dn 𖡎 retweeted
🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING NEWS!!!
PRABOWO HARUS BERTANGGUNG JAWAB ATAS HANCURNYA HUTAN PAPUA!!!
HUTAN PAPUA DIBAKAR DEMI PROYEK AMBISI PRABOWO!!!
Pembakaran hutan secara masif terjadi di lokasi proyek PSN tebu dan bioetanol di Kampung Jagebob, Merauke, yang melibatkan PT Global Papua Abadi dan PT Murni Nusantara Mandiri, perusahaan yang dikaitkan dengan keluarga Fangiono.
Prabowo adalah pihak yang berada di balik kebijakan percepatan PSN di Merauke. Proyek yang menjadi bagian dari ambisi swasembada pangan dan energi ini terus didorong di bawah kepemimpinannya. Artinya, keputusan politik Prabowo ikut membuka jalan bagi proyek yang kini menimbulkan ancaman serius terhadap hutan Papua.
Kayu hasil penggusuran dibakar dalam skala besar hingga api dilaporkan merembet ke hutan produktif.
#INDONESIASADAR
@prabowo @Gerindra @kemenhut_ri
dn 𖡎 retweeted
“After designing a structure in which a subsidiary’s CEO cannot give approval without the approval of the parent company’s CEO, HYBE has now distributed a statement attempting to shift responsibility by creating someone to blame. This is essentially HYBE spitting in its own face”
[Exclusive] “Here We Go Again with the ‘Everything Is Min Hee-jin’s Doing’ Narrative… Were You Trying to Praise Min Hee-jin?” Min Hee-jin Pushes Back Against Claims Over NewJeans’ Contract
m.entertain.naver.com/home/a…
- Min Hee-jin’s side disputes HYBE’s claim that she was the driving force behind the contracts.
- “The initial draft of the contract was prepared by HYBE’s Legal Team.”
Sports Kyunghyang, Reporter Lee Sun-myeong
Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin’s side has directly challenged HYBE over responsibility for NewJeans’ exclusive contracts.
On November 6, Min Hee-jin’s side released a statement saying, “HYBE, it is time to move beyond this absurd ‘Everything Is Min Hee-jin’s Doing’ narrative and demonstrate accountability and a willingness to improve for the future of K-pop.”
The statement was issued in response to HYBE’s rebuttal of a New York Times (NYT) report about NewJeans’ exclusive contracts. HYBE had argued that Min, rather than the company, was the party responsible for the contracts.
Min Hee-jin’s side said, “HYBE claims that there was nothing wrong with the terms of NewJeans’ exclusive contracts, while simultaneously asserting that Min Hee-jin was the party behind all of these contracts. We have to ask whether HYBE released such a lengthy explanatory statement simply because it wanted to praise Min Hee-jin.”
Her side maintains that HYBE was the party that drafted the contracts.
“The initial draft of NewJeans’ exclusive contract was prepared by HYBE’s Legal Team,” the statement said.
It explained that ADOR did not have an independent legal team at the time and that the contracts could not be finalized solely through the approval of ADOR’s CEO. They required agreement from HYBE’s Legal Team, Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). They also needed approval from ADOR’s board of directors, where two of the three inside directors were HYBE representatives.
Min Hee-jin’s side also disclosed a message that ADOR’s then-vice president had sent to one of the members’ parents.
The message read: “This is because HYBE is involved in the final decision-making process. However, since Min Hee-jin is the CEO, please trust ADOR, which she leads, and its staff, and leave things in their hands.”
Her side also brought up events from 2024. In January of that year, Min Hee-jin requested that Park Ji-won, then HYBE CEO, grant her authority to execute important contracts, including exclusive artist contracts.
Min Hee-jin’s side questioned HYBE’s position, saying, “If ADOR had sufficient authority to independently determine and execute the key terms of exclusive contracts, why would its CEO have needed to separately request that authority from the parent company?”
HYBE had previously claimed that the contract wording was finalized through discussions involving Min Hee-jin, the vice president she had appointed, the members and their parents, among others. HYBE also claimed that the then-vice president had rejected proposals intended to reduce the artists’ financial burden.
In response, Min Hee-jin’s side countered that it was ADOR’s decision not to make the members bear training-related expenses from their trainee days.
