One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
This is some of the craziest shit I’ve ever seen in my entire life.
Our preliminary Times Voter Trends estimates for the results by demographic group
nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: The only way for Republicans to barely control the Senate in 2028 if current results hold (56D-44R)
🔴 Win presidency
🔴 Ohio
🔴 Arizona
🔴 Nevada
🔴 Georgia
🔴 Pennsylvania
🔴 New Hampshire
🔴 Hold Wisconsin, North Carolina, Alaska, Florida, Iowa and Tennessee special
Genuinely requires an actual red wave — 2024 margins would not cut it.
Not to mention incumbents like Mark Kelly, Cortez Masto, Warnock, Fetterman, Hasan etc. must be all unseated.
**Using preliminary Senate results assuming GOP loses Mississippi and Alaska**
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
🚨🇺🇸 NBC is forecasting a 75-seat Democratic majority in the House, bigger than the 2006 Iraq backlash or the 2010 Tea Party wave
In 2006 Democrats picked up 31 seats on the Iraq War; in 2010 Republicans took 63 on Obamacare.
Tonight's wave ran through Texas, Kansas and the Carolinas on an eight-month Iran war and $4 gas, and NBC's exit poll had 62 percent of voters disapproving of the president.
A 75-seat margin means Jeffries doesn't need the socialists or the moderates to pass anything, it means the Iran oversight hearings start with a supermajority on every committee, and it means the 2028 map Republicans assumed for a decade got redrawn in one night.
Source: NBC News / Writer: Daniel
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
SENATOR-ELECT calls JD Vance "Habibi" on election night.
"JD, Habibi, there is this delicious irony in the fact that you're constitutionally obligated to swear me in in January."
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Dems will get 55 Senate seats and 250+ House seats. Looking at the Senate map and considering such a massive House margin, it is very unlikely Republicans will recapture the Congress in 2028. Might not have a shot at Senate control until 2032.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Nick Fuentes wants Democrats to win the midterms so an outsider can take 2028
"We have to hսrt Vance. We have to hսrt Rubio politically in the hopes that in '27, when the primary starts, an outsider will enter the race and be favored for being an outsider."
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed proudly introduces himself as Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, America’s first Muslim senator, and then starts speaking in Arabic.
Americans better brace themselves. The communist and Islamic takeover has officially begun. They’re going to get exactly what they just asked for.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Yup, another year where @Polymarket proved to be both more accurate than polling and moved significantly quicker to make sense of and then disseminate information long before others are able to come to terms with the data. Huge positive externalities for everyone, beyond just the market participants themselves.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Ted Cruz predicts Democrats will go after Trump and his family, impeach Pete Hegseth, and BLOCK any Supreme Court pick for two years.
Get ready for two years of “all-out partisan war.”
CRUZ: “I think Schumer and the Democrats will just halt all judges, which means if we have a Supreme Court vacancy, I think they’ll keep the vacancy open for two years.”
“I don’t think they care because their base is that radicalized.”
“I think we will also see two years of relentless impeachment. I believe the House will impeach Donald Trump if they have the House. They may impeach him multiple times.”
“We will see subpoenas. We will see investigations. I think they will go after President Trump. I think they will go after his family. I think they will go after cabinet members.”
“I expect in the lame duck we will see an impeachment of Pete Hegseth.”
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
¿Qué pasa cuando un presidente en EE.UU. pierde las DOS cámaras en las midterms como le pasó a Trump hoy?
Le pasó a Bush en 2006 y a Obama en 2014. El gobierno no se acaba. Hay una serie de cambios claves que ocurren casi inmediatamente y que seguro veremos desde mañana.
1. Se terminan las grandes leyes.
2. Se gobierna por decreto y se usa el veto a los proyectos de ley de la oposición.
3. Se cambia algo en el gabinete
4z Y el debate pasa a centrarse más en política exterior.
Bush (2006). Los demócratas arrasaron con Nancy Pelos. Bush cambió a su secretario de Defensa, usó el veto 11 veces para frenar la retirada de tropas en Irak y, cuando estalló la crisis de 2008, tuvo que sentarse con la oposición para sacar el rescate bancario porque su propio partido no lo apoyaba.
Obama (2014): Los republicanos le arrebataron el Senado y Mitch McConnell le congeló todo (hasta un juez de la Corte Suprema). Obama gobernó a punta de decretos ambientales y cerró acuerdos que no requerían voto del Senado, como el pacto con Irán, el Acuerdo de París y la reapertura con Cuba.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Republicans are going to have a terrible night, and the simple reason why is that Trump has put up perhaps the worst *performance* this term of any president in a century or more.
Remember that he entered with an actual mandate: the House and Senate, a popular vote victory and a swing-state sweep, and 6-3 Supreme Court. Democrats were afraid enough to vote for mild but real immigration restrictionist legislation in the Laken Riley Act. Everyone wondered how far the "Vibe Shift" would go.
