
abstraction miner. few startups here and there. now applied research in ai and finance @socialprotolabs
Bay Area, CA
Joined July 2006
- Tweets14.9K
- Following4.1K
- Followers2.7K
- Likes24.4K
excited to watch this whole ai-meets-drug-discovery phenomenon unfold from the peanut gallery.
going to be amazing.
Over the past few months, Anthropic scientists have engaged in deep research partnerships with six organizations developing new medicines. We've also begun drug discovery efforts of our own.
In doing so, we’ve learned much more about how Claude can support the many stages of drug development.
In this blog post, we share some early results from these efforts, and describe how this work fits in with our wider ambitions in the life sciences.
anthropic.com/research/early…
I’m sure we’ll soon see a mashup of Genie style world generation and a Remnants-style immersive Vision Pro experience. user gets to choose just how creepy things get.
Brij Singh retweeted
The only way to make sense of the world right now
Is to understand we’re approaching the singularity
Spacetime is becoming more curved, and relative times are disturbed
chinese chili maker is ai-pilled.
claude code moment for physical ai is probably still in its early stages but it’s hard to imagine the ripple effects it could have across society.
Rumors that chili maker Lao Gan Ma laid off 500+ workers due to AI have gone viral in China.
Beneath Beijing’s positive messaging, many ordinary Chinese people are worried about AI and jobs.
Lao Gan Ma recently touted a new AI-powered chili inspection system that uses high-speed industrial cameras that significantly outperform manual inspection.
A stat about the company using this AI system to reduce human inspectors from 600 to 48 went viral on Chinese social media. The iconic, family-run company pushed back.
But if you look at the data, the company has reduced headcount from 2,912 to 740 in the past few years while earning record revenues.
Original story: m.jiemian.com/article/152425…
we live in simulation and we just don't know it
Excited to share Genie 4 today our most realistic and interactive world model:
- steer dynamic environments in real time, shaping events, camera angles, and actions
- generate native audio matched to the world, from realistic background sounds to characters who can converse in real time!
- simulate photorealistic scenes and real-world physics
- create more coherent multi-step events through reasoning from Gemini
We've started to roll out as a research preview to trusted testers. Coming soon to Google AI Ultra subscribers in Project Genie and early access partners via the Gemini API and AI Studio.
good explanation
Many of you don't understand how serious this is, so let me break it down.
In computer science there is a famous kind of puzzle called 3-SAT. You are given a long list of yes-or-no switches and a set of rules about how they must be arranged, and you have to find a combination that satisfies every rule. The obvious way to solve it is to try every combination, but each new switch doubles the number of possibilities, so a puzzle with a few hundred switches would take longer than the age of the universe to brute force.
For decades, the smartest people in the field found clever tricks that made this a little faster, but every trick still hit the same wall: the time required kept exploding as the puzzle grew.
About 25 years ago, two computer scientists, Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi, working with Francis Zane, turned that wall into a formal idea.
They proposed the Exponential Time Hypothesis, which says this explosion is not a failure of human cleverness but a law of nature. No algorithm, however brilliant, will ever solve 3-SAT without the time blowing up exponentially. Nobody could prove it, but almost everyone believed it, and it became one of the foundations of modern computer science.
Researchers used it as a measuring stick. If you could show that solving some other problem quickly would also crack 3-SAT quickly, you had shown that problem was hopelessly hard too. Hundreds of papers, across scheduling, graphs, logic and much more, rest on this one assumption.
Now an internal AI model at OpenAI claims to have broken it. It says it found an algorithm that solves these puzzles meaningfully faster than the hypothesis allows, and it has checked the proof in a computer verification system called Lean.
And here is the remarkable part: the very people who proposed the hypothesis, Impagliazzo and Paturi, along with MIT's Ryan Williams, are now leading the public review of whether a machine has disproved their own idea.
So what happens next? If the disproof holds, a large part of theoretical computer science has to be revisited.
Every result that said "this problem cannot be solved faster, assuming ETH" loses its foundation, and researchers will have to work out which of those walls were real and which were simply where we stopped looking. It does not mean everything becomes easy. The new algorithm is still slow in absolute terms and this is not the famous P versus NP problem being solved.
But it means our map of what is possible was wrong in a place we were very confident about, and it was an AI that redrew it. If the disproof fails, the hypothesis survives and the field breathes out, but we will still have watched an AI produce serious, checkable work on one of the deepest questions in the discipline, closely enough that the founders of the idea had to take it seriously. Either way, something has shifted.
anthropic in hold-my-beer mode
“The core algorithm was found on October 16 by an internal Claude research model with 14M output tokens and no human input. Anthropic researchers worked with Claude to improve the presentation, resulting in this paper.”
github.com/anthropics/formal…
what timeline we are in?
Today Physical Superintelligence PBC is announcing solutions to five long-standing problems in quantum information theory.
psi.inc/research/oqp-batch-2…
Thread 👇
Brij Singh retweeted
It is such a funny twist of fate that OpenAI, led by an ex-YC product guy, is putting out groundbreaking math/physics/cs research while Anthropic, led by a physics PhD, is primary putting out a coding product.
Announcing three major scientific discoveries, one each in mathematics (harmonic analysis), computer science (complexity theory), and physics (quantum field theory).
