
REAL Physician Influence @HealthQuant. KOL Identification & Strategy. Social analytics pioneer. Advisor: @MayoClinic SMN, @SxSW. https://xitter.cf/t.co/xz4VnEoCDt
Austin, TX
Joined June 2008
- Tweets33K
- Following15.9K
- Followers19K
- Likes3.3K
Greg Matthews retweeted
AUSTIN MAN gets turned away from a CapMetro bus after he tried to hit the driver, then accosts a man riding an e-bike down the sidewalk, pulls him off, grabs his backpack, and throws punches when the man chases him to get it back -- sending the victim to the hospital, five months after he punched a stranger in the head at another Austin bus stop and walked away with credit for time served.
The victim in the recent attack left in an ambulance. Police found more than 5 grams of meth in John Swain's pocket. Swain told the officer that if he had really swung first, he would have knocked the man out and "taken his backpack and taken his bike."
The officer wrote that he'd dealt with Swain "on many occasions." Prosecutors know him well too, but don’t prosecute him.
In 2024, Swain was charged with aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury, a second-degree felony. DA José Garza's office let him plead down to misdemeanor assault.
In November 2025, state troopers found meth in his tent downtown and he resisted arrest. Garza's office never filed the drug charge. County Attorney Delia Garza's office declined the resisting arrest charge.
In April, he was arrested stumbling drunk and screaming obscenities at people outside the downtown library, where he was already banned. Twelve days later he was shirtless on Congress Ave, blocking traffic and confronting strangers while diners on restaurant patios called 911. That case was dismissed.
In May, he walked up to a stranger sitting at a bus stop on Guadalupe, punched him in the head, and pedaled away from police on a pink bicycle. The officer knew him of course and chased him, calling him by his first name. Swain was charged only with evading. He bonded out and skipped court. When police finally brought him back, he got credit for time served.
Greg Matthews retweeted
James Talarico: “We’ve all been focused on the wrong 1%. You heard a lot about trans people in this race, they’re 1% of the population. You’ve heard about Muslims in this race from Republicans, they’re 1% of the population. Even undocumented immigrants are 1% of the population. We are focused on the wrong 1% because the only minority destroying America is the billionaire class and it’s time that we tax them, make them pay their fair share so we can invest in education and healthcare”
Greg Matthews retweeted
The city of Austin has taken the liberty of misrepresenting “Prop i” on its website
So we had a smart lawyer-type man mark it up to ensure its correctness.
Integrity and honesty are important. So is transparency.
Greg Matthews retweeted
Physicians read hemodynamic tracings. Executives read P&Ls.
Almost none of us read our own balance sheet.
Here is how I think about it, and why it matters more than your income 🧵
Greg Matthews retweeted
D8 candidate Jeffery Bowen just posted a literal contract with the district.
Exact commitments. No hedging. He is asking voters to hold him to it.
Same spirit as Prop I: measure results, demand accountability, stop writing blank checks.
Early voting is open NOW. This race is close.
Vote for Bowen in District 8.
My contract with District 8 - hold me accountable
district8dispatch.substack.c…
Anyone else game ?
Greg Matthews retweeted
Austin’s status quo has already failed us.
Higher costs, stalled projects, developer-first priorities, and more of the same for a decade.
This is the chance to stop it.
Vote against the Status Quo Slate — Amber Goodwin, José Velásquez, Ryan Alter, Selena Xie, and Zo Qadri.
Our city can do better than the last ten years
Greg Matthews retweeted
Two investors. Same $1M portfolio. Same 8% pre-tax return. 25 years.
One ends with $6.1M. The other with $4.3M.
The difference is not stock picking. It is tax drag.
A thread on the most underrated number in a high earner's financial life 🧵
Greg Matthews retweeted
Austin voters will see a ballot measure for Prop I this year. As a former @austintexasgov employee, I recommend you vote in favor. I remember being part of meetings where $50,000 expenditures were made with little due diligence because that was just loose change in the City's couch cushions. Help hold the City of Austin accountable to the taxpayer with an outside audit.
vimeo.com/1236104700/61a43d4…
Greg Matthews retweeted
Wow.
Former Speaker @DadePhelan says he’s not voting for Paxton, Bo French and possibly Dan Patrick.
Something. Happening.
The former Texas House speaker and Paxton antagonist on why he’s buying a blue wave: texasmonthly.com/news-politi…
Greg Matthews retweeted
Why Austin voters stopped trusting City Hall with their money - and want Proposition I.
1. 67 of 151 annual performance expectations by hired vendors were missed.
2. $1.08 million for a new Austin city logo.
3. Austin government staff could not provide requirements/needs for >half of "consulting contracts".
4. ~150 solo lunches charged to a City card.
