Committed to supporting mystical, philosophical, and historically grounded Islam and engaging in informed interfaith discussions.
Joined January 2022
- Tweets4.6K
- Following317
- Followers8.6K
- Likes1.4K
Pinned Tweet
Brethren of Purity:
We're a collective of followers of various schools of Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism. We've all joined together for one common purpose - to promote The Eternal Wisdom (Hikmah) and to counter a destructive force that is overtaking Islam - Wahabism/Salafism...
You can cry as much as you want about not being a Zio puppet. The truth is that you are one and that is not going to change.
DISCLAIMER
On religious grounds, and based on the teachings of the Most Sacred Fourteen Infallibles (AS), I hate Khomeini, Khamenei I, and Khamenei II. I utterly detest them. In my view, they are among the most reprehensible figures in Islamic history after Abu Bakr and Umar. In fact, I consider them to be of the same kind as Mu'awiya.
I stand firmly in opposition to Sistani and other marajiʿ and mujtahids of his kind. I have absolutely no respect for them. I deeply detest them, though not quite to the same degree as Khomeini and Khamenei—but close enough. I consider them and the religious establishment they represent to be among the greatest tragedies ever to befall Shi'a Islam.
To those Shi'a who dislike my position or cannot understand it:
Join my live shows and ask me directly why I hold these views. I will gladly explain my reasons.
Watch my extensive lectures on Wilayat al-Faqih (WF), the Iranian Revolution, and Marja'iyya, where I have explained my positions in detail.
Find scholars willing to debate me on these subjects. I welcome any serious scholarly debate and promise to remain humble, polite, and strictly evidence-based throughout the discussion.
If you are unwilling to do any of the above, then get lost. Go away. Unsubscribe from my channel. Unfollow me. I have no interest in seeking your approval or compromising my religious convictions to please you.
Much obliged.
P.S. Only a fool would interpret my condemnation of these individuals as an endorsement of Israel. My opposition to them is rooted in my religious convictions and should not be mistaken for support for Israel or its policies.
It's actually a great development that Allahyari is posting on X now. On YouTube, he has a cult following of low IQ cultic Shias who hate critical reasoning.
On X, his posts are seen by average people with functioning brains and they call out his BS instantly. Keep posting!
DISCLAIMER
On religious grounds, and based on the teachings of the Most Sacred Fourteen Infallibles (AS), I hate Khomeini, Khamenei I, and Khamenei II. I utterly detest them. In my view, they are among the most reprehensible figures in Islamic history after Abu Bakr and Umar. In fact, I consider them to be of the same kind as Mu'awiya.
I stand firmly in opposition to Sistani and other marajiʿ and mujtahids of his kind. I have absolutely no respect for them. I deeply detest them, though not quite to the same degree as Khomeini and Khamenei—but close enough. I consider them and the religious establishment they represent to be among the greatest tragedies ever to befall Shi'a Islam.
To those Shi'a who dislike my position or cannot understand it:
Join my live shows and ask me directly why I hold these views. I will gladly explain my reasons.
Watch my extensive lectures on Wilayat al-Faqih (WF), the Iranian Revolution, and Marja'iyya, where I have explained my positions in detail.
Find scholars willing to debate me on these subjects. I welcome any serious scholarly debate and promise to remain humble, polite, and strictly evidence-based throughout the discussion.
If you are unwilling to do any of the above, then get lost. Go away. Unsubscribe from my channel. Unfollow me. I have no interest in seeking your approval or compromising my religious convictions to please you.
Much obliged.
P.S. Only a fool would interpret my condemnation of these individuals as an endorsement of Israel. My opposition to them is rooted in my religious convictions and should not be mistaken for support for Israel or its policies.
It is very revealing that DH replied to nearly every suggestion on his post but avoided the most obvious and high-effort one. Why?
@Haqiqatjou why are you ignoring? Just have a discussion. It shouldn't be that hard. Right? Unless you know what you'd be walking into.
Brethren of Purity retweeted
Now I understand why philosophy and irfaan offend you, Hassan. They demand that you examine the reason behind your belief and that you also examine yourself.
