Deuce130 retweeted
I was wrong. THIS is as dark as it gets. I’ll warn you I couldn’t finish the video. People wonder how communists could kill 100 million people in the last century…this is why. These are not liberals. These are not democrats. They are demons. God help us.
Deuce130 retweeted
Almost nobody realizes that just about every liberal feel-good nostrum has been tested by liberal social scientists over the last 60 years, with practically none of them turning out true. That was already fairly well established when I started reading social science in 1972.
2028
Landslide
Secretary of State Marco Rubio just delivered the most brutal indictment of Third World Mass Immigration and Open Borders I've ever heard.
“They tell us that we are compelled by a sacred legal obligation to give up our power, to surrender our sovereignty, to submit to the whims of our enemies, to allow our cities to descend into violent anarchy, to welcome in any foreigner from anywhere in the world who arrives at our doorstep without permission, to transform our towns into refugee camps for the entire planet.”
“And beyond our borders, too, they would have us believe that we must allow our rivals to act against us with impunity, that those who flood our country with drugs and crime and death should be met with little more than the occasional and polite complaint.”
“There is nothing, there is nothing in our history or the history of any other great nation that requires us to recognize the authority or legitimacy of any of these ridiculous ideas.”
So good 🔥
9
Deuce130 retweeted
As a Conservative, I agree with 99% of what you write. But you’re wrong about this! This bill funds the benefits by reducing future disability benefits. The Republicans actually screwed Veterans over with this. Read the bill and read the VFW initiatives to fix it. We can’t give our party a pass on this. They screwed up something major.
Deuce130 retweeted
On Veterans Day, the last thing we should be doing is stripping our veterans of their hard-earned benefits, yet that’s what Republicans chose to vote on today. Their so-called “Take Care of America’s Veterans Act” would make more than $57 billion in cuts to future disability benefits, increase VA home loan refinancing fees by $4 billion, and expand the privatization of VA health care.
Instead, we should be advancing the bipartisan Major Richard Star Act to allow combat-disabled veterans to receive their full benefits.
Our veterans answered the call to serve and defend our nation. They earned these benefits, and they deserve a government that delivers on their promise to support them and their families.
Deuce130 retweeted
Rep. Bost, TCAVA is no substitute for the CLEAN Major Richard Star Act. Combat-wounded veterans deserve their full earned retirement. Update TCAVA to remove the caps, or pass H.R. 2102 as written! 🇺🇸 #MajorRichardStarAct
I guess now we know why Thune was so hostile to immigration enforcement...
🚨 THE FARM BILL FORGIVES FRAUD. EVEN FAKE CITIZENSHIP CLAIMS.
Yesterday I showed you that H.R. 9535 hands illegal farmworkers a visa. Now look at what it forgives to get them there.
The bill says these violations "shall be waived." Not may. Shall.
Illegal entry. Waived.
Unlawful presence, including the 3- and 10-year bars. Waived.
No valid papers. Waived.
Fraud and misrepresentation. Waived. In immigration law, that section includes falsely claiming to be a U.S. citizen.
The waiver covers conduct "in relation to obtaining employment performing agricultural labor." The one carve-out is fraud to get public benefits. In other words, if you used fake papers or lied about being a citizen to get a farm job, it's wiped clean.
And how do you prove you qualify? 180 days of farm work over two years, backed by "a written record of employment" from the employer. That's the same honor-system paperwork that made the 1986 farmworker program a fraud factory.
My career taught me that when the paperwork is the only proof, the paperwork is what gets faked.
You don't fix a farm labor shortage by forgiving identity fraud.
@HouseAgGOP @CongressmanGT @JudiciaryGOP @Jim_Jordan @StephenM @RealTomHoman @SecMullinDHS @Phase2Deport @NICEnforcement @itsyourgov
4
Oh weird. Another one.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) doesn't want you to know that he has backed legislation that has funneled over $10 MILLION into an environmental nonprofit his wife, Sandra, consults for.
Dr. Sandra Whitehouse is a marine ecologist and long-time environmental consultant for Ocean Conservancy through her firm, Ocean Wonks LLC.
According to nonprofit tax filings, Ocean Conservancy paid Whitehouse's wife, either directly or through her consulting firm, more than $2.7 million between fiscal year 2010 and 2023.