Trump managed to turn that into essentially zero durable wins whatsoever. He personally *hates* the very idea of legislation, the notion that he would have to spend time going back and forth with Congress, learning details and making compromises. So he simply didn't do it! He didn't make a compelling case for abolishing the filibuster. He didn't try communicating clearly to the public in support of popular bills to get to 60 votes. He just decided not to do it at all.
So they passed an unpopular tax cut, some funding for ICE, and a sop to the crypto industry, and that was basically it. Least productive Congress in decades, due to the tastes of one man.
Trump adopted one of the worst macro policies we've ever had: high deficits, high tariffs, and attacks on central bank independence. We managed to pay higher interest rates while still having high trade deficits AND weakening the dollar. Just a total failure.
On immigration, perhaps THE signature issue, Trump essentially min-maxxed effectiveness and backlash. Instead of trying to leverage the political moment for new laws and a self-deportation agenda (that is, walling off the economy to remove the benefit of irregular presence in the US), he opted for a maximally aggressive approach. The administration spent attention, funds, legal manpower on stunts like deporting random people to Salvadoran prisons with essentially no due process. ICE and Border Patrol were encouraged to be aggressive and confrontational, which helped contribute to the shooting deaths of American protestors. It turns out, that's extremely unpopular!
What about the approach of going after employers? The obvious vector? Trump hated that idea! He repeatedly has said he doesn't want to target businesses (especially farms) that use large amounts of illegal labor. This is just an incomprehensible position. Instead of charging a few dozen businessmen and removing the incentive for millions of illegal workers to be here, you arrest people off the street one by one at the cost of thousands of dollars in manpower per each, while their crying wives and kids post TikToks about it.
Upshot on immigration: electoral strength turned into a crippling electoral weakness in exchange for deporting maybe 6% of the illegally present population.
The tariffs were a total shitshow. Embarrassing rollout, no underlying theory of action at all. No targeted focus on key industries. Our country tariffed products we can't grow. We tariffed *inputs* of our own valuable exports. The schemes and amounts changed constantly, sending the stock market reeling and presenting scenes of chaos to the world.
Trump's messaging throughout has been generationally bad. While facing nearly 2:1 unpopularity, he spends his days posting AI slop, saying he'll rename New Mexico or invade allies, among other bizarre remarks. He brags about a ballroom and a pool repainting while gas hits records. At no point has he ever attempted any kind of message discipline.
Then there are the deeply unpopular attacks on rule of law, his "game-recognize-game" pardons for all manner of scammers and criminals, the crypto schemes that he and his family engage in, the evilly conceived and embarrassingly executed legal attacks on Comey, Jerome Powell, and others. With his monthslong stand on NOT releasing the Epstein files, he became maybe the first president ever to stake out a 99-1 issue on the 1% side.
That's not even getting into Iran, DOGE, his candidate recruitment choices, or countless other things. Simply put: Trump has managed to royally screw up virtually every single facet of his presidency. It's been undeniable, voters have noticed, and there's really no escape from it. This is what the GOP base chose in early 2024, and this is the world they're living with now. Where they handed the reins of history to a fat, vain, washed-up old man and let him drive.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Democrats are going to win tonight, but it's not because Americans suddenly love their radical open borders and woke social agenda.
It’s simply because people are angry at the GOP & Trump and struggling economically.
If Democrats overplay their hand, which they always do, there is hope for a quick Republican turnaround, but only if the GOP embraces economic populism, stays committed to closed borders and opposing amnesty, and turns its focus back on domestic issues. Likewise, if leadership insists on going back to Reaganism or repackaging Bush/Romneyism, it will only push the American people further into the Democratic camp out of sheer desperation.
Both parties have a lot to learn after tonight; I'm not sure either one will understand the assignment.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
Dear Republicans,
You brought us to war in Iran and ruined our economy for Israel. Go fuck yourself into oblivion.
Sincerely,
American voters.
Auburn Makes Me Drink retweeted
🚨🇺🇸🛩️ العثور على رفات بشرية في موقع تحطم الطائرة الخاصة ببالم بيتش
أفاد سكان في بالم بيتش بولاية فلوريدا بالعثور على ما وصفوه بأنه رفات بشرية في المنطقة التي شهدت تحطم طائرة خاصة، دون تأكيد رسمي حتى الآن لطبيعة الرفات.
🚨🇺🇸🛩️ مساعد طيّار الطائرة المنكوبة حصلت على رخصة الطيران في سن الـ17 قبل رخصة قيادة السيارة.
بدأت الأميركية ناثاليا غاديلها، التي كانت تصرخ طلباً للمساعدة، تعلم الطيران عام 2020، وحصلت على رخصة الطيران الخاصة وهي في الـ17 من عمرها، قبل أن تحصل على رخصة قيادة السيارات.
راكمت خبرة مبكرة في الطيران، وكان حلمها أن تصبح قائدة طائرة تجارية، لكن مسيرتها انتهت بشكل مأياوي في حادث تحطم طائرة "ليرجيت 60" بفلوريدا، الأحد، عن عمر 20 عاماً، حيث كانت تعمل مساعدة للطيار.

































