생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp) header
생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp) profile picture

“세상은, 자연은, 우리는 연결되어 있다” 📚건전한 담론을 위한 지식교양서

Joined January 2021
Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)Photo by 생각의힘 출판사 (@books_tp)
화요일 결과에 대한 최악의 대응은 민주당이 그들의 월계관에 안주하는 것입니다. 힘든 일은 이제 시작됩니다.
The historic Democratic victory in the midterms is a lifeline for US democracy. It would be a mistake to minimize the importance of Democrats taking control of the House and the Senate and doing so resoundingly. Yet it would also be a huge mistake to fail to recognize that the toughest part starts now. Senator Jon Ossoff stated in his victory speech: “we must acknowledge that the underlying crisis gripping our republic remains and that therefore our most vital work lies ahead.” But even this frank assessment understates the severity of the challenge facing the party. Tuesday’s outcome was an anti-Trump vote. But it was delivered by the same frustrated voters that brought Trump to power and gave both houses to Republicans in 2024 in an anti-Biden vote. If Democrats cannot grapple with the obscene levels of inequality in this country, with the real affordability crisis and with the vexing problem of creating good jobs for Americans of all skills, the pendulum could swing back in 2028. Democrats need a platform that is at once realistic andradical to tackle the tremendous economic challenges for workers. Neither progressive Democrats’ reliance on taxes, transfers and traditional regulations, nor centrists’ attachment to the status quo, nor the wishful thinking of those banking on AI-driven “abundance” is radical enough. The inequality, affordability and jobs problems facing Americans will only get worse in the coming AI economy. Democrats need to articulate new aspirations and a new governing philosophy, as I have argued in my book What Happened to Liberal Democracy. penguinrandomhouse.com/books… These have to be centered on creating well-paid, career-building jobs for all workers, and especially those without a college degree, who have been left behind in the postindustrial economy of the last half century. This agenda must start with a workable plan for redirecting AI, so that this promising technology isn’t shaped by the dreams of a small cadre intent on artificial superintelligence and automation of most of what humans do. We must instead articulate why it is feasible and desirable to build pro-worker AI and how this can create jobs and decent incomes for workers. We must also propose policies to help a new pro-worker AI economy (and some of the elements of such a policy are outlined in this piece: nature.com/articles/d41586-0… more details can be found here: brookings.edu/articles/build…). This effort must be accompanied by a broad enough Democratic tent that recognizes the cultural as well as economic discontent of working-class communities. The worst response to Tuesday’s results would be for Democrats to rest on their laurels. The hard work starts now.
1
43
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
The historic Democratic victory in the midterms is a lifeline for US democracy. It would be a mistake to minimize the importance of Democrats taking control of the House and the Senate and doing so resoundingly. Yet it would also be a huge mistake to fail to recognize that the toughest part starts now. Senator Jon Ossoff stated in his victory speech: “we must acknowledge that the underlying crisis gripping our republic remains and that therefore our most vital work lies ahead.” But even this frank assessment understates the severity of the challenge facing the party. Tuesday’s outcome was an anti-Trump vote. But it was delivered by the same frustrated voters that brought Trump to power and gave both houses to Republicans in 2024 in an anti-Biden vote. If Democrats cannot grapple with the obscene levels of inequality in this country, with the real affordability crisis and with the vexing problem of creating good jobs for Americans of all skills, the pendulum could swing back in 2028. Democrats need a platform that is at once realistic andradical to tackle the tremendous economic challenges for workers. Neither progressive Democrats’ reliance on taxes, transfers and traditional regulations, nor centrists’ attachment to the status quo, nor the wishful thinking of those banking on AI-driven “abundance” is radical enough. The inequality, affordability and jobs problems facing Americans will only get worse in the coming AI economy. Democrats need to articulate new aspirations and a new governing philosophy, as I have argued in my book What Happened to Liberal Democracy. penguinrandomhouse.com/books… These have to be centered on creating well-paid, career-building jobs for all workers, and especially those without a college degree, who have been left behind in the postindustrial economy of the last half century. This agenda must start with a workable plan for redirecting AI, so that this promising technology isn’t shaped by the dreams of a small cadre intent on artificial superintelligence and automation of most of what humans do. We must instead articulate why it is feasible and desirable to build pro-worker AI and how this can create jobs and decent incomes for workers. We must also propose policies to help a new pro-worker AI economy (and some of the elements of such a policy are outlined in this piece: nature.com/articles/d41586-0… more details can be found here: brookings.edu/articles/build…). This effort must be accompanied by a broad enough Democratic tent that recognizes the cultural as well as economic discontent of working-class communities. The worst response to Tuesday’s results would be for Democrats to rest on their laurels. The hard work starts now.