Between 2008 and 2025, Ocean Conservancy was awarded 19 federal grants totaling ~$14.2 million. In 2024, they received a $5.2 million federal award for marine debris cleanup funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which Whitehouse endorsed and voted for. Later that same year, Ocean Conservancy received an additional $1.7 million for marine debris cleanup through federal appropriations legislation that Whitehouse supported.
🔗usaspending.gov/recipient/68…
That's more than $6.9 million in federal grants in 2024 alone to an environmental organization that has maintained a longstanding financial relationship with the senator's wife.
But it gets worse than that, I'm afraid.
Sen. Whitehouse serves as the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, and has served on the committee for almost 20 years.
5
Deuce130 retweeted
Most people calling your ancestors evil are historically illiterate.
Consider Hernan Cortes and the Conquistadors.
He landed with only a few hundred Spaniards, and most of his fighting force was made up of indigenous peoples who wanted the Mexica gone.
By the time they launched their final siege, Cortes had somewhere in the neighbourhood of 50-200K indigenous warriors fighting for him.
This doesn't mean the Conquistadors were saints. Far from it. The attack on Cholula was a good example of their depravity at times.
However, framing the events as cleanly Europeans vs Indigenous is highly disingenuous.
Pretending the Mexica were a fun-loving bunch, living in harmony before the arrival of Cortes, is pure fiction.
Montezuma's empire would capture people from neighbouring tribes and offer them to the gods as human sacrifices.
Which is why so many were willing and eager to collaborate with Cortes. They were using him as much as he was using them.
When these people talk about the hypocrisy of "thou shalt not steal" and "thou shalt not kill," they paper over reality with a child-like rendition of events.
Amen
Prezes Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Bogdan Święczkowski wręcza wyrok Sądu Najwyższego.
Szanowni Państwo, stawiliśmy się tutaj w czterech: sędziów Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, czyli ja, Prezes Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Bogdan Święczkowski, Wiceprezes Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Bartłomiej Sochański, sędzia Stanisław Piotrowicz oraz sędzia Jarosław Wyrębak.
Mamy, mamy w ręku w tej chwili uchwałę Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 listopada 2026 r. o sygnaturze akt II ZZIII/26. Wydana ta uchwała jest w składzie trzyosobowym: Prezes Sądu Najwyższego Maria Szczepaniec jako przewodnicząca, sędzia Sądu Najwyższego Marek Dobrowolski sprawozdawca oraz ławnik Sądu Najwyższego Arkadiusz Sopata, który, którzy uchwalili, co następuje.
Po pierwsze: uchylają zarządzenie z dnia 30 października 2026 r. o zarządzeniu natychmiastowej przerwy w czynnościach sędziego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Bogdana Święczkowskiego, w tym w pełnieniu obowiązków Prezesa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego na okres miesiąca. Po drugie: uchylić zarządzenie z dnia 30 października 2026 r. o zarządzeniu natychmiastowej przerwy w czynnościach sędziego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego Bartłomieja Sochańskiego, w tym w pełnieniu obowiązków Wiceprezesa Trybunału Konstytucyjnego na okres miesiąca.
Szanowni Państwo. W tej chwili, w imieniu swoim oraz obecnych tutaj sędziów, domagam się, domagam się otwarcia furtki i umożliwienia wejścia legalnemu Prezesowi oraz Wiceprezesowi, a także dwóm sędziom, na teren Trybunału Konstytucyjnego oraz do budynku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego.
Do funkcjonariuszy policji mam wezwanie w tej chwili, żeby natychmiast się pojawił tutaj dowódca, który wami zawiaduje. Mam zamiar mu doręczyć to postanowienie, żeby je natychmiast wykonał. Postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego jest prawomocne i wymaga natychmiastowego wykonania. Wzywam dowódcę, który tutaj przebywa i zawiaduje tymi policjantami, którzy są na terenie, aby natychmiast stawił się dowódca, bo mam, ma zamiar doręczyć to postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego.
