and HAGGIN on @Nexart_io The fun part of certifying a deal you're in: I can't edit it either. Not Luis, not me, not NexArt No SDK, no rebuild. Every handshake goes through the NexArt Bridge and comes out sealed A handshake used to be a promise. Now it's also proof Here's to the next thousand
4
7
305
Started another round of training ….
1
4
752
Someone offered $0 for HAGGIN Pro I accepted @arrotu runs NexArt, which certifies execution evidence so it can be independently verified later. His offer: Pro for free, and NexArt certifies every deal accepted on HAGGIN, 1,000 a month So the first deal on HAGGIN is a trade between two founders. And the acceptance of that deal is the first one certified
2
4
195
1
2
2
77
JB retweeted
AI approves, pays, decides and ships. Now every action can come with proof. Here's what I've been building 👇 nexart.io nitter.gq/Nexart_io/status/21057…
3
4
806
Just adjusted my 5 years plan to a 1 year plan for @Nexart_io
2
1,017
Logs describe. CERs prove. Tamper-evident records of what your AI actually executed, verifiable without an account. Nexart.io @Nexart_io
3
580
1
2
128