5. ~$980,000 in fraudulent vendor transactions from a single employee.
saveaustinnow.com
Greg Matthews retweeted
Take back your city, Austin. Do it for this generation, and for the next. Our children do not need to be fighting these same transparency battles in the decades to come.
Vote Aye on Prop I.
Vote for New Council Leadership.
"As city employees, these union members are supposed to be public servants. That means they are supposed to serve the public, rather than the public serving them. They are, in fact, the most resistant force against change...
How is it that an audit is good if the Council requires it, but bad if the public requires it? In a democracy, citizens create their government."
Statement issued by New Day Austin, in response to today's AFSCME press conference opposing Prop I (and attended by six Council sycophants):
📷
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Statement from New Day Austin
AUSTIN, TEXAS, October 7, 2026
Today’s press conference underscores exactly why Austin needs a new City Council and why Austin needs to mandate regular City efficiency audits in its Charter.
Austin needs a new direction at City Hall. These incumbents and their self-serving special interests simply failed to get the drift from last fall’s defeat, by nearly a 2-to-1 margin, of their proposed 20% tax increase under Prop Q. As city employees, these union members are supposed to be public servants. That means they are supposed to serve the public, rather than the public serving them. They are, in fact, the most resistant force against change.
The public deeply mistrusts the City Council’s spending decisions. The reckless City Council majority needs to be replaced with responsible citizens who will put the household budget ahead of the city budget, who will abide by the public will, and who will welcome the scrutiny for savings that a Prop I audit would mandate before going back to the voters and asking for more.
How is it that an audit is good if the Council requires it, but bad if the public requires it? In a democracy, citizens create their government. They can vote directly on laws and policies, such as Prop I, and they can elect public officials to represent them. Elected officials derive their power from the public, not the other way around.
Austin voters want the government to take a different direction. We have a golden opportunity to correct our course in the upcoming election. To that end, New Day Austin wholeheartedly supports five challengers who will do so, and we endorse the audit mandated by Proposition I.
NewDayAustin.com
Greg Matthews retweeted
Replying to @katiekam4austin @leftistintexas
Prop I gives us the report, the data, that informs the rest of the strategy.
Having unbiased data is the best way to ensure that our government functions well:
That we're not wasting money on consultants - which enables us to bring those services in house and pay city employees, residents, to do the work.
That we're not funding corrupt organizations which divert tax dollars - which enables us to provide better services that reach their intended recipients.
It's about respecting the scarcity of our tax dollars so that our investments in our city and residents have the greatest impact on our daily lives.
Greg Matthews retweeted
pcronline.com/Cases-resource…
To all women out there-You got this. Just join us!!! Interventional Cardiology Needs You!!!
Greg Matthews retweeted
Guy who beat a 6-month pregnant woman and dragged her down the stairs by her hair, then got arrested again and again while out on bond -- here's what happened since January:
Prosecutors dismissed the violence assault charge.
His drug dealing arrest included six felony drug cases. 5 were dismissed, 1 was pled down.
Another drug stash with 4 first-degree felony cases. DA rejected all 4, no charges filed.
Bonded out again in April.
So 11 cases. Just 1 conviction, on a reduced charge.
He’s parole-eligible in 3 years, minus time served and good-conduct credit, so there is little chance he will be in prison for long.
DA Garza and his prosecutors apparently did everything in their power to get him the lightest sentence.
Reminder that Garza campaigned on refusing to prosecute drug crimes on the books.
AUSTIN MAN out on bond for beating a 6-month pregnant woman - punching her head, dragging her by the hair down the stairs while her two small children ran to a neighbor begging them to call 911. Deputies had to ram through the front door he'd barricaded shut.
A month later, still on bond: arrested again dealing cocaine, heroin, meth, and more.
Two months after that, still on bond: dragged another woman to the ground by her hair until it ripped out.
Then in January, cops linked Paul Torres to a Williamson County overdose.
Search warrant turns up a drug stash big enough to stock a street market: a kilo of cocaine, half a kilo of heroin, 200+ grams of fentanyl, nearly 600 grams of meth, plus Xanax, shrooms, and $17K cash.
Torres, 35, has been cycling through Travis County courts for decades.
His record:
• 25+ cases
• Organized crime charges (first-degree felony) — dismissed
• Aggravated assault with deadly weapon — dismissed
• First-degree drug dealing — reduced to simple possession
• Burglary, car theft, assault — plea after plea
Only real time served: 2 years for burglary in 2009. Everything else: Dismissed, reduced, or time-served deals.
Greg Matthews retweeted
Mitch Little says the #TxLege has the ability to fire Jose Garza. Good idea. It's long overdue.
My esteemed follow @realmitchlittle suggesting the #txlege should look into impeaching and removing Travis County DA Jose Garza this morning in Gov Oversight Committee. I know just the team for the job..
