bimri (@bimr1) header
bimri (@bimr1) profile picture

Inspire. Kemet 🌍 is my MUSE | Poet | Intelligence design | Eternally curious 👽 |

kemet
Joined May 2011
Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)Photo by bimri (@bimr1)
eternally curious. est., circa - 2014
1
1
2
1,811
I concur.
Brute force computation is not enough for intelligence. Clever new methods are needed. The science of AI is far from finished. IMHO
8
Founders getting ready to do 30 minutes of marketing after 1 year of building features:
107
255
54
2,408
100,558
I understood this at twenty.
The older I get the more I realize that most career advice is just people defending a path they already took.
8
Replying to @bimr1
Profound! Nobody has the map. The greatest skill we can all muster is anticipation. However, in the era of AI, that too seems to get disrupted soon. I need to give Ra a try. It’s a solution I need today.
1
1
1
12
having spent a long time on being self-taught in AI & anticipating this new age of learning on the fly; i thought it best to shape it for others who want to try their luck in shaping their own destinies in these turbulent times i have built this helper, RA: - to be your guide.
1
5
1
11
296
tough
Everyone's waiting until they get their PhD Everyone's waiting until they get the post-doc Everyone's waiting until they get tenure track Everyone's waiting until they get tenure Everyone's waiting until they get full prof Everyone's waiting until they retire Everyone's waiting
46
I've hired 500+ people as a startup founder. almost all of my worst hires had impressive LinkedIns almost all of my best had wild GitHubs and crazy side projects
147
36
16
1,140
53,983
true; whether they build it correctly/safely/effectively - is a different matter. there are levels to this...
I've been in tech for 46 years. The biggest change AI brings isn't speed. It's that a regular person with an idea can finally build it without asking anyone for permission.
23
been saying this since 2016... folks are catching up.
the old education system is like dead dead there's literally never been a better time in history to homeschool your kids with AI you can now just prompt it to create an entire curriculum for your kid, give lessons, generate interactive quizzes to see what they're actually learning, explain things in a hundred different ways until they understand, adapt the difficulty and pace to their progress, generate videos, etc etc you could probably give your kids a much better education in a fraction of the time they'd otherwise spend sitting in a classroom learning the same things at the same pace as 30 other kids and then spend all that extra time playing with them, exploring, doing sports, reading, traveling, whatever it's actually insane when you think about it
8
Neil still hasn't reached his Damascus moment.
My mother was a philosophy professor in Oxford ... and at age 8 I was fond of declaring "If there's one thing I'll never be when I'm grown up it's a philosopher!" Well, decades later, my science led me to figure out some rather interesting things in philosophy ... and now there's a book of my philosophical essays just published. amazon.com/Ultimately-There-…
11
bimri retweeted
Yann LeCun: The AI industry is completely LLM-pilled. Everybody is working on the same thing. “They’re all digging the same trench.” “They’re stealing each other’s engineers, so they can’t afford to do something different.” “If they start going on a tangent, they’re going to fall behind the other guys.” “It’s one big reason I left Meta. Meta also became LLM-pilled.” “I cannot imagine that we can build agentic systems without those systems being able to predict the consequences of their actions.”
105
50
33
564
224,466
The right to bear VRAM shall not be infringed.
Unfortunately, a great point by Sam. If we really are in such a memory crunch, in what world does it make sense to have all the world’s DDR distributed across local devices being used only 5% of the day? Inference economics would be much more favorable if memory costs could be amortized over higher utilization.
1
1
8
270
trust the Internet to ruin good things, like being a polymath. it's only downhill from here.
good time for all techbros to embrace the polymath lifestyle be interested and curious about math, robotics, bio, medicine, neuroscience, art, music, design, culture, philosophy, ethics, history we all should be davincimaxxing
1
15
English 🤦🏾‍♂️
The adjective for metal is metallic, but not for iron, which is ironic. Thank you.
1
12
courageous genius
courage in shorter supply than genius
13
passion triumphs in the end
This is what happens when designers actually care about the details. Cloud upload screen designed and animated for an app 🌥️
7
been on this wave since a decade ago!
the best university in 2030 won't have professors, lectures, or exams. AI will be the tutor. peer relationships will be put into focus. what is built, a portfolio, will be the new "degree".
1
17
folks love dunkin' in Chomsky like what!
Chomsky was wrong. Researchers found your brain doesn’t store language the way every textbook since 1957 claims. For decades, the undisputed rule of linguistics, led by Noam Chomsky, was that human language is hierarchical. We were told our brains process language using complex "grammar trees." That we secretly build deep, abstract, mathematical rules in our heads before we speak. This new paper proves that is completely wrong. Researchers at Cornell University analyzed how people actually process and produce language in real time. They found sequences. Linear chunks. When we speak, we aren't calculating deep syntactic rules. We are just predicting the next most logical sequence of words based on the context of the words right before it. We string linear chunks together. If this sounds familiar, it should. This is exactly how Large Language Models like ChatGPT work. For years, critics have dismissed AI as "just a next-token predictor." They said it isn't truly intelligent because it doesn't understand deep grammatical hierarchies like humans do. But this paper suggests humans don't use those hierarchies either. We are just predicting the next chunk. Language isn't a rigid tree of mathematical rules. It's a linear stream of contextual predictions. We thought we were building AI to mimic the complexity of the human brain. It turns out, the human brain was just running a simpler algorithm all along.
14
for anyone that needs to hear this (me) Ship that side project, even if you think no one nowadays cares. You care.
99
64
14
1,120
30,302