I'm sort of expecting this behavior, but guys, at least remove the pin, I dunno.
You have:
> Claude Ultracode is super intelligence
aka
> Coding is solved
as the pin.
And then next post:
> 20-year devs can't find work anymore
Do you not realize you're part of the problem?
I had these exact same thoughts do you think why?
Because of AI brainwashing on social media and shitton of bots that want to make you believe that you don't have to read code anymore.
People that have been inspiring me since early 2010s, they all turned to this AI psychosis narrative, and most of my 2026 I spent in anxiety over what do I actually do as Engineer, if people I trusted for many years are now telling me I should forget everything I learned?
That's where you come into the picture, other people that I started following in a hope that there is still sense left among real Engineers, and I thought well, this guy almost certainly is on the side of critical thinkers.
And then when you did the flip-flop, are you still not realizing this move made some people suicidal?
You simply mentioned "Latest model can code, I can't argue with that, they're getting technical so we need to find something else to hate."
That's exactly the opposite of why someone like me would follow you. We want to see details, we have to disassemble their marketing bullshit and yet you just gave up. So why should those poor souls not give up then? You have to do better, man. You have the power of distribution, the power of spreading the word. And yet you use it to say bullshit like a new model is "ultra intelligence".
Thanks for your service, I guess☺️🪦
Every time I have to deal with Markdown formatting in my blog.
Every. Single. Time.
You are (not) common.
Or should I wait 60k PLN price point?
This will be my trigger to sell it, I don't believe I can afford $15k worth of hardware just sitting there while being unemployed.
I mean, even at $10k this is genuinely tempting amount of "fuckoff" money for me that will let me sustain for at least 3 more months in this economy.
Sir, this isn’t the game, these are real life events and South Korea just suffered from massive airstrike from DPRK.
The operator is dead 🪦🫠
You can’t add a hashtag and call it a game when people are dying 🫠
Actor model / Erlang / Elixir is like
“Look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power💪”
🔥✍️
Kitesurf is a browser that runs inside a @Cloudflare Worker. No Chromium, no container. @mattzcarey demoed an agent driving it live at init().
If you really don't have time to listen through entire talk, this is the meat of it.
You can find slides and transcript: github.com/matthiasn/talk-tr…
We can use AI to improve understanding of the thing we're developing.
For example, why learn entire ALSA stack through documentation and trying to understand code the hardcore way, if we can do this first:
> use HTML to visualize what is going on at the level of detail we're interested in
and then we can also add this: usecoherence.dev/blog/2026-0… to measure how much complexity in that ALSA request chain, and what takes most cognitive effort to understand.
Software engineering is massively about managing complexity, but the best Engineers are able to reduce complexity, delete code, make it simple to understand, hide deep complexity behind a simple public interface.
This is called complexity leverage.
Your Linux I/O is only 5 methods: open, seek, read, write, close.
A ton of flags, yes.
But the interface is simple to use, easy to understand.
If you need those extra features, then you dive through flags documentation.
But opening file, writing a string to it, and closing can be done in plain C in 10 minutes, and it is the first thing they teach you in Computer Science: printing strings to display, and manipulating files.
Now, you are empowered to modify reality, to interact with your SSD, HDD, flash drives, sockets, RAM.
Just by spending 10 minutes learning how those basic functions work, you empower yourself to understand pretty much entire Linux ecosystem: everything is a file.
Network: write(socket_fd, "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n", 18);
Reading CPU: open("/proc/cpuinfo", O_RDONLY);
Mouse: open("/dev/input/mice", O_RDONLY);
IPC (inter-process comm):
# int fd = open("/tmp/my_pipe", O_WRONLY);
# write(fd, "Hello Process B!", 16);
10 minutes and you can understand how to program Linux. That's the power of complexity leverage, abstraction.
But how can we achieve this level of abstraction?
That's the trick. We need enough understanding around problem to see simple interface around it.
Cognitive effort prevents us to understand world quickly, and delays efficient, tiny programs similar to Linux I/O.
Compressing complexity into an interface everyone can understand in 10 minutes and use is the highest possible art form.
We must never lose the art of making things easy to understand, and simple to use.
I also suggest watching Mr. Hickey on this matter
youtube.com/watch?v=SxdOUGds…
It's so easy to understand☺️
It is pretty normal stuff, people change their names all the time and switch jobs and countries and degrees, LinkedIn cant keep up ☺️
I switched two countries in just one year, but I realize I could do like 5 easily if I really wanted.
Also r/overemployed is a proof!
See, you just need to git gud to get hired in this economy💪
I believe in you.
The only limitation is your imagination.
…
…
…
…
…
/s ☺️
when people with "investor" bio follow me, I think I might be a founder, but then I remember I'm somewhat of an investor myself
today I invested into McDonalds: fries, big mac and a drink
that was ~$15
I think it was good investment
we'll see how it goes tomorrow, whether it will clog the toilet again or not
I'm somewhat bullish about it
follow me for more signals 😎
Can I reverse engineer capitalism and make my own version without these pesky bugs like evil mega corporations and unemployment?🤔
> proceeds to show exactly the bottleneck — understanding changes behind the PR, by asking LLM to explain changes, but not showing what follows next after LLM responds “sure, here’s what you need to understand …”
You can’t make this stuff up ☺️
@CryptoCyberia hope you like this one xitter.cf/br11k_dev/status/21061…
Serial Experiments Lain — “Inner Vision” by Nakaido “Chabo” Reichi.
I've split original recording into stems, replaced the guitar one. All rights to the original music and recording belong to their respective owners.
(youtube.com/watch?v=qiayQM5K…)
DEMO arrangement (planning to replace piano and drums, sounds in the background, re-record guitar maybe).
Equipment:
- Fender Stratocaster HSS w/Floyd Rose Original (manufactured 1993)
- AMT SS-11B (clean channel)
- AMT Pangaea ULTIMA U-2
- AT-2020 mic
- Behringer UMC404HD
- Arch Linux VM with USB passthrough🤣
- Bitwig Studio Producer license
Older stuff you can find on br11k.bandcamp.com/
Original one is played on acoustic but I didn't have it, so I recorded a bit of mic and mixed it into the processed clean channel.
this is why hiring is so broken guys
nobody knows how to evaluate problem solving skills
Imagine interviewing taxi driver by making them solve abstract leetcode style questions "explain how transmission works when you go through gravel, and now make it also -80F outside, can you solve this using log(N) amount of fuel?"
a better interview is giving them a car, a passenger and looking at how they navigate the obstacle course without making passenger sick
and even better interview is actually giving them a real passenger and real location where they need to be delivered and then looking at the outcome: did passenger survive? did car survive? how much time it took to drive from A to B? and so on
It's like if I start asking taxi driver "did you use Nike boots to press on gas pedal?"
"sorry we need more experience on stepping the gas pedal using Nike boots"
☺️☺️☺️
