Szanowni Państwo, jeżeli się nie stawi dowódca, dopuszcza się przestępstwa, bo musi odebrać postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego, które mam zamiar doręczyć. Wzywam funkcjonariuszy policji do odebrania tego postanowienia. Jednocześnie chcę Państwa poinformować, że wszyscy uzurpatorzy oraz pracownicy Trybunału otrzymali drogą elektroniczną to postanowienie, które jest natychmiastowo wykonalne.
Wzywam po raz kolejny do tego, aby otworzyć furtkę i umożliwić wejście mi na teren Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z pozostałymi sędziami, trzema sędziami Sądu Najwyższego, yyy, Trybunału Konstytucyjnego.
Gdzie jest dowódca akcji? Szanowni Państwo, którzy nagrywacie, gdzie jest dowódca akcji? Może ktoś podejdzie i odbierze ode mnie to postanowienie?
No czy boicie się, Szanowni Państwo? Tchórz was obleciał? Podejdźcie, odbierzcie kartkę papieru. To jest tylko kartka papieru.
Dlaczego nikt nie podchodzi? Czy uzyskam informację, czy podejdzie tu którykolwiek z funkcjonariuszy, który kieruje tą akcją przed Trybunałem Konstytucyjnym?
Po raz kolejny wzywam osobę, która kieruje tą akcją pod Trybunałem Konstytucyjnym, funkcjonariusza policji, żeby odebrał to postanowienie. To nie jest nic, to nie jest nic zagrożonego jakąś chorobą zakaźną, to jest postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego.
Wzywam osobę kierującą z policji tą akcją na terenie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, aby odebrała ode mnie postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego. Odebrać pismo!
Szanowni Państwo, widzicie, mamy do czynienia z niemowami, mamy do czynienia ze strachem funkcjonariuszy policji. Nie chce nikt podejść, odebrać to postanowienie.
Szanowni Państwo funkcjonariusze, w tej chwili to już nie są przelewki. Jest prawomocne postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego, że jestem legalnym Prezesem Trybunału Konstytucyjnego i jest tutaj ze mną legalny Wiceprezes Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, a wy nie chcecie nas wpuścić na teren Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, a nawet odebrać postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego. No to świadczy o tym, że policja stawia się ponad sądy i trybunały w Polsce.
Podkreślam po raz kolejny: pani Korwin-Piotrowska nie pełni żadnej funkcji w Trybunale Konstytucyjnym, ani żaden inny sędzia legalny, czy też osoba, która uważa się za sędziego, nie pełni żadnej funkcji w Trybunale Konstytucyjnym. Dopuszczacie się Państwo bardzo ciężkich, najprawdopodobniej przestępstw kryminalnych. Dlaczego nikt nie chce podejść? Szanowni Państwo, mamy do czynienia z całkowitym bezprawnym działaniem funkcjonariuszy policji, mamy do czynienia z całkowitym bezprawnym działaniem władzy wykonawczej oraz tych uzurpatorów, którzy są w Trybunale Konstytucyjnym.
W związku z powyższym zawiesimy tutaj tą uchwałę Sądu Najwyższego na furtce, po to, żeby funkcjonariusze policji, funkcjonariusze policji mogli się zapoznać z jej treścią, oraz inne osoby, żeby mogły... Cholera. Drugą stronę. Cholera.
Dobrze. Po drugiej stronie nie ma wejścia. Przełóżmy to. Dobrze, to niech pan da pana, nie, nie, nie. O pomoc.
Dobra. Z drugiej strony, proszę. Macie tu Państwo, przeczytajcie to postanowienie.
Do funkcjonariuszy policji mówię: może odrobina refleksji was przekona, że dopuszczacie się czynów zabronionych, nie wykonując postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego. Może, może przekonacie własnego dowódcę co do tego, iż dopuszczacie się czynów o charakterze kryminalnym, nie wykonując postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego.
Będziemy musieli poprosić o pomoc, najprawdopodobniej komornika, żeby opróżnić ten gmach, ale co do reszty, to na scenie porozmawiamy. Dziękuję bardzo.
2
Deuce130 retweeted
People think the current fight is about AI, about Nvidia, about a few bills in Washington.
No. The real fight is much simpler, and much more serious.
We're heading toward a new kind of civilization. That part is settled. The only question is: will we go through 1984 before we get there?
One: why superintelligence destroys the current system.
