C-Fifth

So many things I want to tweet about this that would get me banned. No one has ever deserved it more than Tarrio.

It's an annoying waste of time because I know the Trump fanatics don't actually care about any of the underlying facts about any of the things they cite. When you say "this person did something illegal, it should be prosecuted!" here are some important things to keep in mind: 1. What are the facts surrounding what the accused party actually did? 2. Who has jurisdiction to prosecute their crimes? 3. What specific crimes did they commit? 4. What is their legal defense for said crimes? 5. WHY did they commit the crimes they're accused of committing? If you haven't done even the basic research on these 5 things, your criticisms should probably end at "these people are morally in the wrong." I think there are great arguments against what Bush/Obama/Clinton have done in the past, but LEGALLY the arguments change substantially. When it comes to Donald J. Trump, though, the legal arguments against what he's done are very, very, very clear. He's egregiously violated several US laws, with clear evidence that it happened, only for his personal gain, at the detriment to the United States. These facts are unique to Donald Trump, and don't apply to the other presidents that people say "have committed crimes."