Former English teacher and literacy consultant. Lover of books, film and the great outdoors. Champion of Scottish life and culture. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Ayr, Scotland
Joined November 2008
BREAKING: Neil Young has just sued Trump for playing "Rockin' in the Free World" at his rally in Ohio. The lawsuit states: “In short, the Song is the opposite of everything that Donald J. Trump stands for.” Thank you Mr. Young!
888
5,164
162
22,162
177,333
Bill Boyd retweeted
No...that's not what it exposed.... It exposed how many of our politicians and press are bought...
Sir David Bell's report exposed the abhorrent scale of antisemitism in our schools and colleges. The Government has rightly accepted all the recommendations, including treating antisemitism as a safeguarding issue. I asked the Education Secretary how the duty will work:
2
3
134
Bill Boyd retweeted
Is their anything more vomit-inducing than watching on the BBC - 'Labour Friends of Israel - in the process of inventing & spreading lies, to smear good UK people - in order to be seen to be earning their Zionist 'blood money'? bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq39…
34
409
5
711
4,225
Bill Boyd retweeted
The mask slips.
If, by the way, the same situation that just happened in Brazil had happened but with the parties switched -- if Bolsonaro had won last night's election and then a pro-Bolsonaro judge sent the Federal Police to seize Lula's passport and bar him from leaving the country -- every major western media outlet and liberal NGOs would be screaming about the authoritarian attack on Brazil's elections and the destruction of basic freedoms.
13
18
240
21,291
The Spectator exists in a different reality.
111
470
33
5,316
60,284
Bill Boyd retweeted
Ethnic cleansing should never be treated as a legitimate topic of political debate. Ben Gvir's willingness to discuss it so casually reveals a deeply troubling and merciless worldview.
Israel should "conquer" all of Gaza and send the refugees to France, Britain, and other European countries, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir tells the Jerusalem Post in Hebrew. Gaza is "Jewish territory," he insists.
4
14
29
579
Bill Boyd retweeted
The genocide in Gaza and the war in Ukraine are linked. They are linked when you consider that none of the guards at Auschwitz, Treblinka and Sobibor spoke Arabic, but many of them did speak Ukrainian.
13
70
3
254
8,034
La France détient dans ses archives diplomatiques d'État la preuve matérielle que la soi-disant "Union volontaire" de 1707 entre deux États souverains via un soi-disant "Traité d'Union" ne fut jamais consentie par l'Écosse. Ce texte ne fut d'ailleurs jamais appliqué, ne constituant rien d'autre qu'un traité colonial, semblable aux plus de 200 traités inégaux que l'Angleterre a imposés par la ruse et la force aux peuples colonisés à travers le monde, maquillant une annexion coloniale statutaire exécutée sous blocus économique, corruption avérée et menace puis invasion militaire. Pour maintenir cette fiction juridique face au monde, l'État colonial anglais a menti à la communauté internationale, notamment en instrumentalisant les conclusions de la Royal Commission on Scottish Affairs (1952-1954) pour perpétuer le mythe d'une "union volontaire et partenariale" et masquer la réalité de l'annexion. Ce fait ne relève pas de la querelle historiographique. Les preuves matérielles reposent au cœur des archives du Ministère des Affaires étrangères. Des registres contiennent les rapports de mission et de renseignement militaire du colonel Nathaniel Hooke, envoyé secret de Louis XIV en Écosse en 1707. Hooke y a consigné de première main le rejet massif de l'annexion par la population et la noblesse écossaises, ainsi que l'état de siège imposé par l'armée anglaise. Sur la base directe de ces pièces, le Conseil d'État réuni à Marly autour de Louis XIV a consigné et qualifié l'opération d'annexion illégale et forcée. En 1965, sous la présidence de Charles de Gaulle, la République française a elle-même levé tout doute en authentifiant, imprimant et publiant ces preuves d'État par le biais de la Commission des Archives diplomatiques du Ministère des Affaires étrangères et des Éditions du CNRS. La détention et la publication de ces archives ne sont pas des actes mémoriels neutres. Elles engagent la responsabilité juridique contemporaine et continue de la France au regard du droit international public. 