Petru C. (@atompulse) header
Petru C. (@atompulse) profile picture

programmer/philosopher/e-acc

Braşov, România
Joined November 2012
Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)Photo by Petru C. (@atompulse)
Petru C. retweeted
Anthropic just killed: > Google Sheets > Excel > TLDraw > Airtable > Miro > Excalidraw > FigJam > Whimsical > Lucidchart > Lucidspark > Mural > Tableau > Looker > Power BI > Metabase > Hex > Julius > Mode > Sigma > ThoughtSpot > Omni > Lightdash > Preset > Redash > Deepnote > Observable > Evidence > Qlik > Domo > Rows > Smartsheet > Coda > Notion databases > Equals > Causal > Pigment > Quadratic > Sourcetable > Grist > Baserow > NocoDB > SeaTable > Stackby > Zoho Sheet > Apple Numbers > LibreOffice Calc > Datawrapper > Flourish > Polymer > Akkio > Eraser > Napkin > Draw io > Visio > Gliffy > Creately > Milanote > Stormboard > Conceptboard > Klaxoon > Heptabase > Kinopio > Obsidian Canvas > Canva Whiteboards > Microsoft Whiteboard > Zoom Whiteboard > Apple Freeform Everything's totally fine.
Starting to roll out today: Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets and Claude Data. Think a plan through on a board, build a tracker in a sheet, and tell a story with your data.
380
474
133
6,499
1,121,035
It's absolutely insane how many people in my comments genuinely believe AI will lead to mass poverty rather than the greatest explosion of wealth and abundance in human history. Imagine looking at technology that will multiply human productivity by 100x, 1,000x, and more, and concluding that most people will somehow become poorer. The pessimism is extraordinary. The scarcity mindset is incredibly difficult to break.
168
68
7
649
14,839
Petru C. retweeted
unpopular but i think code review is dead not because agents write good code because nobody actually reads 2000 line diffs and we all know it
236
64
30
1,994
60,188
Let me briefly sum up where we are with AI. Everyone can feel it and everyone can see it. I believe 2026 is the turning point. We see major advances every day, but with all the excitement about the latest benchmarks, it’s easy to lose sight of the bigger picture. Anthropic has just released Claude Fable 5.2, its latest flagship model. It’s outstanding. Anyone who has tested it knows how good it is, and in its blog posts, Anthropic has also highlighted advances beyond coding: new findings in physics and hardware design, as well as a method for predicting viral protein structures developed with Mythos 5.2. Fable 5.2 even built an operating system prototype by coordinating more than 1,000 subagents over eight days. At the same time, Anthropic acknowledged in its system card that it has a separate, unreleased research model that is somewhat more capable than Mythos 5.2. This could be “Model 4,” although that connection has not been confirmed. Meanwhile, the competition isn’t slowing down. Google has caught up in a big way, and Gemini 4 Carbon is outstanding. Google also says it is using its own models for research and making new discoveries. Rumors suggest that a successor called Krypton is already being tested, though its capabilities remain unconfirmed. Today, the authors of AI 2027 updated their prediction. The AI Futures Project now forecasts that AI capable of doing the work of a team of top human AI researchers will likely arrive in 2027, absent a major slowdown. They estimate that AI-driven acceleration of AI research is already five months ahead of their original scenario. And we shouldn’t forget what AI systems have already achieved in mathematics. OpenAI says an internal system produced a solution to the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem. And this model is already outdated, as OpenAI said in their blogpost. What I’m trying to say is this: I regularly say that the takeoff began in 2026 and that 2027 will be a crazy year. Perhaps the craziest year in human history. But when we look back on this year, I think it will become clear just how crazy 2026 already was. I’ve devoted myself to AI since GPT-3.5, and I now work full-time to make this technological revolution tangible. Just a few years ago, LLMs like GPT-4 seemed like stochastic parrots. They hallucinated and, compared with today’s models, felt like trivial machines. Of course, they were never actually trivial. But looking back, the pace of development since o1 in late 2024 has kept increasing, and now the sudden explosion in capabilities feels tangible. So enjoy these last months of relative calm. I believe 2027 will be the year of superintelligence. And nothing will be the same again.