Finally, Min Hee-jin’s side stated:
“After designing a structure in which a subsidiary’s CEO cannot give approval without the approval of the parent company’s CEO, HYBE has now distributed a statement attempting to shift responsibility by creating someone to blame. This is essentially HYBE spitting in its own face.”
dn 𖡎 retweeted
GUYS, TOLONG BANTU UP‼️
Hari ini, Women’s March Jakarta menggelar aksi unjuk rasa. Ada sembilan tuntutan yang akan disuarakan. Dimulai dari keadilan ekonomi, perlindungan hak perempuan, HAM hingga keadilan lingkungan ✊🏻
#INDONESIASADAR
dn 𖡎 retweeted
Lady Justice ditutup matanya agar keadilan tidak dipengaruhi oleh simpati. Barangkali kita perlu belajar untuk tidak membiarkan rasa iba mengaburkan penilaian.
dn 𖡎 retweeted
앙딱정해줄게
• 계약서 하이브 법무팀에서 만들었음
• 그당시 어도어 사내이사3명 민희진, 이경준(하이브CFO), 이창우(하이브 기업전략실장) 중 두명이 하이브사람이라 민희진한테 결정권이 없었음
• 뉴진스 부모님이 계약서 수정 요청했었고 부대표가 최종결정과정은 하이브측에있어서 어렵다고 민희진과 스탶들 믿고 맡겨달라고 함 (설마 쫒아낼줄몰랐으니까
• 민대표측은 계약체결권한 요구 했었고 거절당함
• 이후 억배임 프레임씌워져서 민희진, 구도어스탶들 쫒겨나고 하이브가 어도어 먹음
[Exclusive] “Here We Go Again with the ‘Everything Is Min Hee-jin’s Doing’ Narrative… Were You Trying to Praise Min Hee-jin?” Min Hee-jin Pushes Back Against Claims Over NewJeans’ Contract
m.entertain.naver.com/home/a…
- Min Hee-jin’s side disputes HYBE’s claim that she was the driving force behind the contracts.
- “The initial draft of the contract was prepared by HYBE’s Legal Team.”
Sports Kyunghyang, Reporter Lee Sun-myeong
Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin’s side has directly challenged HYBE over responsibility for NewJeans’ exclusive contracts.
On November 6, Min Hee-jin’s side released a statement saying, “HYBE, it is time to move beyond this absurd ‘Everything Is Min Hee-jin’s Doing’ narrative and demonstrate accountability and a willingness to improve for the future of K-pop.”
The statement was issued in response to HYBE’s rebuttal of a New York Times (NYT) report about NewJeans’ exclusive contracts. HYBE had argued that Min, rather than the company, was the party responsible for the contracts.
Min Hee-jin’s side said, “HYBE claims that there was nothing wrong with the terms of NewJeans’ exclusive contracts, while simultaneously asserting that Min Hee-jin was the party behind all of these contracts. We have to ask whether HYBE released such a lengthy explanatory statement simply because it wanted to praise Min Hee-jin.”
Her side maintains that HYBE was the party that drafted the contracts.
“The initial draft of NewJeans’ exclusive contract was prepared by HYBE’s Legal Team,” the statement said.
It explained that ADOR did not have an independent legal team at the time and that the contracts could not be finalized solely through the approval of ADOR’s CEO. They required agreement from HYBE’s Legal Team, Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). They also needed approval from ADOR’s board of directors, where two of the three inside directors were HYBE representatives.
Min Hee-jin’s side also disclosed a message that ADOR’s then-vice president had sent to one of the members’ parents.
The message read: “This is because HYBE is involved in the final decision-making process. However, since Min Hee-jin is the CEO, please trust ADOR, which she leads, and its staff, and leave things in their hands.”
Her side also brought up events from 2024. In January of that year, Min Hee-jin requested that Park Ji-won, then HYBE CEO, grant her authority to execute important contracts, including exclusive artist contracts.
Min Hee-jin’s side questioned HYBE’s position, saying, “If ADOR had sufficient authority to independently determine and execute the key terms of exclusive contracts, why would its CEO have needed to separately request that authority from the parent company?”
HYBE had previously claimed that the contract wording was finalized through discussions involving Min Hee-jin, the vice president she had appointed, the members and their parents, among others. HYBE also claimed that the then-vice president had rejected proposals intended to reduce the artists’ financial burden.
In response, Min Hee-jin’s side countered that it was ADOR’s decision not to make the members bear training-related expenses from their trainee days.
Finally, Min Hee-jin’s side stated:
“After designing a structure in which a subsidiary’s CEO cannot give approval without the approval of the parent company’s CEO, HYBE has now distributed a statement attempting to shift responsibility by creating someone to blame. This is essentially HYBE spitting in its own face.”
dn 𖡎 retweeted
Hybe: “Contracts and litigation materials held only by the parties involved have been leaked to foreign media and are being used as tools to attack K-pop”
If criticizing the inhumane conditions of NJ's contract is an attack on K-pop, then it deserves to be attacked
dn 𖡎 retweeted
뉴욕타임스가 입수한 뉴진스 전속계약서 쟁점 정리
- 멤버들이 14~17세에 서명한 계약서에서 정부 표준계약서의 아동 보호 조항이 빠져 있었다는 보도 (NYT, 2026.11.5)
-
1. 사건 흐름
(1) 2022년 초
계약 서명 (당시 멤버들은 14~17세)
(2) 2024년 10월
하니 국회 증언
(3) 2024년
기자회견 열고 계약 해지 선언
(4) 2025년 3월
법원이 어도어 손 들어줌
(5) 2025년 12월
어도어가 다니엘과 계약 해지하고 약 2,200만 달러 소송
(6) 계약은 2029년까지,
1년 넘게 활동 없음
-
2. NYT가 제기한 의문 쟁점
① 아동 보호 조항 삭제
표준계약서에 있는 건강권·학습권·수면권·휴식권 보장, 과도한 노동 금지 문구가 뉴진스 계약서에는 없었다.