1. L'anéantissement de la fiction contractuelle: Le narratif officiel de Londres d'une union consentie entre partenaires égaux est anéanti par les registres d'une chancellerie souveraine contemporaine des faits. Un accord extorqué par la contrainte armée et économique est nul de plein droit (ab initio). L'Écosse n'a jamais consenti à son annexion coloniale. 2. La connaissance d'État opposable: En tant que membre permanent du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU, la France dispose d'une connaissance officielle, ininterrompue et déjà publiée de l'illicéité fondamentale de cette annexion. L'argument de l'ignorance diplomatique est juridiquement inopérant face aux mensonges de l'État colonial anglais. 3. Les obligations erga omnes et le jus cogens: L'interdiction d'acquérir un territoire par la contrainte et le droit inaliénable des peuples à l'autodétermination relèvent de normes impératives du droit international général (jus cogens). Il en découle pour la France une obligation stricte due à la communauté internationale dans son ensemble: le devoir de non-reconnaissance de cette situation territoriale illicite et l'interdiction absolue de prêter aide ou assistance au maintien d'une occupation coloniale. 4. Décolonisation et reprise d'État (state resumption) : En droit international de la décolonisation, une annexion illicite ne transfère aucun titre territorial de souveraineté à la puissance occupante. La personnalité juridique de l'État d'Écosse n'a jamais été légalement éteinte. Son droit à la décolonisation et à la réversion de souveraineté demeure imprescriptible. En publiant ces pièces d'archives souveraines, la France a acté la nature coloniale du "Royaume-Uni" et éventé la supercherie de la Commission royale. Le droit international et le respect des normes erga omnes obligent aujourd'hui @francediplo à aligner sa doctrine diplomatique sur ses propres archives d'État. @CIJ_ICJ @un @FrenchResponse @francediplo_EN @FranceintheUK @cgfEdimbourg
France Holds the File: A Permanent Member of the UN Security Council Documented Scotland's Annexation in Its Own State Archive & Proved There Was No Voluntary Union. France Published the Proof Itself Under De Gaulle. Its Erga Omnes Obligations Apply. decolonise.scot/france-holds…
1
78
94
1,148
Bill Boyd retweeted
UK Chancellor pledges cheaper marmalade and gherkins in pre-Budget package of 'everyday fixes'. Fiddling at the edges. Need redistribution of income and wealth. End profiteering in housing, energy, water, essentials. Increase tax personal allowance. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6d9…
91
410
27
803
14,041
Bill Boyd retweeted
“If you cut taxes for the rich, they’ll create jobs.”🤡
Microsoft just made $133.7 BILLION in net income last year. Today they announced they are getting rid of 60,000 workers. Fuck these companies man.
310
11,641
90
83,510
1,077,231
Children bidding farewell to a fallen angel in Gaza. SHOT BY AN ISRAELI SOLDIER USING A CHILD FOR TARGET PRACTICE.
37
428
17
606
7,057
3 hours ago the Brazilian Supreme Court rejected any challenge to the election results. Just now Flavio Bolsonaro has dropped his objections. Lula is President it cannot be stopped, and Flavio Bolsonaro will be going on trial for corruption. And then to jail.
80
1,541
22
7,635
47,813
Today marks 100 days since Andy Burnham became Prime Minister. He could have stopped arms sales to the genocidal apartheid state of Israel on day one. He chose not to. For 100 days, he has willingly continued selling UK arms that enable the genocide of the Palestinian people. 100 days of personal complicity. Stop ALL arms sales to Israel NOW.
885
1,271
55
3,460
55,306
Bill Boyd retweeted
They're just pissing right in your face and telling you it's raining.
