GPT-6.1 Terra: delivering fast and capable computer use at a lower price. GPT-6.1 Terra understands what’s on screen, takes action across apps, writes naturally, and is a more capable model for your whole workday with the efficiency to take on more of it.

🥳 🔥 바이브 코딩 하시는 분들을 위한... 원한다면 맥북 덮개 덮어도 늘 깨어서 작업이 돌아가고 있을 수 있게 만드는 맥북 앱을 만들었습니다 ㅋㅋ KTX(기차) 혹은 버스, 카페에서 업무를 보다가 이동 시 와이파이 끊기고 테더링 옮기고 노트북 열고다니고 하는거 전부 해결! 자세한 기능은 👇👇

LOING is cooking~! Mega update is coming soon! 🎃

🚀 DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is here! Stronger benchmark performance, faster task completion, and shorter outputs than the previous version—a Pareto improvement in performance and cost. Now live on our website, app, and API. 🛠️ Optimized for @DeepSeekHarness, Tencent CodeBuddy, WorkBuddy, and more. Upgrade to DeepSeek Harness v0.2.1-rc.1 or later for the best experience with the new model. 1/4

this isn't the first, and won't be the last time we shake our fist and yell about public benchmarks, so we want to try something new. we’re sharing our own internal best guesses on how to measure the form factor of intelligence that matters most for developers like you.

진짜 오랫동안 OpenAI의 Fan이었는데, 요새 Claude의 행보 + OpenAI의 똥볼때문에 클로드가 너무 좋아졌으... OpenAI로 직접 코딩 안한지가 얼마나 오랜지....🍊 직접은 GPT 6.1 Sol만 쓰고있고 이건 Hermes로 사무적인 업무 처리용 Astra는 대형 언어 모델 맛을 포기 못하는게 있어서 문제 번역에 크레딧 쓰고있음....

This hacker is truly legendary. A complete amateur. 1. He left directory listing enabled on his own server, so researchers could figure out who he was with barely any effort. 2. They found files like CLAUDE.md and went through his Claude Code sessions. 3. There were questions like, “Where can I sell this data?” 4. He’d also asked, “Can you write my résumé?” That pretty much handed them all his personal information. 5. Apparently, he’s a student at South China University of Technology living in Guangdong. His name, phone number, and where he lives have all been identified.

Gemini 4 Argon Coming Today - There is a high chance Gemini 4 Argon is coming today. If there's no delay, today or tomorrow is most likely the launch. - Pricing: Global: $4 input / $20 output - Flex/Batch: $2 input / $10 output - Global cached input: $0.20/M - Flex/Batch cached input: $0.10/M Finally, its not far. Its already in Google Cloud, so yeah, high chances of a launch today.

What hurts more than the shutdown of @AbstractChain itself is the attitude and explanation Luca showed across Discord and the Spaces. Shutting down a chain to prevent reckless token launches amid financial exhaustion and poor market conditions is a business decision one can logically understand. But narrative he pushed today sounded far less like the calculated leadership of a founder and far more like defensive complaining designed to shift the blame of system failure onto the community. The most damaging remark was his claim that whether you spent money and time on the chain he lost a few million as well so everyone is in the same boat. This is textbook deflective communication that invalidates the other party entirely. The entrepreneurial risk a founder shoulders and the opportunity cost of regular users who poured time and liquidity into an ecosystem based on trust are fundamentally different. Equating the community devotion to personal capital loss as if both sides are even completely dismisses the organic effort people put in. It is equally contradictory to complain that capital was drained by cherry pickers and airdrop farmers while asking why people could not just be real users instead of farming. The team itself designed the system where every onchain activity was tied to XP and reinforced by a competitive ranking structure. Designing an incentive loop that naturally drives farming behavior and then blaming the users who acted logically within those rules is nothing more than deflecting a failure in product and game design. The vast majority of the explanation today centered on self defense such as fearing community disappointment and pleading for empathy regarding how hard he fought. Abstract shutdown was certainly not an impulse decision made overnight. It was likely a calculated exit strategy planned weeks in advance with legal counsel. The fact that after so much preparation the core takeaway delivered to the public was the posture of being the ultimate victim reveals a severe absence of true accountability. Closing the Spaces by apologizing for the wasted time and money on Abstract while asserting that his ultimate responsibility lies with Pudgy Penguins is a convenient shield. The core users who rushed in early to generate volume and support the chain were the exact supporters who believed in @pudgypenguins vision in the first place. Using one community as a moral shield to write off the disappointment of another cannot be branded as responsibility. A venture can miss its golden window and fail due to poor execution or macro conditions. What remains unacceptable is belittling the participants of a game you designed while using personal losses to erase the collective sacrifice of the community. When a project that champions a community first ethos concludes with this level of disregard it sets a bitter precedent for anyone considering putting their time and faith into a founder vision.