Pinned Tweet
A year ago this month, Oklo closed at $174. Today it closed at $27.
Nuclear and quantum were 2025's favorite stories. In 2026, with the S&P 500 up 13%, they're two of the worst places to have been.
NUCLEAR: -47% YTD
(Oklo, NuScale, Nano Nuclear, Centrus, Cameco)
→ The basket was +41% on Jan 28. It's lost more than 60% since.
→ NuScale is 89% off its high and still has no binding power deal.
→ $OKLO opened a fresh $1B at-the-market share program in September. Analysts see ~$6.5B of burn through 2030.
QUANTUM: -40% YTD
(IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, Quantum Computing Inc)
→ Peaked at +29% on Jun 2. Down 53% since.
→ Within three days in October, IonQ agreed to an all-stock deal worth up to $1.3B, then priced a $2B stock sale.
→ D-Wave still trades near 67x forward sales and now faces a class action.
Same knife for both: the 10-year yield hit 5.26% on Oct 14. Far-off profits are worth less when bonds pay 5%.
The case for a rebound
Nuclear
Big Tech keeps signing. On Oct 6, Google signed a 20-year deal for 890 MW of new nuclear capacity from Constellation.
Uranium's long-term contract price hit $96.50/lb in September, topping the 2007 peak.
Five test reactors went critical under DOE's pilot this year, Oklo's included. Meta signed on to prepay for power from Oklo's 1.2 GW Ohio campus.
Quantum
$IONQ grew Q2 sales 287% to $80.1M and raised its 2026 guide to $280-290M.
DARPA moved IonQ into the final stage of its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative on Oct 7.
Washington is buying in: up to $100M CHIPS awards each for D-Wave and Rigetti (for government equity stakes), plus two quantum executive orders in June.
The honest risk
Nuclear: almost no revenue until reactors run. Oklo's first Ohio power is targeted for 2030 at the earliest.
Quantum: the cash comes from new shares. IonQ's two deals could lift its share count by close to half.
Next test: IonQ and NuScale both report Nov 5.
If you could only own one from here, is it the reactors or the qubits?
Boo-yah! #Halloween is headed for a record $13.5B. Costumes $4.4B, decor $4.3B, candy $4.1B. 4.6M kids are going as Spider-Man, and pets get $920M in costumes, pumpkin on top. That's 4x the 2005 haul. $HSY
They don't need SpaceX to fail. They need it to grow slower than Google.
Even at Google speed, 20% a year, $SPCX still hits $30T. Just five years late. 🐢
So which is it: absurd, or the floor? 👇
$30 TRILLION SpaceX? 🚀 Wall Street is laughing.
Wall Street laughed last time too. 😏
Ron Baron called it: $20T, $30T, $50T.
Then Elon stepped to the line: over $100T in under 10 years. "Unless there's a major world war." Casual.
Absurd? Let's go to the tape. 📼
From $1.95T today, $30T in 10 years takes 31% a year.
Not a miracle. Just a good decade.
$NVDA: 63% a year 🔥
$TSLA: 49%
SpaceX itself: 56% since 2015
The "impossible" number is running SLOWER than all three.
That's not a moonshot. That's the slow lane. 🐢
Rewind to 2016. Fortune: a $1T Apple is "far from reach."
Apple today: $5T.
Far from reach? It reached. Then it reached four more times. 🍎
Jim Chanos on Tesla: "We think the equity is worthless."
Worthless is now worth $1.6T. 💀
"But nobody grows like that from $2T!"
Says who? The trillion-dollar club didn't exist until 2018.
Nvidia walked in at $1T in 2023. It's 5x since. In three years.
The bear case is real ⚠️ SpaceX is burning cash on rockets and AI chips, and S&P sees no positive cash flow until 2029.
Fine. Slow it down to Google speed, 20% a year.
It STILL gets to $30T. Just in 15 years instead of 10.
The doubters don't need SpaceX to fail.
