Vision Scientist at Apple. Interested in binocular visual perception in humans. Mostly @bakerdh@fediscience.org

Cupertino, CA
Joined July 2010
All of our contributing authors were extremely cooperative, and clearly saw the benefit of their work being reproducible. We think this is how all scientific results should be reported. However we recognise several barriers to wider adoption, chiefly expertise and time 3/6
1
2
139
We have made available some repositories of example markdown scripts, as well as a ‘cookbook’ of useful tips here: github.com/bakerdh/Reproduce… Hopefully this will help others to develop the necessary skills 4/6
2
129
The question now is what we should do next. We have a really nice pipeline for automatically building markdown files on Github. But the process of making papers reproducible is time consuming.
152
However for all four types of mask the group posteriors overlapped with a value of 1. This means we lack convincing evidence for an effect of either type of suppression (though there was more evidence for contrast gain than response gain) [5/9]
1
Next we ran two new experiments, directly comparing four types of mask in the same participants. We used a similar model to estimate group posterior parameter distributions, and found clear evidence for contrast gain control at the occipital pole (Oz) for all masks [6/9]