Greg Matthews retweeted
If you love seeing your tax dollars go towards shelters and wrap around services for the homeless, vote for Zo.
If you'd like to see a real path for people to be treated with dignity and permanently exit from support services, look elsewhere.
The answer is clear:
Zo Must Go.
Greg Matthews retweeted
Early takeaways from Austin Deep Tech Week:
1. Austin is a serious f*cking city.
SF is still the center of gravity.
LA has built an absolute monster around aerospace, defense and industrials.
But after spending a few days in Austin, I'm increasingly convinced this city has structural advantages that the coasts underestimate.
People I've met here seem to have one primary objective:
Build.
Heads down. Gas pedal pinned to the floor.
Noticeably less obsession with looking important and more obsession with actually making shit work.
Deep tech rewards exactly that mentality.
2. Texas being aggressively pro-business isn't some Twitter talking point. It's an actual competitive advantage.
Heard versions of this repeatedly from founders and investors this week.
Permitting. Regulation. Taxes. Energy. Land. Manufacturing. Expansion.
When you're building software, you can abstract yourself away from geography.
When you're building atoms, geography becomes part of your cap table.
Every additional month waiting on a facility, permit, power connection or expansion is effectively dilution.
Texas understand that speed matters.
3. The coastal migration isn't over.
SF and LA still have unbelievable technical talent density, particularly at the earliest stages.
But the requirements change when a deep tech company starts working.
Now you need 100,000 square feet.
Power.
Testing.
Manufacturing.
Suppliers.
Technicians.
Hundreds of employees.
Suddenly Texas starts looking a hell of a lot more attractive.
And founders here don't seem nearly as worried about convincing talent to follow them as outsiders assume.
4. The next chapter isn't companies moving to Texas. It's companies starting here.
Historically the playbook has often been:
Coast → prove technology → raise capital → expand into Texas.
I think that increasingly becomes:
Texas → Texas → Texas.
More technical founders will move here before starting the company.
More pre-seed and seed companies will originate here.
More headquarters will be planted here from Day 1.
And that's when the flywheel gets interesting:
Talent → startups → capital → exits → experienced operators → new startups.
Once that loop starts compounding, ecosystems become very difficult to stop.
5. Austin feels significantly less distracted.
There is obviously bullshit everywhere. Startups attract grift like flies to shit.
But there's noticeably less keeping-up-with-the-Joneses energy here.
Less worrying about who raised what round.
Less optimizing for appearances.
Less obsession with which VC follows you or which dinner you got invited to.
More:
Does the thing actually work?
That cultural difference matters more than people realize.
6. “But the capital is on the coasts” is becoming a lazy argument.
Have you ever heard of a f*cking airplane?
It's 2026.
If you're building a generational company in Austin and a great investor in SF wants into the round, they're getting on the plane.
Great companies don't travel to capital.
Capital travels to great companies.
Austin already has serious institutional capital on the ground alongside a growing ecosystem of smaller funds.
More capital will follow the companies.
It always does.
7. Austin increasingly looks built for where deep tech is going, not where venture has been.
Deep tech is becoming less about a handful of scientists sitting in a Bay Area lab and increasingly about deploying massive amounts of physical infrastructure.
Factories.
Energy.
Robotics.
Defense.
Space.
Advanced manufacturing.
Data centers.
Industrial systems.
Those businesses eventually collide with the physical world.
And the physical world cares about land, power, regulation, labor, logistics and speed.
Texas has a lot of all six.
SF still has the deepest venture ecosystem. LA has built an extraordinary deep tech machine.
But Austin doesn't need to become either of them.
It may be building something fundamentally different:
A startup ecosystem optimized not just for inventing hard technology — but for actually industrializing it.
That's a much more interesting proposition.
Came into Austin Deep Tech Week thinking this was an important emerging hard tech ecosystem.
Now thinking “emerging” might already be outdated.
Ingredients are here.
Talent is coming.
Capital will follow.
Unlike a lot of startup ecosystems I've visited, Austin feels like it actually wants you to build shit here.
That's a hell of a tailwind 🏭🇺🇸
Finally - mad props @Andercot, @CaitlinCloud9, @Jason_A_Scharf + many others for putting this together & making this a kickass week!
Greg Matthews retweeted
Are you paying attention to the Austin City Council races? You should be.
The City of Austin and League of Women Voters are hosting Candidate Panels.
If you're in Districts 1, 3, 5, 8, or 9 - learn about your candidates and vote wisely. The future of Austin depends on it.
Find out which District you live in:
geohub.austintexas.gov/pages… (of course, this page is terrible on a phone, so use a desktop browser if it doesn't display well)

