137
173
25
2,752
157,671
Starting a side hustle at 25: no kid rent split with mates if it flops you shrug and try the next thing Starting one at 44: a son a mortgage that went up about £400 a month one evening wasted actually costs something. Shout out to all the over forties fighting for a better future!
162
13
4
979
29,191
"But if AI does everything, what's left for humans?" What an unbelievably depressing question. As if the entire purpose of human existence was to perform economically valuable labor. As if spending 40 years answering emails, processing invoices, debugging software and sitting in meetings was the pinnacle of civilization. We invented machines to escape physical labor. We invented computers to escape repetitive calculations. Now we're inventing intelligence to escape cognitive labor. And somehow people have convinced themselves that this is a tragedy. I don't want humanity to spend the next thousand years finding new ways to keep everyone employed. I want humanity to reach a point where employment is no longer a prerequisite for survival. Why is that such a controversial ambition?
307
350
48
2,657
76,334
Petru C. retweeted
We've given all Pro, Max, Ultra, and Team users one free full reset, across all models and limits. Use it anytime before December 10 at 2:00PM PT. We recently fixed a few small issues that used more limits than intended, and the Fable resets didn't do much for those of you who'd already hit your weekly limits for all models. While these issues didn't affect everyone, we want to make up for the trouble. You'll find it in Settings > Usage, or at clau.de/reset.
1,770
2,748
1,912
44,008
2,975,524
Petru C. retweeted
Starting to roll out today: Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets and Claude Data. Think a plan through on a board, build a tracker in a sheet, and tell a story with your data.
1,428
4,925
3,636
60,907
11,194,910
Petru C. retweeted
Fable 5.2 is now available in the Claude Platform and Claude Code. It’s up to 30% faster than Fable 5.1, and costs $8/$40 per 1M tokens, down from $10/$50.
Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges. They’re capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.
319
670
189
11,177
516,392
Petru C. retweeted
Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges. They’re capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.
3,071
9,156
6,856
95,350
17,362,179
Petru C. retweeted
it's shocking that software engineering has transitioned to 100% AI written in such a short time. it's more shocking that somehow we, the SWEs, are all just continuing on as if nothing happened. It writes C++ better than I ever could, but the problem of making sure it works didn't magically disappear. we are just shipping enormously more volume at higher quality.
329
666
222
11,122
1,843,484
Petru C. retweeted
卧槽,这踏马太毒了 DeepMind 掌门人、诺奖得主 Demis Hassabis 刚刚把延续了上百年的现代学校教育底裤彻底扒光了: 全球几十万名数学老师每天关在办公室里,为同一门中学数学课重复手搓着一模一样的 PPT,这简直是人类智力资源最荒诞的工业级空转。 很多人至今还把名校名师的课堂讲授当成稀缺资源,拼了命去抢学区房和重点班, 但 Hassabis 直接用最冷酷的第一性原理砸碎了这个幻觉, 标准化的知识灌输从来不配占用昂贵的线下课堂,死记硬背和刷题完全应该被踢出教室,交给能按每个孩子毫秒级反应速度实时调频的私人 AI,加上全世界最顶尖的那几个大师录好底层大课,就足以把全球基础教育的讲授环节一次性彻底平替。 过去两百年里,学校本质上是一座把千差万别的碳基大脑强行塞进同一条流水线、按同一个节拍器拧螺丝的工业时代兵营, 老师沦为了人肉复读机,学生被困在枯燥的题海里比拼谁更像一台劣质硬盘, 而一旦 AI 和顶级大师把标准化的知识传递彻底接管,线下教室唯一剩下的合法存在价值,就只剩下了机器永远无法通过权重计算出来的五个维度: 人际博弈、复杂项目实战、创业野心、创造力,以及最致命的判断力。 这里有一个极度冷酷的反直觉真相: 当个性化 AI 把考高分的边际成本砸穿地板,按标准答案培养出来的做题家,在出校门的那一刻就已经直接沦为了算力废料。 未来的阶层分化,从来不再取决于谁的脑子里背下了更多现成的公式, 而是取决于当 AI 把一万种完美方案同时拍在桌上时,谁拥有拍板做决定的判断力,谁能攒起一个活人团队去把事情干成, 所以别再逼着孩子在死记硬背的泥潭里跟硅基芯片比拼记忆容量了,当流水线式的教书匠和做题家同时迎来历史性失业,谁能先把教室变成训练人性直觉与创业野心的实战沙盘,谁才能在算力时代拿到唯一不被平替的入场券
370
1,555
243
8,156
836,574
