Bobby retweeted
curious how much robinhood:0x000050e18ffa3f8f7ad170eb9cef160eb3ed1111 has spent on marketing to get this kind of traction?
absolutely $0.
turns out when you build genuinely impressive tech, people actually love using your platform, and real activity generates real revenue, the growth starts speaking for itself.
just a product people want to use and a revenue flywheel that gets stronger with adoption.
study the flywheel. study @torchpaddotfun 🔥
i said this would happen a long time ago. 🐸
9 days old and $TORCH is approaching $15M market cap.
this will touch billions.
why? because i studied.
@Torchpaddotfun
Bobby retweeted
$TORCH — My official Investometer 🗽
Torch is the trade + launch terminal for the new chain cycle, launch tokens, trade them, and burn supply on every single trade.
One non custodial place that does the job of a launchpad and a trading terminal at the same time.
But is @torchpaddotfun a good investment or not?
Lets find out now 👇🧵
Technology:
Launch + Trade Terminal
Launch a token and immediately trade it (and others) from the same place. Web terminal + Telegram bot, both non custodial.
Native Uniswap V4 on Robinhood Chain
No bonding curve, no migration. The pool is the market from the first block.
Locked LP Forever
Launch liquidity is locked with no withdraw function, nobody can pull it.
Telegram Bot + Web Terminal
Same wallet and balance across both.
Charts, limits, and one click execution.
Non custodial (Turnkey)
Your keys stay yours.
The platform never holds the tokens.
Burns on every trade
Every swap through the terminal or bot triggers a buyback and burn of the token being traded.
➡️ 82% score — very good.
Tokenomics: 📊
• Fixed 1B supply, no mint
• Circulating = total = 1B
• 2% buy tax only (70% holders/burns, 30% platform)
• Liquidity locked forever
• Market cap: $7M
• Price: $0.0070
• Liquidity: $1.6M locked
• 24h volume: $1.2M
• Holders: 1,700+
➡️ 72% score — good.
Community: 💪
• torchpaddotfun 3.7k followers
• Building in public with constant updates
• 1,700+ holders already
• Live since Oct 10
• Docs live
• Active Telegram
➡️ 70% score — good.
Narrative: 📢
• Launchpad + trading terminal narrative
• Same lane as PUMP / STONK style products
• Robinhood Chain native
• Uniswap V4 from day one
• Burns on every trade
• Multichain terminal ambitions
➡️ 80% score — very good.
Team: 👥
• Building in public
• torchpad.fun live
• Terminal + bot free to use
• Non custodial from day one
• Known handle torchpaddotfun
• Shipping fast (product already live and iterating)
➡️ 74% score — good.
Partnerships: 🤝
No formal or direct partnerships announced yet TORCH is only about 8 days old, so this is expected.
What is real right now:
• You can trade and launch directly through their terminal and Telegram bot
• Built natively on Robinhood Chain
• Uses Uniswap V4 pools from the first block
• Non-custodial flow via Turnkey
These are integrations and usability points, not official partnerships. You can use the product and trade there today; they are not “partnered with” these protocols in the formal sense.
➡️ 70% score — usable and integrated, not formal partnerships.
Investometer Score: 76% 🔋
Conclusion: Yes, $TORCH is a clean early stage play in the launchpad/terminal category.
Fixed supply, locked liquidity forever, burns on every trade, and a working non custodial product already live.
Utility projects on TORCH are groundbreaking technology. $ANTI and many others are hitting new highs while showing strong growth, and @Torchpaddotfun is gaining increasing recognition.
Still very early, so size it properly and watch volume + holder growth from here.
$torch is going to fly
$PONS has 2.64x more liquidity than $TORCH.
But the relative numbers tell a different story.
> PONS: $2.9M liquidity at $199M MC = 1.46%.
> TORCH: $1.1M liquidity at $3.7M MC = 29.73%.
That’s 20.4x more liquidity relative to market cap.
Add Torch’s trading fee flywheel, token burns and revenue sharing for holders, and there’s more to the thesis than just the valuation.
Pick your winner.
I’m lighting my Torch 🔥
$torch on the move!!!
Bobby retweeted
Been a great launch for $TORCH but most people still don't grasp how Torch changes the game.
In the coming days I'll zoom in on some parts that showcase the unique potential of this project.
One of their strategies is to not just compete, but complete.
And it is one of the cleverest things I’ve seen in a while.
You can launch through @ponsdotfamily, @LaunchOnSF or @Pumpfun through the terminal, with built-in mechanics so it’s better to launch from Torch than from the actual launchpad. For example, part of the fees are burning the newly created token, instead of just filling the pockets of PumpFun or Pons.