You think you’re qualified to correct centuries of Islamic intellectual inquiry, but “don't call people ugly” is apparently beyond your abilities as the self-proclaimed gatekeeper to "true Tashayyu".
Irfaan teaches: when you make fun of the artwork, you're actually making fun of the artist.
Doubt any of that registered for you, in fact I'm convinced you have a capacity issue at this point.
Allama Allahyari has supposedly read more Hadiths than anyone else but can't follow even the most simple and basic ones that even children know about.
Now I understand why philosophy and irfaan offend you, Hassan. They demand that you examine the reason behind your belief and that you also examine yourself.
You think you’re qualified to correct centuries of Islamic intellectual inquiry, but “don't call people ugly” is apparently beyond your abilities as the self-proclaimed gatekeeper to "true Tashayyu".
Irfaan teaches: when you make fun of the artwork, you're actually making fun of the artist.
Doubt any of that registered for you, in fact I'm convinced you have a capacity issue at this point.
Dr. Javad Hashmi completely cooked "God Logic" who was not ready for the scholarly and academic positions that Dr. Javad presented. This is what happens when low class polemicists face someone who actually studied the subject.
We'll be live with @Acts17David reviewing @GodLogic_GL 's debate before it goes public. Tune in to get a sneak peek of what happened:
youtube.com/watch?v=cu9jpdba…
Bro literally thinks he's the thing and everyone, including PhD Professors like @KhalilAndani, should call his live show as if seeking advice from Dave Ramsey.
Go touch grass and come discuss on a neutral platform like everyone does. X Spaces are great.
As soon as you lose slight monopoly, your neurodivergent self, nothing wrong with that, goes into overstimulation mode and hardly is able to even form a coherent sentence. That is exactly why you always run away from neutral platform. Let's talk on X spaces right now.
This is another trick of this trickster to give the impression that he doesn't know. Why are your minions simping constantly in our DMs if you don't know anything.
You will never have a discussion on a neutral platform. That's established.
This is what Allahyari does. He uses these Facebook and Whatsapp minions to arrange discussions so that he can use plausible deniability later and say: Oh, I didn't know about it.
It's simple. If you have guts, join an X space made by any neutral account.
Oh, what a spectacular piece of fiction! Apparently, I challenged their little man "Ustadh" Hasnain, he demanded a neutral platform, and I ran away in terror!
There's just one embarrassing little problem with your fairy tale: I have absolutely no recollection of any such exchange.
But perhaps your extraordinary imagination has access to conversations that never took place!
So, genius, where is my challenge? Where is his response? Surely, someone with such remarkable confidence in his own nonsense can produce a shred of evidence?
And your second allegation is even more laughable. I have repeatedly debated opponents on their own platforms. Yet this intellectual heavyweight wants us to believe I'm terrified of a neutral platform!
Next time, try engaging your brain before embarrassing yourself in public.
Like always, nonetheless, I'm eager to expose the fraud of "Islamic philosophy" and "Islamic mysticism." Would love to engage your little "ustadh" Hasnanin.
And after spending 30 years studying, you can't even produce a simple argument for the existence of God.
When you can't deal with ideas, you start obsessing over language. Average low intellect behavior.
This sheikh is saying that despite spending 15 years in Najaf al-Ashraf, Khomeini learned only one phrase in Arabic and he was unable to speak anything else in the language.
That phrase was “Fuloos makoo” (فلوس ماكو), an Iraqi Arabic expression meaning “There’s no money.”
Whenever people approached Khomeini seeking financial assistance or a loan, he would turn them away with those two words: “Fuloos makoo!”
Poorly translating a book doesn't mean you understand it. Allahyari, for his life, can't explain Amuli's argument. There's a reason he runs away from any neutral platform discussion. He only feels safe when he can bully.
It is clear that DH has replied to everyone but has not replied to Hadi. It looks like DH is primarily interested in discussing with Shias who hold to the more basic form of religion and is not really interested in discussing Shia philosophy or esotericism.