NEW: U.S. intelligence warns of possible Iranian plots to kill Americans overseas, with some reportedly reaching "advanced stages." The reported threats extend beyond the Middle East, raising concerns about how widespread the targeting could be. @AmericaRpts
62
1,180
15
5,643
45,903
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU ALL WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU
232
2,072
104
5,319
166,108
URGENT: Guy Christensen @guychristensen_ is currently being detained by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at LAX upon his return from China. Under the Fifth Amendment the right of U.S. citizens to travel freely cannot be suppressed or penalized based on political speech or beliefs. We demand his immediate release,
89
1,809
31
4,278
50,041
#NationalBlackCatDay in Scots lore, 'cait sìth' is a faerie cat, a faerie that takes the shape of a black cat with a distinctive white spot on it's chest there's also: 'lucha sìth', the faerie mouse; 'cu sìth', the faerie dog more: "Folklore of Scotland" folkloreofscotland.com/
3
52
3
202
2,155
Bill Boyd retweeted
Ukraine is not fighting on the side of freedom.
Europe stands united with Ukraine. Their front line for freedom is our front line for freedom. We will be with you for as long as it takes.
350
40
9
418
15,978
What the israelis are planning is terrifying, says Peter Oborne, who’s just returned from Palestine: and it’s worse than you think, he warns doubledown.news/watch/2026/o…
6
100
5
131
3,908
Bill Boyd retweeted
That story about Google killing hundreds of thousands of trees in Finland for its data center project is such a perfect microcosm of what capitalism is doing to our world. Recent mass media headlines are saying the tech giant "illegally" cut down "250,000" trees, but both claims paint an inaccurate picture of what actually happened. Google killed 400,000 trees (250,000 near a town called Muhos and another 150,000 near the village of Otanmäki), and unless the company's executives actually wind up going to prison for this, their actions cannot properly be described as "illegal". I don't know who first coined the saying "If the penalty is a fine, then it's legal for rich people," but it certainly applies here. The Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority has reportedly ordered Google to suspend all “measures that significantly change the environment," saying it will "consider enforcement proceedings and fines" if the megacorporation does not comply. Google's parent company Alphabet has a net worth of around four trillion dollars. Whatever paltry penalties Finland might impose for these ecocidal actions, it won't have any meaningful effect on Google. Giant corporations do this shit all the time. They calculate that the fines incurred by their abusive actions will be dwarfed by the massive profits they generate, issue fake apologies as needed, and leave it to their armies of lawyers to minimize the damage. That's why the Sackler family is still worth billions despite all the fines Purdue Pharma was slapped with while creating the US opiate epidemic. A 2017 Harvard study titled “The Opioid Epidemic: Fixing a Broken Pharmaceutical Market" contains the following paragraph: "Although civil claims and criminal charges were brought against Purdue and its executives, the resulting penalties paled in comparison to extended-release oxycodone profits. In May 2007, the company and its president, chief counsel, and former chief medical officer pled guilty to falsely marketing extended-release oxycodone as 'less addictive, less subject to abuse and diversion, and less likely to cause tolerance and withdrawal than other pain medications.' As part of the plea bargain, Purdue agreed to pay the federal government $600 million and 27 states $20 million. The three executives agreed to $34.5 million in fines but avoided jailtime. By contrast, Purdue has earned an estimated $31 billion in total revenues from extended-release oxycodone since its launch. Rather than deterring fraudulent marketing, the penalties simply became a cost of doing business." A cost of doing business. That's how things work under capitalism. The law primarily exists not to protect people or the environment, but to protect the interests of capital. If you destroyed a Google data center you'd probably be charged as a terrorist and spend decades in prison, but Google can destroy the natural world around you and get off with a finger wag and a symbolic fine. If you stole millions of dollars from your employer you'd go to prison for grand larceny, but if your employer steals millions from its employees you need to win a class action lawsuit to get back what they stole from you. Proponents of capitalism often pretend they support minimal government intervention in civilian affairs, but their entire model is at all times propped up by state power using force to protect the haves from the have-nots at every level of our society. Corporations are free to destroy the environment, destroy your health, rob you, exploit you, and manipulate your government to their advantage, and if you ever take action to stand up to this world-devouring onslaught, the state will lock you in a cage. In school we are taught that that the law exists to protect ordinary people from bad people, but that's not true at all. Under capitalism, the law exists to protect the very worst among us from everyone else. That's why we are seeing our planet being turned into dust and ashes for no reason other than shareholder profit. It's an insane system, and it needs to end. These freaks are feeding our entire biosphere into the woodchipper.
118
2,153
108
5,305
78,466