Okay, Opus 5.5 is amazing at motion design. This is my first attempt .. not bad.

I was successfully pressured into posting more and showing some of the projects and experiments I am working on. So here we go ... Highly experimental, first iteration: Generative AI studio in @dicehub, a template that generates customized applications based on user input and workflow requirements. The idea: you know what you need for your simulation and you already have your own custom workflow, you just talk to the chat and it generates everything based on already available components (3D visualization, storage, logs, HPC, etc.), attaches a domain-specific model to your problem and gives you a reproducible result that you can share. How is this different from just asking Claude to do it? You have an already prepared library of components and blocks that just work and you do not need to do everything from scratch. Writing the app was never the hard part anyway, the hard part is the solver coupling, the result readers, the visualization, finding the optimal settings, validating the result, etc. So the chat only has to work out your workflow instead of reinventing all of it every time. You run your custom but reproducible workflows, check the results with the domain-specific model and iterate. The goal is that the model and the workflow get better with every run. In the video you can see it generating simple apps, running workflows, etc. but there are still a lot of improvements to make. In my opinion this is probably where we are headed for specialized apps that still require a bit of detailed setup and a straightforward workflow setup, you do not want to prompt yourself to death when working on engineering problems. For most other applications the AI Chat will probably eat everything up, we can already see this happening.