Every creator should want to launch through Torch terminal. It's just basic economics.
Straight up genius.
Light the Torch!
@Torchpaddotfun
Im confident this will be sent hard in the coming weeks - that is all $torch
the torch future: what comes next
the trading bot is live, the web terminal is live and the launchpad is in place.
the next phase is about one thing: sending more of what torch earns back to the people who use it, and bringing more projects, liquidity and volume into the ecosystem.
Here is what we are building next:
This is prob your best chance of 10-100x sitting there today
OMG $TORCH is pulling a $PONS, finally got into a decent runner, sick of been rugged by all the dirty muggy memes, send the cunt!
I found out about this through @TheGemHunters community 👇
t.me/TheGemHuntersTG
dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x…
Topped up my $SWC position. The fastest horse is back and it’s only going to keep building pace.
So I decided I needed - MORE.
Greg with some nice $qnt alpha
If you're wondering why $QNT price pumped 3x this week, this list is probably a good place to start ↓↓
• Quant was just chosen to build the next generation of US bank money. The Clearing House, owned by 25 major US banks like Chase, Bank of America, HSBC, and Citi settle more than $2 trillion per day and selected Quant to connect its new on-chain money network.
• Quant is now powering the largest banks in the UK. Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, Santander and others are now executing live customer transactions on infrastructure built by Quant.
• Quant is directly integrated into Murex’s MX.3 platform. MX.3 is the financial software engine powering 65 of the world's 100 largest banks, and Quant gives them crypto-ready infrastructure without requiring them to rewrite existing infrastructure.
• Oracle has put Quant inside its enterprise digital-asset stack. One of the world's largest enterprise software companies has certified Overledger to provide cross-ledger orchestration for settling transactions across different ledgers and off-chain databases.
• Quant is shaping the standards that will govern value movement across the internet. SATP is designed to let digital assets move safely between separate networks, and the protocol is now in the IETF's final community-review stage before a decision on publication.
• Quant has built technology for the Bank for International Settlements and the Bank of England. Project Rosalind tested 33 API functions and 30+ real-world use cases, with Quant supplying blockchain infrastructure, smart contracts and interoperability.
• The European Central Bank picked Quant to help experiment with the Digital Euro. Quant is testing how programmable payments could work directly with central-bank digital money, putting it inside one of Europe’s most important future payments projects.
• Quant has already integrated with Nexi’s European payments infrastructure. The underlying SIA network spans 580 nodes across 208,000+ km of fiber, connecting banks, payment providers, and financial institutions across Europe.
• Quant has been working on blockchain infrastructure spanning 12 countries across Latin America. The LACChain network gives Quant exposure to cross-border payments, tokenized money and interoperability across multiple national markets.
• Quant has a direct route into Japan’s banking system through Dentsu Soken. Dentsu Soken builds mission-critical systems tied to BOJNET, SWIFT, CLS, internet banking, and core banking, and the partnership includes a joint go-to-market plan for Japanese banks.
• Quant has been granted multiple patents across the US, Europe, Japan, and China. This gives Quant a defensible IP position in one of the hardest problems in digital finance — enterprise-grade multi-ledger technology.
• Quant’s founder helped launch the ISO standard for blockchain and distributed ledger technology. Gilbert Verdian was instrumental in establishing ISO/TC 307, the international committee for blockchain and distributed ledger standards, going on to lead its interoperability working group.
• Quant isn't betting the company on just one product. Overledger, Quant Flow, PayScript, QuantNet, and Fusion give it multiple products around interoperability, programmable money, payments, and multi-network settlement.
• Gilbert was working on this problem before most people had even heard the word “interoperability.” Before Quant, he spent 20+ years in cybersecurity and senior technology roles across the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, HM Treasury, Mastercard, PricewaterhouseCoopers, HSBC, Ernst & Young, and other major institutions.
• $QNT is unusually scarce for an asset servicing a global market. Its maximum supply is just 14.88 million tokens, giving it one of the tightest supply profiles in large-cap crypto. As we've seen this week, when demand spikes, upward moves can be violent.
• Staking could create an even more powerful supply-and-demand loop. Likely arriving in 2027, Quant's staking mechanism could see millions of $QNT tokens locked away, while participants earn rewards and growing network usage competes for the same fixed supply.
• All of this is only what we're allowed to see. Quant is built to operate behind the scenes as white-label infrastructure; we actually have no idea how many more integrations are already live, being tested, or sitting in the pipeline waiting to be announced.
So when people ask me why $QNT suddenly ran this hard this week, I think they're asking the wrong question.
The better question is why the market ignored all of this evidence for so long.



