25
255
29
1,001
69,050
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
괴츠 알리의 [히틀러의 복지국가 : 약탈, 인종 학살, 공범들] 완독 후기 *한 줄 평 : 번영의 환상 뒤에 감쳐진, 착취와 학살의 그림자 독일 국민들이 히틀러와 나치에 순응할 수 있었던 요인들을, '사회경제적'인 시선에서 해석한 걸작이라고 생각합니다.
1
3
99
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
전국의 상처받은 직장인 선생님들을 위해 〈사표 접기〉를 무료 배포합니다.기분이라도 냅시다..화요팅
2
7
1
35
89,640
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
China is moving ahead on the Arctic trade route. Talking Trump and chokepoints on @CNN with my longtime colleague @FareedZakaria for Sea Change: America's new Great Game in the Arctic Circle prh.com/seachange:
8
12
949
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
So happy to have the opportunity to talk about why ships are the new chips, and maritime capacity matters in this @nytopinion essay adapted from my new book Sea Change nytimes.com/2026/10/07/opini…
3
20
4
57
6,675
《AI 제국》 그믐에서 함께 읽기 합니다. 오늘까지 신청받는답니다. gmeum.com/gather/detail/3980
1
1
202
소개 문구입니다. 미국의 저널리스트 카렌 하오의 《AI 제국》입니다. 작년(2025년)에 가장 좋았던 인공지능(AI)을 다룬 책이 장강명 작가의 『먼저 온 미래』였다면, 올해는 《AI 제국》이었습니다. 지금 AI를 둘러싸고 제기되는 거의 모든 질문이 이 책에서 먼저 사려 깊게 다뤄지고 있습니다.
1
102
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
I am very much looking forward to discussing What Happened to Liberal Democracy? with Michael Sandel on September 24 at MIT
On September 24 from 12-1 PM ET, join us for a fireside chat with @DAcemogluMIT and Michael Sandel on the themes of "What Happened to Liberal Democracy?" This event is co-hosted by the Stone Center and the Leadership Now Project at @MITSloan. Link to register below 👇
6
64
4
428
43,335
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Dear followers, I’m delighted to share this BBC interview BBC World Service - The Interview, Daron Acemoglu, Economist: Liberal democracy is in crisis bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3ct98h…
6
202
11
1,161
75,844
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Destruction of East India Company Gives US Lawmakers a Blueprint for Confronting Big Tech. The instruments to take apart entrenched corporate power “still exist,” but current governments are “lacking... the political nerve to use them,” said historian William Dalrymple commondreams.org/news/break-…
20
438
15
1,049
41,582
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
An essay I've just written for @nytimes on why Big Tech is the 21st Century’s equivalent of the East India Company: "What It Would Take to Dismantle the Most Powerful Companies in the World" nytimes.com/2026/08/28/opini…
91
1,213
79
3,217
742,696
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
In fact, in many areas where technooptimists argue that AI is going to revolutionize everything, the impact may be much less positive because current approaches are not helping us get to the bottom of mechanisms of human cognition, discovery, and innovation. In many of them, we need more and higher quality data to make further advance, and what makes AI very competent in coding and writing doesn’t generalize. Worse, in a few of them, AI enthusiasm may push research and investment in the wrong direction.
48
183
11
949
82,465
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
Dear followers This is a truly brilliant article by Henry Farrell. Not because it defends me against the Economist (I have moved on). It’s the way Farrell frames and analyzes the issues surrounding technooptimism and AI. The Acemoglu Wars Are All About AI. programmablemutter.com/p/the…
29
432
32
1,931
185,693
생각의힘 출판사 retweeted
One of the upshots of the Economist’s attack on Daron Acemoglu is that the key dividing line is not about methodology. You can literally be the most decorated mainstream economist but if you land on the “wrong” side, you are ousted. The key dividing line is whose side you are on: workers or big business.
26
221
27
950
102,478
아세모글루는 포스트 케인스주의, 심지어 마르크스주의 경제학과 매우 유사한 결론에 도달했지만, 그 결론에 이르는 과정에서는 전혀 다른 개념과 방법론을 사용했다. 주류 경제학자들은 그의 기술적 능력이나 학문적 엄밀성을 문제 삼을 수 없다. 그것은 이미 충분히 입증되어 있기 때문이다.
2
3
245