“i would’ve done it for free. it was absolutely my pleasure to crush a white nationalist insurrection and we’ll do it as many times as it takes” - daniel hodges
Joined January 2010
- Tweets81.5K
- Following623
- Followers356
- Likes223K
Can’t even commit to impeaching a war criminal murderer with an 83-seat majority
Asked whether House Democrats will pursue Hegseth impeachment in a majority, Hakeem Jeffries told reporters:
“We'll have that conversation at the appropriate time, and that'll be led by Adam Smith, soon to be chair of the Armed Services Committee, and Jamie Raskin, the next chair of the judiciary.”
8
drury to the hague? retweeted
CNN: 11 Democrats missed Hegseth’s impeachment vote
OJEDA: I say shame on them for not showing up. They had an opportunity to finally get rid of this buffoonery that we have and they failed. So you know what? I think the 120th Congress, we'll take that up.
drury to the hague? retweeted
Kamlager-Dove on Hegseth Impeachment: We knew that this vote was coming, so people should have gotten their raggedy selves up these steps to vote. There is no reason why we should have lost this vote because of attendance issues.
You know this man should not be in this position. That’s why he got up at 8 o’clock in the morning with his sorry self to plead to the American people.
So shame on folks who are not here. Because these people lost. They lost, and they still found a way to show up to table this bill. Shameful.
drury to the hague? retweeted
Hi Matt. I’m more than a little confused by this critique. Even folks who just had a passing knowledge of @AbdulElSayed’s campaign know that his slogan was about 3 things: Money out of politics, money in your pocket & Medicare for all.
Whether you (or other Democrat Senators or anyone, really) disagree with that is irrelevant to the facts that those were the things he explicitly campaigned on.
Do you truly believe that given the above facts, he should simply pretend that is not what he campaigned on? Or, alternatively, that he should acknowledge that despite campaigning on those ideals, he’s abandoning them days after the election because he won by 7 and other Democratic candidates won by 9?
Lastly, I understand you always seem to be focused on maximizing electability and far less focused on maximizing enacting actual reforms, but given your (and others) focus on electability concerns, isn’t right now—literally the furthest out from the next election we possibly could be—the best possible time to raise these issues?
drury to the hague? retweeted
Ojeda: It bothers me that we have so many people that like to rattle the drums of war, and they have no idea what the ramifications are.
There have been a lot of things that have been done wrong that need to be addressed.
You know, we don’t kill people in the Caribbean and just think it’s no big deal. We don’t bomb a school that kills 160-plus little girls and just say that that’s water under the bridge.
Crimes have been committed
drury to the hague? retweeted
Split screen at Capitol Hill today:
Hakeem Jeffries is arguing that he should be the leader of the Democrats — and then, as the current leader, he couldn’t get enough Democrats to show up to impeach Pete Hegseth
These worthless sellout Democrats really think we’re stupid and can’t see the roll call
Republicans just blocked the House from impeaching Pete Hegseth.
They are protecting an unqualified, incompetent man over our servicemembers.
What a disgrace.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The vote failed because 11 dems were absent.
x.com/DropSiteNews/s…
1
18
drury to the hague? retweeted
Then maybe show up to vote for it.
PETE HEGSETH OUT NOW.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
House Dems say Republicans protected Hegseth. 211-204 vote sent Massie’s resolution to committee, killing it. Massie was sole R voting to advance.
All present Dems voted to advance, but 11 Dems (incl. Pelosi) were absent—their votes would have defeated the motion.
politico.com/news/2026/11/1…
usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
theintercept.com/2026/11/10/heg…
x.com/GenXGirl1994/s…
x.com/DropSiteNews/s…
WHO MANS IS THIS 😂😂😂😂
I asked Hakeem Jeffries about attendance appearing decisive in the Pete Hegseth vote. (11 House Dems did not vote tonight.)
He told me and reporters: "I haven't had a conversation with anyone on the floor team about what may or may not have happened in terms of the Hegseth resolution, but this is not the end of it. It's just the beginning."
20
drury to the hague? retweeted
The Democratic Party needs a new and bold direction. I will not support Chuck Schumer’s reelection as Democratic leader.
Anyone who tells you we can’t/shouldn’t prosecute and lock people in this administration up is greenlighting this, a triple tap missile strike that killed 120 schoolchildren
This is disturbing.
Republican Congressman @RepThomasMassie just read his articles of impeachment for Pete Hegseth on the House floor.
Below he discusses the illegal strike that killed fleeing school children in Iran.
It's chilling to listen to.
4
1,353
Great choice for leader @HouseGOP!!
Jim Jordan: If that means prices go up for a short time, I think Americans understand and we can live with that.
Host: So, you’re saying we should be willing to live with higher prices?
7
Van Hollen:
“We have two members in that room, newly elected senators, who would not be there if Schumer and the DSCC had had their way. [They] sided with the crypto industry and AIPAC against these candidates, and my strong view is only under very, very rare exceptions should the DSCC be weighing in.”
30