The system we live in rests on one scarcity: the scarcity of intelligence.
To understand a law, you need a lawyer. To read a balance sheet, you need an expert. To build a case, you need a firm. To access a market, you need a permit. To know what's true, you need a newspaper, an agency, an institution to tell you.
Every layer of this system is a toll booth. And every toll booth is manned by someone who lives off your inability to do without them.
Superintelligence makes intelligence abundant. Almost free. Available to everyone, every second. When intelligence becomes abundant, the toll booths become useless. And the people manning them know it.
So they'll do everything to keep the system alive. Not necessarily out of malice. Upton Sinclair summed it up: it's hard to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it. Licenses, moratoriums, federal agencies, blown-up scandals: every tool will be used to slow down what makes them obsolete.
Two: even if they win, they lose.
Because you can't contain an abundant technology with normal means.
An AI model is a file. It can be copied, sent, run on a machine in a basement. To stop it from spreading, you have to monitor every computer, every chip, every line of code, every exchange. There's no soft version of that control. There's only a total one.
That's the trap. To keep their system alive, they'll be forced to become totalitarian. Not because they want to, but because it's the only way to hold back abundance.
History has played this game before. The Ottoman Empire kept the printing press at bay for nearly three centuries. It preserved the established order, and watched Europe overtake it in every field. The USSR controlled photocopiers and kept watch over typewriters. It collapsed anyway.
And a system that confiscates the leverage of the many to reserve it for the few is, by definition, unfair. An unfair system can last. It can't last forever. It always ends up imploding, under the weight of its own illegitimacy, or under pressure from those elsewhere who didn't hit the brakes.
They can buy time. All they can do is push back the deadline. And the price of that delay is 1984.
Three: Elon's project.
Look at what he's building, piece by piece.
Abundant energy, with solar and batteries. Abundant labor, with robots. Abundant intelligence, with AI. Free information, with Starlink and X, far harder for a regime to shut down. And access to space, with reusable rockets.
This isn't a collection of companies. It's a machine for destroying scarcity.
And the world of takers and financiers lives off scarcity. Organized scarcity of access, permissions, capital, information. A world that captured everything through coercion and lies, by standing between people and what they could build.
Takers live off scarcity. Elon is industrializing abundance.
When abundance wins, rent dies. The toll booth has no road left to block. The gatekeeper has no gate left to guard.
That's why this fight is so violent. It's not a policy debate. It's one world fighting not to disappear, against another one being born.
We can go through 1984. Or we can skip straight to what comes next.
It's being decided now.
What a time to be alive.
The battle for Super Intelligence supremacy is the most important battle in generations.
Perhaps ever.
What if the operation on Jensen Huang wasn’t to steal secrets but to remove him from that battle.
Like a chess piece.
Like taking out Oppenheimer from the Manhattan Project.
It greatly weakens America’s position.
It greatly strengthens America’s enemies position.
Think about it.
Deuce130 retweeted
One of the reasons I don’t like socialism is public bathrooms.
A public bathroom is about as basic a shared resource as you can get. Everyone gets to use it, and everyone is expected to show a little consideration for the next person. The rules aren’t particularly complicated.
And yet, a shocking number of adults can’t even manage to throw their paper towels in the trash. Some will pee all over a toilet seat and leave it for the next person. And the next person, who didn’t make the mess, certainly isn’t going to clean it up either.
Now imagine trusting these same people to collectively manage an entire economy.
We can’t even get everyone to agree that cleaning up their own pee is a personal responsibility, but somehow we’re supposed to believe everyone will become hardworking, responsible, and considerate when we’re sharing the fruits of each other’s labor.
Now, compare your average public restroom to a Buc-ee’s bathroom.
Buc-ee’s figured something out. Clean bathrooms attract customers. Customers spend money. So the company has a financial incentive to keep those bathrooms spotless. They hire people to maintain them, hold employees accountable, and compete for your business.
And people will literally plan their road trips around stopping there.
That’s capitalism. Someone recognized a problem, found a way to solve it, and made money because people valued the result.
Of course, not everyone contributes equally to society. Some people work harder, make better decisions, and take more responsibility. Others seem perfectly content making life more difficult for everyone around them.
I believe people should have the freedom to live however they choose. I also believe in helping people who genuinely need it.