측근들은 새벽 2시까지 연습하는 일이 드물지 않았고 5명 중 4명이 학업을 그만뒀다고 증언했음.
(하이브 왈 : 아동보호법 준수, 학업 중단 강요 없음)
② 모호한 품행 조항
'불성실한 태도', '자기관리 소홀', '부적절한 이성 교제'를 금지했음.
회사 명예를 해치는 발언은 사실이든 허위든 금지했음.
전문가들은 회사가 '계약 위반'을 주장할 여지가 넓다고 지적함.
③ 위약벌 구조
회사가 계약을 끝내도 위약벌을 청구할 수 있음.
표준계약서는 전체 개월로 낸 월평균에 남은 개월 수를 곱하는 방식으로 산정함.
뉴진스 계약서에서는 '매출이 있던 달만'으로 평균을 내서 위약벌이 부풀 수 있다는 지적이 나옴.
* 다니엘 청구액은 약 2,200만 달러.
(하이브 왈 : 업계 표준이고, 실제로 금액이 늘지 않음)
④ 얼굴·목소리·AI 권리
표준계약서는 계약이 끝나면 초상·음성 사용권이 바로 소멸함.
뉴진스 계약은 2029년 이후에도 회사가 계속 쓰고 라이선스할 수 있고, AI 음성 복제와 챗봇도 포함됨.
계약이 끝난 뒤 음원 재가공·판매도 가능하며, 멤버 몫은 줄어들게 되어있음.
⑤ 비용과 협상력
연습생 시절 성형·미용 비용의 상당 부분을 멤버가 갚도록 함.
한 멤버 어머니가 서명 전에 수정을 요청하자, 어도어 부사장은 "동의하지 않으면 계약 자체를 재고하라"고 답함.
결국 부모 전원이 서명함.
-
3. 양측 입장
하이브 측 >>
계약은 합법이고 신의성실하게 협상했으며, 표준계약서는 권고일 뿐이고 성형 강요도 없었다는 입장.
비판 측 (노종언 변호사) >>
최근 대형사 계약에서도 보기 드문 수준의 자유 제한
계약이 끝난 뒤의 초상·AI 조항이 법정에서 어디까지 인정될지는 불분명함.
-
출처: The New York Times
dn 𖡎 retweeted
I see people saying, "But MHJ was the CEO. She was the one who allowed this to happen."
Allowed what to happen, exactly?
The contract? That was a standard idol contract drafted by HYBE for its labels. It wasn't some special contract that MHJ independently created for NewJeans. The girls were essentially presented with the standard terms: sign the contract if you want to pursue an idol career under that system, or don't.
But I think there's a much bigger question people keep overlooking: What was the actual working and living environment of the girls when MHJ was the CEO of ADOR?
NewJeans was successful in every sense of the word. The girls were paid well. They had proper accommodations. They weren't pushed into exhausting schedules. They were given time to go home, spend time with their families, study, travel and experience life outside of "idol" work. They were allowed to grow up while pursuing their dreams, rather than having every waking moment revolve around being idols.
More importantly, they were surrounded by people who genuinely cared about them, looked after them and created an environment where they could enjoy what they were doing. They were given room to develop not just as artists, but as young people.
Remember how K-pop stans used to call them spoiled because of how well OG ADOR treated them? How people would point out how differently they were managed compared to other idols?
That didn't happen by accident. It was part of the environment OG ADOR built for them.
Now, does that mean the original contract was okay? No. Does it mean MHJ was personally responsible for every contractual provision or that OG ADOR had no management shortcomings? Also no. Those are separate questions that deserve to be examined on their own merits.
But if we're going to discuss MHJ's responsibility as CEO, then we should look at the actual conditions she helped create, not just reduce the entire discussion to the fact that she was CEO when the girls signed a standard HYBE contract.
You cannot ignore the lived experience of the girls under OG ADOR and then pretend that the only thing that matters is the piece of paper they signed.
A contract defines the legal relationship. But the environment in which the artists actually work, grow and live also matters. And that is precisely what made OG ADOR different.
dn 𖡎 retweeted
u segitu marahnya ke anak njz krn deket sama boss nya. tapi mana energi yang sama buat idol idol hybe yang foto bareng bsh, masih say thank you when he literally criminal under investigation for fraud? dan boss yg sering keciduk bareng ani ani apa ga jijik lu pada