They need it to grow slower than Google. 🎤
So who's got this one wrong:
the people calling $30T absurd, or the people calling it the floor? 👇
$SPCX
$30 TRILLION SpaceX? 🚀 Wall Street is laughing.
Wall Street laughed last time too. 😏
Ron Baron called it: $20T, $30T, $50T.
Then Elon stepped to the line: over $100T in under 10 years. "Unless there's a major world war." Casual.
Absurd? Let's go to the tape. 📼
From $1.95T today, $30T in 10 years takes 31% a year.
Not a miracle. Just a good decade.
$NVDA: 63% a year 🔥
$TSLA: 49%
SpaceX itself: 56% since 2015
The "impossible" number is running SLOWER than all three.
That's not a moonshot. That's the slow lane. 🐢
Rewind to 2016. Fortune: a $1T Apple is "far from reach."
Apple today: $5T.
Far from reach? It reached. Then it reached four more times. 🍎
Jim Chanos on Tesla: "We think the equity is worthless."
Worthless is now worth $1.6T. 💀
"But nobody grows like that from $2T!"
Says who? The trillion-dollar club didn't exist until 2018.
Nvidia walked in at $1T in 2023. It's 5x since. In three years.
The bear case is real ⚠️ SpaceX is burning cash on rockets and AI chips, and S&P sees no positive cash flow until 2029.
Fine. Slow it down to Google speed, 20% a year.
It STILL gets to $30T. Just in 15 years instead of 10.
The doubters don't need SpaceX to fail.
They need it to grow slower than Google. 🎤
So who's got this one wrong:
the people calling $30T absurd, or the people calling it the floor? 👇
$SPCX
AWS grew 39%, its fastest in about five years, and the stock still fell. The number that did it: $77.3B of capex in a single quarter, up from $44.2B in Q1. Trailing free cash flow is now -$42.4B. $AMZN
The market needs to hear from @GavinSBaker at Atreides and Brad Gerstner @altcap (2 of the largest shareholders) to stop the bleeding on $CBRS regarding the short report from Culper
Before you trade Culper's $CBRS short, know the shop. Tecnoglass, Gorilla and LifeMD all sued it, and two AppLovin-related defamation suits are still pending. It says it may trade after publishing. Its misses: AAOI +198%, IREN +113%, AXSM +98%.
Monday it was ₩60.5T in Q2. Q3 just landed:
$SKHY quarterly operating profit
Q3 last year: ₩11.4T
Q3 now: ₩83.3T
An 80% margin on memory chips, plus ~₩100T (~$75B) going back to shareholders this year.
KOSPI jumped 6.6% to 6,012 and still sits about a third below its June record.
$GOOGL closed at $320.58 into tonight's earnings, 21.5% off its May high and just above $314.90, the low after July earnings. The 50-day sits only $0.66 over the 200-day. At a flat price they cross Thursday.
Does $315 hold, or does the death cross print?
Robinhood's CFO says he doesn't "over-index on any one month." October still headlined the outlook: $13B+ in deposits, $6B of it one Dell family gift. Q3 deposits slid to $15.7B from $21.7B and $HOOD fell 7.4% after hours. Is October the signal or the asterisk?
$CBRS is down 71% from its IPO-day high, but the selling is fading, not climaxing. The $106 double low printed on about 0.75x average volume, and the final unlock lands Nov 9. Are you willing to be early here, or waiting for the flush?
On Oct 12 at $151, we marked $107 as the price where $CBRS is worth just its $25.4B signed backlog. It bottomed at $106.13, twice. The backlog floor has held so far. The volume says the real test is still ahead.
nitter.gq/chartillect/status/210…
Replying to @DiligentPlane
Nobody knows the bottom. But the balance sheet tells you where the floors are.
$185: IPO price, now in the rearview
$151: today, a new all-time low
$107: market cap = its $25.4B signed backlog
$33: just the cash
At $151 it trades at ~10x next year’s expected revenue.
$CBRS






