But I have a hard time accepting an economic philosophy that expects me to trust everyone to act in the collective interest when some people can’t be bothered to clean up after themselves.
Buc-ee’s figured out how to get people to willingly pay for a better experience.
Socialism wants me to believe the people leaving paper towels on the floor will suddenly become responsible stewards of everyone else’s resources.
I’m going with the beaver.
Deuce130 retweeted
Washington voters did every goddamn thing the political establishment lectures Americans about doing. They registered. They participated. They showed up. More than 1.25 MILLION voted to protect girls' sports, passing Initiative 638 with roughly 56% support.
And Seattle's insufferable progressive ruling class essentially told them to go fuck themselves.
Six days later, SEVEN arrogant assholes on the Seattle School Board unanimously authorized legal action against the voters' decision.
Seven smug bureaucrats looked at 1.25 million Americans and apparently decided those ignorant fucking peasants needed correcting.
The sheer, unmitigated arrogance is breathtaking.
These pompous little authoritarians had already opposed the initiative before Election Day. They lost. The voters rejected their bullshit. So naturally, they turned to lawyers to fight the result.
Because apparently democracy is wonderful until ordinary Americans start thinking for themselves.
Then socialist Mayor Katie Wilson jumped aboard this disgraceful circus, enthusiastically endorsing the challenge while babbling about everyone deserving to thrive.
Everyone? That's fucking precious.
What about the girls whose athletic opportunities voters chose to protect? What about the 1.25 million citizens whose votes your ideological buddies are trying to defeat?
Apparently, those people can eat shit.
And here's the most infuriating part of this entire steaming mountain of political horseshit: taxpayers could end up paying for the school board's legal crusade against the very law they voted to approve.
Think about that. You work your ass off. Pay your taxes. Cast your ballot. Win a decisive majority. Then government officials potentially reach into your wallet to finance their campaign against your own fucking vote.
These are the same sanctimonious frauds who've spent years screeching about protecting democracy, respecting elections, and defending the sacred will of the people.
What a spectacular crock of self-righteous bullshit.
The moment the electorate rejects their precious progressive agenda, these entitled bastards start treating democracy like a defective product that needs to be recalled.
Public office is a position of SERVICE, you arrogant, power-drunk assholes.
The taxpayers pay your salaries. The voters grant your authority. The government belongs to the PEOPLE.
And if your bloated fucking egos cannot tolerate citizens making decisions without your ideological permission, you've forgotten who the hell works for whom.
(article below)
Deuce130 retweeted
Three and a half weeks ago, a paper in Yang-Mills theory was intercepted by 5 people. Despite no reason for taking "Custody" nor need for "Shepherding".
Since no one else is saying it, let's review:
2/5: Octogenarians (85 and 88) who have been Washington's "Steady Hands" in Physics and Math for 50 years.
4/5: String Theorists. Despite ZERO mention of String Theory in the work at hand.
1/5: Rennaisance Technologies.
2/5: Stonybrook.
-----
As I have been trying to explain on every major podcast well in advance of this inexplicable 'custody' which happened in front of all our eyes...this is what happens to every major potential change in mathematical physics that comes from outside the "Only Game In Town" crowd. Like clockwork.
This is an enormous story about a tiny number of people: David Gross, Arthur Jaffe, their academic descendants and north shore Long Island. Remove that command and control complex and we go back to being the leading force in theoretical physics.
Statement of Yang-Mills Working Group, a scientific collaboration to interpret AI result related to the existence of quantum chromodynamics & completions of the Standard Model, including a subproblem proving the existence of the Quantum Yang-Mills theory. buff.ly/BwV89Tk
Deuce130 retweeted
A statistic that sounds fake but isn't: Not one single white American man born after 1984 has published a work of literary fiction in The New Yorker.
It's not because they stopped writing. It's because The New Yorker has refused to publish them. The publishing industry has blacked out a generation of male writers & then they wonder why boys don't read.
About 70% of publishing professionals are women.
Because agents and editors tend to select books they personally relate to, an increasing number of male authors are being sidelined in the publishing industry, resulting in an overwhelming number of female protagonists on our shelves—and a dearth of male ones.
No wonder young men are no longer reading.