Disengaging from syntax is not disengaging from engineering. I’m working on a significant project at the moment. It’s in a pre-production state so far. More than a prototype, less than ready for real users. I’ve been making multiple passes over the structure for each of the following concerns: Architecture, coverage, race & concurrency, security, API, etc. Each of these requires significant interrogation and review of verification procedures; but not review of the code. At base are the /ub-mode (GitHub.com/unclebob) rules that keep the agents disciplined as far as coding structure and tests are concerned. But above that it’s me making sure that all the bases are covered well enough to keep my client safe from stupid sloppy mistakes. I am the engineer. I am responsible. The agents are just my tools. They are power tools, to be sure. But power tools in the hands of novices result in missing fingers. So I am very careful.
66
79
16
1,151
54,848
Petru C. retweeted
Humans spend the first 20 years studying. Then we spend the next 40 years working just to survive. And for the last 20 years, we slowly die in pain with a broken body. Human life is a crazy loop of bad design and suffering. The only thing that can fix this and bring us real happiness is AI.
85
76
12
702
19,730
AI is making me realize just how much of the economy runs on human incompetence. Waiting days for someone to answer an email. Paying hundreds of dollars for something that takes 30 seconds. Dealing with people who don’t understand their own jobs. Getting charged extra because someone made a mistake. We’ve normalized an absurd amount of inefficiency simply because humans were the only option. Now there’s another option. And people are calling it an existential threat. Maybe the real existential threat is to the business model of being mediocre and getting paid anyway.
154
297
44
2,330
44,363
If you understand code, you can spot-check most languages — even if you don’t know them. Mid and high level structure are pretty obvious in virtually all languages. Names are self-evident. The captain knows how the ship works at a high level. He does not know the torque rating of every bolt.
97
117
25
2,136
106,524
Petru C. retweeted
Unix was born on Nov 3, 1971. 🎂 Respect to legends Ken Thompson & Dennis Ritchie, the world runs on their vision. 🫡✨
32
343
22
1,474
29,509
There IS going to be the first massively successful AI generated game. And when that happens everything is going to change
55
19
2
508
14,359
Petru C. retweeted
New Anthropic research: progress on provable inference for large language models. Here, we introduce FlashProve. Building on established cryptographic techniques, FlashProve allows developers to verify whether a given response came from a given AI model. It’s substantially more efficient than prior open-source methods for doing so. These proofs have a range of applications. They can, for instance, make it harder for attackers to hijack a chat, or enable safety evaluators to verify that the model they’re testing is the same one being served to customers. For our full write-up, see here: anthropic.com/research/prova… Further progress in provable inference will likely be an important part of improving trust in AI deployment. To that end, we're open-sourcing FlashProve’s code, here: github.com/anthropics/FlashP… We’re grateful to our collaborators: Alessandro Chiesa, @GiacomoFenzi, @gwberg95, @miranda__christ, Rahul Dalal (rdalal.github.io) and Ben Mayer (@transmissions11).
657
540
500
5,288
731,220
Anthropic’s 15-person chip design team is using Claude to develop its own AI chips, The Information reports. The team has found that Claude speeds up the work compared with its estimates of traditional chip design workflows. In doing so, Anthropic is following the path taken by OpenAI, which has designed its own chip, codenamed "Jalapeño."
107
51
23
1,063
117,037