AI starting to help us improve our understanding of the universe! openai.com/index/building-sc…
asana's co-founder will likely make more from seed investment than all of sand hill road combined. anthropic’s fundraising journey deserves its own netflix series.
Anthropic files for IPO. But who is poised to get the 💰? My usual breakdown below 👇
Investors will be sharing nearly $1 TRILLION of proceeds on ~$142b invested. A ~6.5x blended multiple on a huge amount of capital, in just 5 years. 🤯
Note: all those numbers assume a $1.5 trillion IPO valuation.
So let’s dive in 🔎
1) The craziest fact: no VC in the Series A or Series B 🤯
The $124m Series A in May-21 was led by Jaan Tallinn (Skype’s co-founder), with Dustin Moskovitz and Eric Schmidt. It is likely to return ~345x the original capital, or ~$43b to those early angels. Mind-boggling.
The $982m Series B in 2022 was led by... SBF and FTX: it will return ~79x the capital invested. FTX’s $500m would be worth ~$39b today.
Plot twist: the estate sold it for ~$1.3b in 2024, in one of the worst trades ever.
2) The first VCs in: Spark and Menlo are killing it 🏆
Spark will make over $10b from its Anthropic investments.
They first came into the 2023 Series C and are making ~79x their investment in that round. They followed in every single round since, investing $777m in total, now worth ~$11b.
Menlo led the Jan-24 Series D and will make ~30x its money on that round. And finally, Lightspeed’s Series E lead will make ~16x in 18 months.
3) The real winners in $ terms: the strategics 💰
Amazon put a grand total of ~$18b in, mostly via convertible notes converting at ~$2 a share, against $58.90 for the Series H investors.
That gives Amazon ~21% of the company, worth ~$310b. That’s ~17x its investment. 💵
Google is not that far behind: its notes and the $10b it put in this April alone will be worth ~$83b.
And that’s before the compute: Anthropic has committed $110b+ to AWS and $111b to Google Cloud. They are both investors and suppliers, so they win twice.
4) Founders and team: incredible outcome, and giving most of it away 🙏
The seven co-founders hold ~240m shares each. That’s ~$21b per person, or ~$150b combined. 👏
And each of them has pledged 80% of it to philanthropy. So ~$120b will be going to good causes. On top of that, Anthropic put 5% of the company (~$75b) into its own Public Benefit Fund.
And the IPO will mint a huge number of UHNW in the team: they will share ~$355b worth of shares, options and RSUs. Perhaps the biggest and fastest employee wealth creation event in history.
Congrats to Dario, Daniela and everyone involved. Legendary. 👏
Replying to @KanyeWestJS @apples_jimmy
This is potentially the biggest AI science announcement of the year—and one of the largest ever. OpenAI claims AI proofs resolving Kakeya (and related conjectures) in all dimensions, falsifying the longstanding ETH in complexity theory, and establishing rigorous existence for 4D interacting QFTs including QCD plus a Standard Model completion (covering part of the Yang-Mills Millennium problem). Lean formalizations exist for the first two; top experts (including ETH proposers and Nobel winner Gross) are shepherding verification. Prior 2026 lab efforts (OpenAI’s bulk math dumps, Meta open-problem papers, DeepMind tools) were significant but smaller in foundational impact. Full human understanding and checks will take time.
asked fable to do tldr-
“AI system has produced proofs for three major open problems in math, computer science and physics, including a long-standing Millennium Prize problem and the surprising claim that a widely trusted assumption about how hard certain computing problems are is simply wrong.
The bigger story is that the hard part is no longer finding the answers but getting human experts to check and explain them, which is why OpenAI is handing the results to outside scientists and paying for conferences to make sense of them”
We are announcing three new discoveries in mathematics, computer science, and physics about harmonic analysis, complexity theory, and quantum field theory.
openai.com/index/building-sc…
high number is concerning. even the best run companies seem to have decided they can’t retrain their staff for ai-native workflows so they’re scaling back instead.
google, amazon, meta (once again) and many others may follow suit.
Microsoft offers buyouts to 60,000 employees. This latest exit offer is available to far more employees than the previous retirement one, and comes just months after Microsoft laid off 4,800 employees. Full details here 👇theverge.com/tech/1018666/mi…
108,000+ tokens/sec 🤯
Speeding up Gemma!
Gemini 4 Argon enabled a 2.85x speedup on an A100 via vLLM, jumping from ~37,900 to 108,000+ tokens/sec on gemma-4-E2B-it.
✅ 100% token parity
✅ Zero quality drop
✅ Done in days, not months
See the exact changes across 8 PRs: goo.gle/4zNtANl
stunning NRR suggests we are in the "ai lifts all boats" phase. market is moving up and to the right and everyone wins in the short term. mr jevons winning.
Three metrics that set the bar high:
- 900% Quarterly NRR (usage based)
- $6M Revenue / FTE
- Power users 20x usage to avg sub
Takeaways for Enterprise AI:
- Shift to verifiable agent work, priced per task / outcome / verified result
- AI-native companies building w/ agents get extreme operating efficiency
- Market is so competitive ANT can’t even forecast its own revenue / growth with confidence!
- Enterprises can’t predict spend, will favor predictable, committed contracts
staff eventually hit “fool me twice, shame on me” phase
Never seen such dismay: Why a 36-year market veteran is warning India msn.com/en-in/money/economy/…






















