telegram: @nicoIas_danyIove github: @bbbmining21 Web3/ Blockchain consultant |sometimes political|
@home.de/web3
Joined June 2022
- Tweets5.7K
- Following543
- Followers340
- Likes26.5K
t-online.de/finanzen/ratgebe…
Ich habe einen Gegenvorschlag:
Es sitzen 630 nutzlose repräsentative Demokraten im Bundestag.
Dann noch 1789 in den Landtagen.
96 im Europäischen Parlament
Switching to a centralized chain, where the validators are hosting their nodes mainly over cloud flare related providers and the co founder is a grifter, who just endorses gambling projects and let's use case projects die off- I thought core team would care more about Akash
Just wanna tidy up with a couple myth narratives.
1. Solana doesn't have users. It got gambling addicts and an aggressive liquidity siphoning developer mindset
2. Projects like Helium and Render are almost dead and have no traction
3. You will build alone. All SOL projects do
By the way, I called, this is gonna happen, when they announced their migration to Solana over the heads of community members.
It's even worse:
Neither of those projects are surviving.
Helium is already abandoning their Telegram group.
Nobody uses render.
Solana is a liquidity extraction chain that doesn't give building projects anything back in return.
Name me one successful use case project on SOL
Helium and render on Solana already have a moat around them and will eat our lunch on Solana..
What about the AKT tokens that we were supposed to be able to use for Travel or staking?
-can I remind you that we are going up against / specialist clouds:
* Hyperscalers such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure
* GPU-focused providers such as CoreWeave, Lambda, RunPod, and Vast.ai
And that Other decentralized compute networks already exist- (some already on Solana)
* io.net (GPU aggregation aimed at AI training and inference)
* Render Network (GPU rendering and compute)
* Flux, Golem, iExec, Aethir, and similar marketplace-style projects...
-- people building and actually using different AKT versus those who just staking it or buying it at a low price to sell at a high price... I thought this was obvious, maybe not, anyways, this is painful for this chain.. right when I thought we were going to break out🥺
So if you wanna find out the quality of women in your city, you gotta create a Chad and Pooth account and compare.
If Chad has more likes, you may have a reason to begin searching for a partner. If Pooth wins, outsource your search more into the region
NicoIas_DanyIove retweeted
The Government™ has made an ad about the protests happening around the world, and it’s surprisingly honest and informative.🌍🌎🌏
NicoIas_DanyIove retweeted
OH FFS! Elon’s arguments are getting more and more absurd by the minute.
Until 10 days ago, 99.9% of the world’s population didn’t even know there was a difference between Starlink and Starshield — or, for that matter, that Starshield even existed. If Zelenskyy had mentioned Starshield at that time, no one would have understood what he was even talking about.
Ukraine’s propeller-driven mid-range strike drones fly at a speed of approximately 200 km/h. Jet-powered ones fly at speeds of 400–700 km/h. - THIS IS TECHNICALLY IMPOSSIBLE WITH A STARLINK TERMINAL THAT IS NOT MILITARILY REGISTERED WITH STARSHIELD. PERIOD!
Elon is trying, under pressure from the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Senate, to wriggle out of a situation from which he can no longer easily extricate himself. - Zelenskyy’s use of imprecise terminology here as “proof” of the military use of civilian Starlink for strike drones shows that he’s currently scared out of his wits about this issue.
NicoIas_DanyIove retweeted
So they finally caught up to Jared. Let’s hope they do something about it.
🤖 Made with AI
Well in that case, if what you say, is not another of your lies, you just made yourself guilty of war crimes, as Russia used Starlink to kill civilians with it. And you did nothing to stop it nor did you condemn, nor file a case in The Hague against it.
@IntlCrimCourt
All your children, that you process and cripple with weird names will read about your treacherous and inhumane deeds in history books. You'll be another Henry Ford and Thomas J. Watson.
Oh and the only war mongorer in the room is you now. You basically sided with Russian propaganda, who have a huge illiteracy in constitutions.
Even after overwriting their own, they still can't abide by it. And so do they with the Ukrainian one.
Plus the blood on your hands of the killed women and children, which died, because you slowed Starlink for Ukraine, which you also lied about not having done.
That's gross negligence manslaughter.
@IntlCrimCourt
Well in that case, if what you say, is not another of your lies, you just made yourself guilty of war crimes, as Russia used Starlink to kill civilians with it. And you did nothing to stop it nor did you condemn, nor file a case in The Hague against it.
@IntlCrimCourt
Correct.
Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be.
Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them.
Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week.
Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact.
Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia.
SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR.
That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell.
End of story.
NicoIas_DanyIove retweeted
Elon Musk claims that Ukraine allegedly violated Starlink's terms of use and used the system on combat drones.
As someone who was inside the process at the Ministry of Defense, I can say with certainty that this is not true.
In February of this year, whitelists were introduced. Stationary terminals could be registered by both military personnel and civilians.
But for any satellite terminal to work while on the move, it had to be added to a special list and connected to the military Starshield system. Otherwise, no satellite communication terminals in Ukraine would work.
In other words, using civilian Starlink for drone missions was technically impossible. All drone missions that required satellite communication could only be carried out using Starshield.
We are very grateful to the United States and SpaceX for access to critically important satellite communications. Ukraine did not violate the terms of use.
Only a piece of shit would use his own influence to spread unproven and unfounded Kremlin narratives about a country, that stands between western democracy and Russian imperialism.
But what would a sociopath autist understand about human values...